Aug 16, 2022 Planning Commission

WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TWO VOTES ON THE, UH, CONSENT DOCKET ITEM FOUR DAYS DASH TRIPLE ZERO.

ONE TO BE AS TRIPLE 0 3 4, AND SEE, AS PR TWO, TWO DASH TRIPLE 0, 2 8 ARE THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION TO HAVING ONE OF THESE ACTED ON INDIVIDUALLY.

REMEMBER THE PUBLIC ON OUR CONSENT DOCKET.

WISH TO HEAR ONE INDIVIDUALLY, C NINE.

IS THERE A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR ITEMS FOR A AND B SECOND ADAM FOUR, A AND B ARE APPROVED AND WILL BE AT COUNCIL NOVEMBER 12TH.

IS THERE A MOTION AND A SECOND SEPTEMBER, SEPTEMBER 12TH.

I'M SORRY.

AND THEN ITEM D ITEM FOUR C, IS THERE A MOTION AND A SECOND ITEM, FOUR C SECOND, A SECOND ARGUED.

ITEM FOUR, CS APPROVED FOUR ZERO.

THAT, UH, WILL BE A COUNCIL NOTE SEPTEMBER 12TH.

[A. Case #PR21-00048 Public Hearing and Consideration of the Preliminary Plat for 33 Fields located south of 33rd Street and west of I-35 (HEA Development LLC)]

WE'RE NOW AT OUR PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION, DOCKET ITEM FIVE, A H E DEVELOPMENT CASE P R TWO ONE DASH TRIPLE 0 4 8.

PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 33 FIELDS LOCATED SOUTH OF 33RD WEST OF .

MR. ANTS FIVE, PLEASE.

MAYBE THE AFRICAN TO SEEK AN APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT OR 33 FIELDS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER BY 35 AND 33RD STREET ARE HIGHLIGHTED AND YOU NAIL IT ON THE SCREEN.

A PVD FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS APPROVED EARLIER THIS YEAR AND THE PLAT CONFORMS TO THAT PUD.

NOW THE CLOUD IS 236, LOTS ON 85 ACRES, A LOT SIZES RANGE FROM 4,400 SQUARE FEET, MOSTLY ON THE EASTERN SIDE AND 9,100 SQUARE FEET ON THE WEST.

UH, THE SMALLER LOTS ARE REAR LOADED OFF THE PRIVATE ALLEYWAYS AND IN TURN HAVE SMALLER FRONT YARD, SETBACKS OF 10 FEET.

UH, THE REMAINDER OF THE LOTS HAVE 15 FOOT SETBACKS ON THE FRONT ACCESS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD WILL BE FROM THE MAIN ENTRANCE ON THE 33RD AND TWO EXISTING CONNECTIONS TO THE SOUTH TO STEVEN AND KAREN DRIVES.

UM, THE PLAT MEETS THE TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE.

AND AS I SAID, CONFORMS TO THE PUD, NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.

THANK YOU, MISTER ANSWER THEIR QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR THE CITY PLANNER, THE APPLICANT HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO MR. INSECT POLLINATION.

UH, GOOD EVENING, MARK.

DOES THAT SOUND WITH JOHNSON AND ASSOCIATES 20 SHERATON AVENUE? I WOULD JUST POINT OUT THAT THE STAFF REPORT DOES IDENTIFY ONE VARIANCE THAT WE'RE SEEKING, AND THAT IS FOR THE MAXIMUM BLOCK LENGTH, UH, FOR OUR MAIN DRIVE.

UH, THE WAY WE'VE BROKEN THAT UP IS WITH TRAFFIC CIRCLES AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION.

SO THE WAY THE CODE READS BLOCK LENGTHS ARE REALLY DETERMINED BY STREET INTERSECTIONS.

WE'VE KIND OF SUBSTITUTED TRADITIONAL VEHICULAR STREETS WITH PEDESTRIAN STREETS AND HAVE IN AN EFFORT TO SLOW DOWN TRAFFIC INCLUDED TRAFFIC CIRCLE.

SO I JUST FOR THE RECORD, WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WAS NOTED.

UH, SOME TYPE OF TRAFFIC ADJUSTMENT.

MY MISTAKEN, OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT FROM THE COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMENT, ITEM FIVE, A PUBLIC COMMENT SEEING NONE.

UH, I DO HAVE A QUESTION, UH, MR. MANNY, UH, THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION SEVERAL WEEKS AGO ABOUT, AT SOME POINT,

[00:05:01]

UH, I THINK IT'S SOUTH ON 40TH STREET.

UH, WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT THAT? THERE WERE SOME REQUESTS VOLUMES.

THESE FEEDS ON THE STREET AND, UH, DURING THE ZONING STAFF WAS ASKED TO LOOK INTO THAT.

SO STAFF'S LOOKED INTO THAT AND, UH, WE'LL BE INSTALLING A STOP SIGN AT, UH, SORRY, ROAD AND 40TH STREET.

UM, THAT'S THE ONLY LOCATION IN THAT AREA THAT COULD HANDLE A STOP SIGN WHEN GEOMETRICALLY THERE.

THE NEXT INTERSECTION HAS SOME DRIVEWAYS THAT COMPLEX.

SO THIS IS THE BEST LOCATION.

THANK YOU, MR. MANIC, OR THEIR COMMISSION COMMENTS SEEING NONE.

IS THERE A MOTION AND A SECOND ITEM FIVE, A MOTION TO APPROVE SECOND THAT I AM PROVED FIVE TO ZERO, SEPTEMBER 12TH,

[B. Case #Z22-00008 Public Hearing and Consideration for Rezoning from “G-A” General Agricultural to “PUD Z22-00008” located on the west side of Westminster Road, south of Danforth Road. (Edmond Community Church) This item continued from the July 19, 2022 Planning Commission meeting.]

ITEM FIVE, B EDMOND, COMMUNITY CHURCH EDMOND, COMMUNITY CHURCH.

ARE THEY OKAY? ITEM FIVE.

B IS CASE IS 8 2 2 DASH 4 0 8 PUBLIC HEARING ITERATION FOR REZONING FROM GA GENERAL AG TO P U D Z TWO TWO DASH 0 0 0 0 8.

LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WESTMINSTER, SOUTH OF DANFORTH EDMUND COMMUNITY CHURCHES.

THE APPLICANT THERE PRESENT MR. ANTS, IF YOU HAVE AN UPDATE ON THAT, AS WELL AS THE COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS MEETING.

UH, AFRICANS SEEKING APPROVAL OF A PUD THAT WILL ALLOW A CHURCH, UH, THE OFFICES RELATED TO THE CHURCH, SOME EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AND RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES ON 50 OR SO ACRES ON THE WEST SIDE OF WESTMINSTER, SOUTH AT DANFORTH.

NOW THE SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED GA AND CONTAINS ABOUT 35 ACRES OF FLOODPLAIN.

THE CHURCH PLANS TO DEVELOP A SITE AND PHASES WITH THE FIRST PHASE BEING THE TEMPORARY WORSHIP SPACE.

AND THEN THE ADDING ONTO THAT BUILDING UNTIL COMPLETE, UH, EVENTUALLY THE SITE WILL CONTAIN, UH, PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS, CHURCH OFFICES, AND INDOOR OUTDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES, AND A SMALL, POTENTIALLY A SMALL AMPHITHEATER SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY IS LARGE LOT RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH IN UNDEVELOPED AG LAND TO THE SOUTHWEST AND EAST.

UH, THE CHURCH, OTHER BUILDINGS AND PARKING WILL BE ON THE 15 ACRES THAT IS OUT OF THE FLOODPLAIN ON THE NORTH PORTION OF THE SITE, UH, CHANGES IN THE PD FROM THE LAST MEETING INCLUDE, UH, PUSHING THE DRIVE ONTO WESTMINSTER AS FAR SOUTH AS THE CITY WILL APPROVE.

UH, THIS MAY REQUIRE A REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE STORMWATER ADVISORY BOARD AND MEETING ENGINEERING STANDARDS FOR SITE DISTANCE.

AND, UH, ANOTHER CHANGE IS NOT BUILDING THE LINK FROM DANFORTH TO THE SITE UNTIL THE FIRE CODE REQUIRES IT.

IF AT ALL, UH, IF IT IS REQUIRED, THEN PUSHING THAT A STREET OR A DRIVER OF AS FAR WEST AS POSSIBLE IN THE EASEMENT, THEY HAVE, UH, THE EDMOND PLAN 2018 DESIGNATES THE NON FLOOD PLAIN AREAS OF THIS AS RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH SUPPORTS THE LOW DENSITY, RESIDENTIAL AND SUPPORTING CIVIC ACTIVITIES SUCH AS A CHURCH STAFF SUPPORTS THE APPROVAL.

THANK YOU, MR. ANSWER OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR THE CITY PLANNER.

SO THE APPLICANT HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD BEYOND MR. OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR THE APPLICANT PUBLIC COMMENT, ITEM FIVE, B FIVE B PUBLIC COMMENT, FIVE B C NINE.

THANK YOU FOR WORKING THAT OUT OR THEIR COMMISSION COMMENTS SEEING NINE, IS THERE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE FIVE B.

SO MOVED SECOND.

THAT ADAM'S PROVED FIVE TO 0 9 12.

[C. Case #PR13-00001 Public Hearing and Consideration of an extension to the Preliminary Plat for Thunder Canyon, located on the east side of Midwest Boulevard, south of Covell Road. ]

YES, SIR.

UH, ITEM FIVE C THE APPLICANT'S PRESENT CASE P R ONE THREE DASH 0 0 0 0 1.

IT'S PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF AN EXTENSION TO THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THUNDER CANYON LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MIDWEST BOULEVARD, SOUTH DAKOTA VALE.

MR PLEASE.

UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE EXTENSION.

THE AFRICAN IS EXTENDING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THUNDER CANYON.

IT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN 2013 AND THE FIRST PHASE WAS FINAL PLANTED IN 2014.

THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS FOR 194, LOTS ON 136 ACRES WITH 63, LOTS AND 31 ACRES ALREADY BEING DEVELOPED.

UH, THERE'S ONE CONNECTION ON THE MIDWEST BOULEVARD.

AND THE SECOND ON THE COBELL IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER, UH, THERE WAS A LARGE AMOUNT OF FLOOD PLAIN THAT RUNS NORTH SOUTH THROUGH THE SITE REQUIRING A BRIDGE OF SOME SORT SHOWN THERE IN THE MIDDLE, CONNECTING THE TWO, UH, PORTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

UH, THE EXTENSION WAS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND AGREED TO BY THE DEVELOPER AS, SINCE THE, THE ORIGINAL PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS DONE SO LONG AGO.

UH, THE EXTENSION HAS SOME MINOR CHANGES, BUT GENERALLY THE LAYOUT LOT SIZES AND NUMBER OF LOTS REMAINS THE SAME.

UH, THERE WERE CONDITIONS PLACED ON THE APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL IN 2013, AND ONE IS AT THE BRIDGE BE COMPLETED BEFORE THE CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE HOME ON THE EAST SIDE AND TWO THAT THE CONNECTION ON COVILLE IS EXIT ONLY.

SO THAT CONNECTION UP IN THE CORNER, THERE IS EXIT ONLY ACCORDING TO THE PREVIOUS APPROVAL,

[00:10:01]

THANK YOU, MISTER ANSWER THEIR QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR THE CITY PLANNER, SAY NONE, THE APPLICANT HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD BEYOND MR. AUNT'S EXPLANATION.

IF YOU DO, COULD YOU STEP UP AND IDENTIFY YOURSELF PLEASE? UM, DERRICK TURNER TURNER COMPANY, WE'VE WORKED SOON AS DECAY DEVELOPMENT RUNS THE PROPERTY, PULL THAT MICROPHONE UP TO YOU.

THANK YOU SO BETTER.

BUT, UM, THE, UH, THE PRIMARY CHANGE THAT WE WORKED ON WAS THE IN ORDER TO MAKE IT ACCOMMODATE THE NEW, UH, THE FIRE CODE ISSUES.

WE, UH, CONNECTED PART OF THE STREETS AND TOOK THE, SOME OF THE CUL-DE-SACS OUT IN ORDER TO GET THE, UH, TO GET FIRE CODE ISSUES THAT WE NEEDED IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF LOTS ON A, ON A DEAD END STREET.

SO THAT WAS WHAT WE TURNED AROUND.

WE ARE FINE WITH THE, UH, EXIT ONLY ON COBELL WAIT.

WE WERE AWARE OF THAT ALL ALONG.

AND, UM, EVERYTHING ELSE IS PRETTY MUCH, I HAVE HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH ONE PROPERTY OWNER AND, UH, UH, WE'VE GOT SOME THINGS THAT WE COULD PROBABLY DO TO HELP THEM ALONG THE WAY TOO.

SO I THINK WE'RE, WE'RE PRETTY GOOD WITH THERE, BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM.

ARE THERE QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR THE APPLICANT AND THE DISCUSSION? I HAVE ONE OF THE DISCUSSIONS YOU'VE HAD WITH A HOMEOWNER OUT THERE, THOSE MAY BE AT FINAL PLAT OR SOMETHING.

UH, IT WAS, UH, UH, ONE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT BACKS DIRECTLY UP TO US.

AND WE CAN ACTUALLY, WHEN WE GO TO THE FINAL PLAT PART OF THAT ROAD, WE'LL ACTUALLY REMOVE BECAUSE WE DON'T NEED IT.

SO IT'LL ACCOMMODATE WHAT THEY NEED.

THERE'S A, THERE'S A UTILITY EASEMENT THAT COMES THROUGH THERE THAT, UH, ACCOMMODATES THE, THE NATURAL GAS LINE FOR THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO IT COMES IN OFF OF COBELL ON THAT STREET AND IT TURNS BACK INTO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO WE'LL HAVE TO, WE HAVE TO ACCOMMODATE THAT EASEMENT LINE, BUT THANK YOU, SIR.

PUBLIC COMMENT, ITEM FIVE C PUBLIC COME.

YES, MA'AM UH, LADY.

AND THEN SIR, IF YOU COULD PULL THAT MICROPHONE DOWN TO YOU.

HI, GOOD EVENING.

I'M KATHY CLARK FLAG AND I LIVE AT 78 0 1 RED CREEK DRIVE.

AND I'M HAPPY TO HEAR THAT IT IS A ONE-WAY ONLY OUT, UM, BACK IN 2015, WHEN WE HAD THIS DISCUSSION BEFORE, UM, WE ASKED HOW WIDE THE ROAD WAS GOING TO BE AND NEVER GOT A RESPONSE BACK.

WE ASKED TO SEE WHAT AN ELEVATION DRAWING OF THAT ENTRANCE WAS GOING TO BE AND NEVER RECEIVED ANY INFORMATION BACK FROM THE BUILDER AT THAT TIME.

AND THAT WAS, UH, ON BEHALF OF US AND THE, UH, THE FRANKLINS THAT LIVE OUT ON COBELL.

UH, WE NEVER GOT ANY INFORMATION ON WHAT THAT WAS GOING TO LOOK LIKE BECAUSE MY PROPERTY SITS UP A COUPLE OF FEET HIGHER THAN WHAT THE PROPERTY OF THUNDER CANYON, WHERE THE ROAD WOULD GO OUT.

AND THEN THE FRANKLINS ACTUALLY SITS DOWN A LITTLE BIT LOWER.

SO WE ASKED TO SEE WHAT THAT WAS GOING TO LOOK IN THE ELEVATION DRAWING AND NO WORD FROM THE BUILDER AT ALL.

UM, AT THE TIME THE BRIDGE IDEA WAS, WAS DROPPED COMPLETELY, UH, BECAUSE OF COST AND THEY WANTED TO MAKE THAT A TWO WAY ENTRY IN AN ENTRY OUT.

LET ME SEE IF WE CAN GET YOU AN ANSWER HERE FOR ME.

UM, AND SO IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT BRIDGE IS GOING TO GO IN.

IF YOU COULD INTRODUCE YOURSELF, PLEASE.

MY NAME IS LEE NEWELL, ND W E L L.

I LOVE IT.

73 16, THUMB THE CANYON, ONE CONCERN.

THEN PHASE ONE, THAT THE RESIDENT HAVE YOU GOT AN EXIT ONLY LOAN CORVELLE THAT'S GOING AND CREATE A LOT OF TRAFFIC COMING THROUGH TAWNY CANYON.

AND WITH KIDS OUT THERE TO CREATE A SAFETY HAZARD.

CURRENTLY, WE HAVE PETERS COMING THROUGH LIKE THEY'RE DRAG RACING THROUGH THE COMMUNITY RIGHT NOW.

WE REQUEST THEM TO HAVE TO BE NOT ON AN EXIT, BUT AN ENTRANCE AS WELL.

THAT'S GONNA ELIMINATE A LOT OF TRAFFIC COMING THROUGH THERE.

CURRENT OUT STREETS ARE DETERIORATING.

THE MORE TRAVEL WE HAVE COME THROUGH THERE, THE MORE THEY'RE GOING TO GO DOWNHILL.

CURRENTLY, WE HAVE A GATED COMMUNITY.

WE HAVE GATED DURING THE, UH, AT NIGHT TIME.

WE OPENED DURING THE DAY AT THE TALKING TO THE CITY OF EDMOND.

WE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN OUR OWN STREETS, UH, INCREASED THE COST AND PHASE ONE, HAVING OUR STREETS REPAIRED.

SO WE PREFER TO HAVE A INTEREST AND EXIT ON CORVELLE ROAD, IF ANY WAY POSSIBLE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU, MR. NEWELL, ARE THERE OTHERS? YES, SIR.

HELLO.

MY NAME IS WILLIAM WAY TO LIVE AT 78, 10 REDBUD CREEK.

UM, WE HAD THESE DISCUSSIONS BACK IN THE CITY COUNCIL.

UM, HOWEVER MANY YEARS AGO, I WASN'T AWARE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED ANY STREET, UM, EXITING TO COBELL.

UH, AS I REMEMBER THAT WAS, UM, AN ITEM THAT WAS LEFT OPEN FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION, BECAUSE THERE WAS AN ISSUE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT YOU COULD PUT A TWO WAY STREET BETWEEN, UM, THE FLEX AND THE FRANKLINS PROPERTY.

UM, THERE WAS A MATTER OF ABOUT FIVE FEET THAT IT WAS NOT WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THAT.

[00:15:01]

UM, AT THE TIME MR. DODSON WAS DEVELOPED.

I DON'T KNOW IF HE'S STILL A DEVELOPER OR NOT.

UM, THAT'S A PROBLEM FOR THOSE OF US THAT LIVE ALONG IN THAT AREA, BECAUSE AS THE GENTLEMEN JUST GOT UP, THERE'S ALWAYS SAFETY CONCERNS WITH YOUNG CHILDREN LIVING VERY CLOSE TO THAT PROPOSED STREET.

THE BRIDGE IS STILL IN THAT BRIDGE IS STILL IN NOW AT THE TIME, IT WAS NOT AT THE TIME THE BRIDGE HAD BEEN REMOVED FROM CONSIDERATION.

BUT IT IS NOW.

UM, EXIT ONLY MY ONLY QUESTION WOULD BE, HOW DO YOU CONTROL THAT? IT'S EXIT ONLY, UM, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE, UM, AS THE GENTLEMAN JUST SAID, HE HAS CONCERNS WITHIN THUNDER CANYON.

WE HAVE CONCERNS WITHIN RED BIKE CANYON ABOUT TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FOR OUR CHILDREN.

UM, BEYOND THAT, UM, THE OTHER CONCERNS I HAVE REALLY DON'T WARRANT A LOT OF DISCUSSION.

IN TERMS OF THE CONNECTABILITY HERE FOR THE FIRE, BECAUSE BEFORE IT WAS THESE CUL-DE-SACS THAT WERE HERE, HERE, AND HERE, THERE WAS, YOU HAVE ALL THESE WALKS RIGHT THERE.

YES, SIR.

ARE THERE OTHERS? ARE THERE OTHERS? OKAY.

UH, MR. TURNER, MR. KENNIS, WHO'S THE, AND I WILL SAY THIS, THIS IS AN EXTENSION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT.

THERE'S GOING TO BE ANOTHER, AT LEAST ANOTHER BITE OF THE APPLE, PERHAPS TO THERE, THERE MAY BE SOME CHANGES TO ACCOMMODATE SOME OF THE CONCERNS AS WE MOVE FROM PRELIMINARY TO FINAL.

THIS IS SIMPLY AN EXTENSION THAT THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERING TONIGHT.

HOW LONG HAS THE EXTENSION FOR TWO YEARS, TWO YEARS, FOR TWO YEARS.

SO THIS ISN'T ANYTHING FINAL.

THIS IS AN EXTENSION OF THE PRELIMINARY THAT'S ON THE BOOKS.

THERE'LL BE SOME CHANGES COMING FORWARD.

CORRECT.

AND WE'LL HAVE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THOSE.

SO DON'T, DON'T PANIC THINKING.

THIS IS THE FINAL MR. TURNER.

UM, MR. , IF YOU COULD USE YOUR CURSOR AND PUT WHERE THAT EXIT GOES OUT WITH A LOT START, RIGHT, RIGHT.

IN THAT AREA RIGHT THERE.

ONE OF THE THINGS WE'VE DONE IS WE'VE GOT AN 80 FOOT RIGHT-AWAY IN THERE THAT ALLOWS US TO HAVE, THERE'S A, WHETHER IT'S POT, WHETHER IT'S ONLY EXIT OR ENTRY EXIT, EITHER ONE, YOU STILL NEED TO HAVE A TURNAROUND CAPABILITIES THERE.

SO WE HAVE PUSHED THAT BACK AND MADE THAT OPEN TOO.

SO IT CAN BE TURNED AROUND IN.

SO IF SOMEBODY DOES COME UP THERE AND THEY CAN'T GET IN, THEY TURN AROUND AND GO RIGHT BACK OUT.

SO IT'S A TYPICAL GATED TYPE ENTRY.

UH, MR. MR. DODSON IS NO LONGER INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT, SO HE'S NOT AROUND.

UM, THE, UM, WE'RE GOOD WITH EITHER WAY ON EMPIRE.

THE HOMEOWNERS HAD TALKED TO US ABOUT HAVING IT BE OPEN.

UH, AND THEN I THINK AT THE TIME, IN 2013, IT WAS TALKED ABOUT JUST BEING A ONE WAY AS OPPOSED TO A TWO-WAY, IT WILL ACCOMMODATE EITHER OR, AND IT REALLY JUST KIND OF COMES DOWN TO WHAT THE, THE CITY AND PROBABLY WHAT THE CITY ENGINEERS WOULD WALK.

ONCE WE GET OUT THE COBELL, UH, IT'S NOT REALLY AS MUCH OF A PROBLEM UP IN THE PROJECT.

IT'S DOWN ON THE COBELL EXIT SIDE.

IT'S WHERE THAT ACCESS WOULD BE THE, UH, THE BRIDGE AREA THAT W WHEN WE TALK BRIDGE THAT THAT COULD BE BOX CULVERT, UH, BULKHEADING BOX CULVERT.

IT COULD BE THAT OR BRIDGE WORKING ON BOTH OF THE DIFFERENT IDEAS ABOUT WHICH THAT COULD BE.

SO IS THIS PARK, UH, GATED AS WELL ON THAT COVID YES.

EVERYTHING'S GATED.

OUR INTENT IS TO HAVE EVERYTHING GATED AND HAVE IT ALL ENTERED THROUGH THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO PRIMARY FEATURE COMED OFF OF, OFF OF METRO SCHOOL, BOARD, AUGUST WITH KATIE TO CONTROL THE NUMBER YOU CAN'T GET IN SOME OF THE 17 THAT'S EXACTLY IT.

I MEAN, WE HAD, UH, WE HAD TALKED ABOUT DURING THE UPFRONT CONSTRUCTION TIME TO BE ABLE TO USE IT AS A CONSTRUCTION INTEREST TO TRY TO KEEP SOME OF THAT TRAFFIC DOWN, BUT, UM, IN THE LONG RUN IT COULD BE EITHER, OR IT COULD BE CLOSED OR IT COULD BE OPEN.

SO I WOULD JUST, I WAS GOING TO ADD, UM, WHAT YOU SAID, YOUR, YOU TALKED ABOUT HOMEOWNER, THEIR RED, AND YOU MIGHT ACCOMMODATE THAT.

YOU KNOW, THERE WASN'T A LOT MORE CUL-DE-SACS THAT, THAT NORTH END, THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION WHEN WE PASSED THAT LONG TIME AGO, THEY DIDN'T, THEY DID THAT TO ACCOMMODATE NOT HAVING THAT ROAD RIGHT NEXT TO THEIR HOUSES.

SO WE DID ON THE, UM, DR.

ON THE SHOULDER, IF YOU'LL SEE ON HERE, THESE PROPERTY OWNERS, THESE PROPERTY LINES ARE SET.

SO YOU CAN SEE, CAUSE THEY'RE NOT ON THAT MAP.

SO YOU CAN SEE THE APARTMENT OR THE COLBY WAS THIS PROPERTY OVER HERE.

AND WHAT WE REALIZED IS THE ORIGINAL STREET CAME IN AND TURNED AND WENT THIS WAY.

RIGHT.

AND WE BROUGHT IT ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

AND THEN WE BROUGHT WE DOWN THE STREET THERE TOO.

THIS COULD ACTUALLY BE ELIMINATED.

AND SO IT WOULD JUST EXTEND THAT EASEMENT DOWN.

AND THEN INSTEAD OF HAVING HOUSES BACK AFTER THAT, WE'LL HAVE HIM GO EAST AND WEST, BUT DON'T MISS OUT.

MR. WATSON, WILL YOU BET THAT UTILITY EASEMENT COMES IN ABOUT RIGHT HERE, WE TOOK THE CUL-DE-SACS WERE SHOVED ALL THE WAY UP INTO THE END AND THE NUMBER OF WALKS THAT YOU HAD, UM, YOU DIDN'T CHANGE, BUT YOU WERE PUSHING THOSE HOUSES RIGHT BACK AGAINST THAT PROPERTY LINE.

WHAT WE DID IS WE ACCOMMODATED WHAT THE CITY NEEDED

[00:20:01]

THEY'RE ALL ON A SINGLE SCREEN.

SO NOW WITH THE HUNTER, I KNOW YOU GOT A LOUD VOICE, BUT YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO USE THAT MICROPHONE.

OH.

SO BY, BY CHANGING THE, THE COLDEST X, THE OTHER THING WE DID WAS WE TOOK THOSE LAWS THAT ARE ON THOSE PROPERTY LINES, AND WE'VE MADE 150 FOOT DEEP.

WE HAD A 30 FOOT DEEPER THAN THE NORMAL LAW.

SO WE HAVE A BUFFER AREA THAT WE'RE GOING TO LEAVE IN THERE.

WHEN WE GO TO FINAL PLAT, WE'LL HAVE A SECTION BEHIND THERE THAT WE'LL LEAVE, THAT THEY CAN'T BUILD ON.

THERE'LL BE DEEPER THAN A TYPICAL REAR BLOG.

AND THEN I GUESS TAVEL IS EXIT ONLY, CORRECT.

AND THEN TWO ACCESS POINTS ON MIDWEST.

AM I THERE'S ONE ON MIDWEST, ONE ON CAVELL.

AND THE ONE CAVELL WAS A, WAS A, UH, IN 2013 WAS SAID IT WAS AN EXIT ONLY.

ARE THERE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION? OKAY.

IF YOU WOULDN'T TAKE, TAKE FIVE MINUTES AND VISIT WITH THE LADY ABOUT THE ELEVATION THAT SHE HAD ASKED ABOUT.

UH, DID YOU STAY TOO LONG? I'M SORRY.

THERE'S ONE ON COBELL ONE ON THE MIDWEST BULWARK AND THEN ONE ON ONE EACH.

HOW MANY AUDITS, SIR, SIR, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO COME UP HERE AND ASK THAT QUESTION.

YOU HAD YOUR OPPORTUNITY IF YOU MET SCOPE, BUT COME ON BACK UP HERE AND GET THAT QUICK.

WE GOT TO HAVE IT ON THE RECORD.

COME UP.

IS THAT OKAY NOW, COME ON.

THEN I HAVE ONE OTHER COMMENT.

I DON'T WANT TO GO OUT.

I GOTTA BE HOME FOR SOME PUTS OUT A SILVER ALERT.

SO JUSTIN SPARKS, I AM AT 7,400, UH, THUNDER CANYON AVENUE.

WE JUST MOVED IN A MONTH AGO.

UH, THE FIRST QUESTION WAS HOW MANY OR HOW MANY, UM, ENTRANCE EXITS OUR TOTAL PLAN AGAINST MIDWEST? I THINK HE SAID, I JUST DIDN'T KNOW.

ERIC HAD A, WOULD ASK YOUR SECOND QUESTION AND WE'LL GET THEM BOTH ANSWERED AT THE SAME TIME.

CERTAINLY.

UM, THE SECOND ONE IS A POINT OF CONCERN.

PERHAPS WE JUST MOVED IN A MONTH AGO.

WE ARE AT THE, YEAH, WE ARE HERE, RIGHT? WE ARE RIGHT HERE, LEE.

IS THAT RIGHT? OKAY.

RIGHT HERE.

SO THIS IS GOING TO BE THAT MAIN DRAG THROUGH, UH, THAT WE'RE RIGHT THERE ON THAT STREET.

MY CONCERN IS THIS, MY SON'S ALREADY HAD TO BAIL OFF THIS BIKE ONCE JUST WITH THE CURRENT RESIDENCE.

AND NOW WE CREATE, I'M SORRY, MY SON'S ALREADY JUMPED OFF OF HIS BIKE ONCE, WHEN HE GOT SCARED FROM THE TRAFFIC.

AND NOW YOU GOT THAT BRIDGE COMING ACROSS, THAT THING LOOKS LIKE A SPEED TIME ON PEOPLE, ON A COMMUTE FROM WORK, OR, YOU KNOW, SO THE CONCERN IS JUST THIS.

AS YOU DEVELOP IT, PLEASE KEEP IT IN MIND.

PEOPLE, PEOPLE SPEED.

THAT WAS IT.

MA'AM OKAY.

WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AFTER YOUR REDO.

I JUST HAVE A QUESTION.

WHAT IS THE STANDARD FOR THE WIDTH OF THE ROAD? IF IT'S A SINGLE ROAD VERSUS A TWO LANE.

ALL RIGHT, WE'RE GOING TO GET YOU AN ANSWER.

UH, MR. TURNER, YOU'RE A GOOD CIVIC CITIZEN.

TALK TO THAT MAN ABOUT THAT SAFETY FOR HIS KID ON HIS BICYCLE.

THE CURVING UNDER IS 26 FEET WIDE OR OTHER TYPES OF SECTIONS THAT ARE LESS.

FIRST OFF SHOW, MR. JONES COULD SHOW HIS CURSOR ON MIDWEST BOULEVARD.

AGAIN, I THINK THERE'S A LITTLE CONFUSION BECAUSE THAT'S THE ENTRANCE RIGHT THERE.

THE THING BELOW THAT THERE, THAT MIGHT APPEAR TO BE AN ENTRANCE.

IT'S JUST, UH, IT'S A, UH, UH, UTILITY EASEMENT.

SO THERE'S ONLY ONE ENTRANCE ON THAT ROAD.

THAT'S THAT IS ALL FLOOD PLAIN.

AND YOU CAN SEE THE DASH LINE THAT COMES UP THROUGH THERE.

IT'S ALL FLOODED UP AROUND THE BACKSIDE OF THIS PROPERTY.

SO THERE IS ONLY ONE ENTRANCE TO THE CURRENT ENTRANCE IT'S ON MIDWEST BOULEVARD IS THE ENTRANCE WE'LL USE.

UH, WE HAVE ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE DONE IS WE'VE, WE'VE RECONNECTED WITH THE, UH, ASSOCIATION.

THEY NEVER REALLY HAD THE ASSOCIATION PUT TOGETHER.

THEY HADN'T FILED A RECORD, BUT THEY WEREN'T OPERATING IT.

AND WE HAVE GONE IN AND MET WITH THEM.

AND NOW WE HAVE THE HOMEOWNERS INVOLVED AND WE'VE MET WITH THEM THREE TIMES ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS.

AND ONE OF THINGS THAT HELPS YOU WITH YOUR SPEED IS WE'VE GOT TO GET THE PEOPLE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO HELP MONITOR THAT BECAUSE IT'S A DIFFICULT THING TO MONITOR FOR ANYBODY.

BUT, UH, I THINK WE CAN HANDLE THAT PRETTY EASILY ONCE THE NEIGHBORS GET INVOLVED.

AND THEY'VE BEEN REALLY, REALLY GOOD ABOUT COMING IN AND HELPING US WITH THE ENTRANCE AND ALL THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.

SO WE'VE GOTTEN A VERY GOOD RESPONSE FROM THEM AS FAR AS THE STREET WITH GOING OUT THAT NORTH END, UH, TYPICALLY THE 20 MR. RONNIE, 26 FEET AND EMILY IS THREE.

[00:25:01]

IT CAN BE A RURAL TYPE STANDARD, OR YOU COULD EVEN HAVE SOME SORT OF FIRE LANE THROUGH THERE WHERE YOU CAN'T PARK ON IT.

IT CAN BE REDUCED AS WELL, AS LONG AS THE FIRETRUCK AND USE IT.

SO IT REALLY DEPENDS ON WHEN THEY START THEIR DESIGN PROCESS, WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE DOING THROUGH THERE, HOW IT'S MORE TOPS LIKE 26 FEET WITH CURVES FOR A STANDARD RESIDENTIAL STRAIGHT STANDARD OR STANDARD RESIDENTIAL STREETS.

WHAT WAS IT FOR TWO? THAT'S WHAT IT IS.

66 FEET, A STANDARD CITY STREET WITH CURBS TRAFFIC, BOTH WAYS, 26 FEET.

AND WHEN WE COME TO FINAL GOAL, WE'LL HAVE A LITTLE BIT, A LOT MORE DETAILED.

WE'LL HAVE SHOWN THAT YOU'RE IN PRELIMINARY NOW, BUT WHEN WE GET TO THE DETAIL AND SHOW THAT, BUT THE 0.6 WEEKS WOULD GO OUT.

OTHER COMMISSION COMMENTS, AGAIN, FOLKS, THIS IS AN EXTENSION.

I ONLY HAVE A PRELIMINARY, WE'LL BE BACK FOR A FINAL.

SO THERE'LL BE ALL SORTS OF EYES, UH, TO REVIEW THIS FROM THE CITY STAFF PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL, THE CITY COUNCIL TO THE EXTENSION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN.

IS THERE A MOTION AND A SECOND ON ITEM NINE C TO APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT? WELL, EXCEPT FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 12TH, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12TH, CORRECT.

SANDRA JOHNSON, MS. JOHNSON.

YOU BET.

THANKS.

[D. Case #Z22-00014 Public Hearing and Consideration for Rezoning from “A” Single Family Dwelling District to “PUD Z22-00014” Planned Unit Development for Wade Martin Commercial Center, located on the south side of East 2nd Street, west of Wade Martin Road. (Sondra Johnson)]

UH, 90 CASES, Z TWO, TWO DASH TRIPLE 0 1 4 TODDLER CARE AND CONSIDERATION FOR REZONING FROM A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT, P U D Z 22 DASH TRIPLE ZERO.

ONE FOR PD FOR WADE MARTIN COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SECOND WEST OF WHITE MARTIN.

THE APPLICANT'S PRESENT MR. ANS NINE DATE PLEASE.

IT'S ITEM NINE D AND I WAS READING THE DESCRIPTION FOR NINE DAYS.

THAT'S ON THE PRINTED AGENDA, K 90, AND MR. ANTS IS GOING TO GIVE THE CITY'S EXPLANATION OF THAT ITEM.

UH, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PUD TO ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL USES ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST SECOND STREET IN WADE MARTINS, THE AREA HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW ON THE MAP.

NOW THE PUD IS ONE TRACK THAT SHOWS A TYPICAL RETAIL USES ALONG SECOND STREET, AND THEN SELF STORAGE USES BEHIND, UH, THE PUD COMMITS TO THE BUILDING BEING NO MORE THAN TWO STORIES IN HEIGHT AND LESS THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE.

UH, IT ALSO COMMITS TO A SITE PROOF FENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY, AND THE PD ALSO COMMITS TO THE FA TO FOLLOW IN THE IWAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AS THE SITE DEVELOPS.

UH, THE SITE IS SURROUNDED BY IWAN AND ZONINGS TO THE EAST AND WEST AND A SINGLE FAMILY TO THE SOUTH.

UH, THE MASTER PLAN DOES SHOW AN ENTRANCE ON THE SECOND STREET, BUT THE APPLICANT WAS INFORMED, UH, THAT AT THE POINT OF SITE PLAN THAT WILL REQUIRE A VARIANCE THAT WILL LIKELY NOT BE SUPPORTED BY STAFF AT THE SITE DOES HAVE ACCESS TO WADE MARTIN AND AN ACCESS EASEMENT WITH THE DRIVE TO THE WEST.

UH, THE SITE HAS DESIGNATED A SUBURBAN INFILL AND THE EDMUND 28 PLAN, WHICH ENCOURAGES A PUD TO MAKE SURE COMPATIBILITY IS ACHIEVED WITH THE DEVELOPED AREAS AROUND IT.

IN THIS CASE, THAT WOULD BE THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTAL LAW.

SECOND, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.

THANK YOU, MISTER ANSWER THEIR QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR THE CITY PLANNER.

UH, JUST A QUICK QUESTION AND INCLUDED IN THAT PART, I WOULD ASSUME THAT THEY WOULD ALL BE, UM, UH, COMPLIANT WITH THE LANDSCAPING.

YOU KINDLY INTRODUCE YOURSELF.

THEY COMMITTED TO MEET THE LANDSCAPING CODE AS A TRUE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.

MR. WALL.

SORRY.

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD BEYOND THE CITY PLANNERS EXPLANATION? OKAY.

ARE THERE QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR THE APPLICANT C NINE PUBLIC COMMENT, FIVE D BUT YES, SIR.

MY NAME IS DONALD CALMLY AND I OWN THE LAND ON 300 WADE MARTIN ROAD.

AND I WAS CURIOUS WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN TO THE ROAD NOW, CAUSE IT'S A LITTLE SMALL GRAVEL ROAD RIGHT NOW.

WE'LL GET YOU AN ANSWER ON THAT ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT.

SEE NONE.

HELLO, CHUCK WEIBEL WITH SRB ENGINEERING.

MR. MANOCK DO YOU HAVE AN ANSWER ON THAT OR DOES, IS THAT THE APPLICANT? SHOULD HE RESPOND TO THAT? PROBABLY THE ADVOCATES OF PRIVACY.

STEP UP HERE.

THAT'S A PRIVATE STREET.

IF HE COULD ANSWER MR. CONLEY'S QUESTION PLEASE.

[00:30:07]

OH, 100 NORTHEAST FIFTH, FIFTH STREET, OKLAHOMA CITY.

JUST ONE SECOND, MR. CAN YOU HEAR THAT IN THE BACK, SIR? OKAY.

ALL RIGHT, GO AHEAD.

YEAH.

UM, ON THE WAY, MARTIN, UM, YEAH, WE'RE GOING TO WIDEN THAT OUT.

UH, RIGHT NOW IT'S 20 FEET WIDE AND WE'RE GOING TO ADD ANOTHER 20 FEET TO IT AND THEN PAVE AT 24 FEET WIDE, UH, TO OUR SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.

ALRIGHT.

ON, ON MY PROPERTY THAT GOES DOWN THE LENGTH OF WADE MARTIN ROAD IN THE NORTH.

I RUNS NORTH AND SOUTH.

YEAH.

UM, DO I LOSE MY FENCE? DO I LOSE ANY OF MY PROPERTY ON THAT? HOW DOES THAT WORK COME ON THE WEST SIDE? UH, NO, YOU WILL NOT LOSE ANY OF YOUR PROPERTY, UM, OR YOUR FENCE BECAUSE WE'LL MAINTAIN THE EXISTING 20 FOOT WIDE AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO ADD TO THE WEST OF IT.

SO THE EAST PART OF IT WILL MAINTAIN AND KEEP THE SAME.

AND WE'RE JUST GOING INTO OUR PROPERTY, ADDING 20 FEET TO WADE BARTON, UH, RIGHT AWAY.

GENTLEMAN'S NODDING HIS HEAD, UH, ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR EXCUSE ME.

WELL, NOW, NOW YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE POP OUT HERE.

YOU SHOULD LET HER COME UP BACK TO FIRST PLACE.

HOLD THAT MICROPHONE.

WE KNOW YOUR LAST NAME.

MARTIN IS AN OKLAHOMA CITY ROAD.

IT'S NOT AN EDMUND ROAD OR HAS THAT BEEN CHANGED COUNTY AND YOU WILL BE MA'AM AND WHO WILL BE MAINTAINING THAT ROAD? THEY'RE GOING TO MAINTAIN THAT ROAD.

HE SAID THAT A MOMENT AGO THAT WHEN THEY WIDENED THAT THEY'RE GOING TO MAINTAIN THE ROAD.

THERE'S A BIT CLEARER.

HE'S ONLY GOING TO MAINTAIN THE ROAD THAT HE, THE NEXT TO HIS PROPERTY.

YOU'RE GOING TO MAINTAIN IT FARTHER TO THE SOUTH, CORRECT? NO PROBLEM.

YEAH.

OKAY, SIR.

DO YOU WANT TO COME BACK UP HERE? ARE YOU FINISHED? OKAY.

UH, WE'RE CLOSING PUBLIC COMMENT.