[1. Call to Order:]
[00:00:07]
AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE WILL CALL TO ORDER THE TUESDAY, JULY 18TH, 2023 MEETING OF THE EDMOND PLANNING COMMISSION.
[2. Approval of Minutes: June 20, 2023]
UM, FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM JUNE 20TH, 2023.HAS EVERYONE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE? IF SO, ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
SECOND, AND IF EVERYBODY OUT THERE COULD PLEASE BE VERY, VERY QUIET WHILE WE'RE TALKING, IT'S SORT OF HARD TO UH, HEAR AND WE CAN HEAR YOU ALL REAL WELL THIS DIRECTION.
SECOND, AND THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO.
[3. Continuance Docket: (Items on the continuance docket will be voted on as a group, unless members of the commission or the public request individual action on an item).]
UH, IT BRINGS US TO THE CONTINUANCE DOCKET.THERE ARE THREE ITEMS ON THE CONTINUANCE DOCKET CASE NUMBER Z 23 DASH 0 0 0 0 9 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR REZONING FROM GA, GENERAL AGRICULTURAL P U D FOR ARCADIA LAKE TRAIL, SOUTH OF SECOND AND COOK TRAIL AND CASE NUMBER S P 22 DASH 0 0 0 5 1.
PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR DUNCAN DONUTS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF KELLY AVENUE, NORTH OF WEST 15TH STREET, O K D HOLDINGS, LLC, AS THE APPLICANT, UH, THE FIRST ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AND THE SECOND ITEM IS GOING TO BE CONTINUED TO THE AUGUST 8TH, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THOSE TWO ITEMS? MOTION TO APPROVE SECOND.
AND BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO, THAT MOTION IS PASSED.
[4. Public Hearing - Consent Docket: (Items on the consent docket are recommended for approval by the Staff and will be voted on as a group, unless members of the commission or the public request individual action on an item).]
THE PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT DOCKET.THERE ARE THREE ITEMS ON THAT.
UH, CASE NUMBER DD 23 DASH 0 0 0 0 6 CONSIDERATION FOR DEED CERTIFICATION FOR THE PADDOCKS AT OAK TREE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WATERLOO ROAD, WEST OF KELLY AVENUE.
TITLE IS THE APPLICANT CASE NUMBER PR 23 DASH 0 0 0 0 8.
CONSIDERATION OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR BLACK JACK OAKS LOCATED EAST OF BRYAN AVENUE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF KICKING BIRD ROAD.
JUNIPER KICKING BIRD, L L L P IS THE APPLICANT.
AND CASE NUMBER PR 23 DASH 0 0 0 0 9 CONSIDERATION FOR A FINAL PLAT OF 1 0 3 NORTH BROADWAY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BROADWAY AND HEARD, UH, ALL OF THOSE ARE ON THE CONSENT DOCKET.
DO ANY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY REASON THAT WE WOULD NEED TO PULL ANY OF THOSE? UH, SEEING NONE.
IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC THAT BELIEVES WE NEED TO PULL ANY OF THOSE AND IT APPEARS NOT.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THE CONSENT DOCKET? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
AND THOSE ITEMS ARE APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO.
UH, ITEM B AND ITEM C WILL BOTH BE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 14TH OF THIS YEAR.
IF ANYONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR THEY WANT TO APPEAR, FIRST ITEM
[A. Case #ES23-00008 Public Hearing and Consideration of an Easement Closing for St. Mary’s Episcopal School Addition located at 505 East Covell Road. (St. Mary’s Episcopal School) (Ward 1) ]
ON THE PUBLIC HEARING.DISCUSSION DOCKET IS CASE NUMBER ES 23 DASH 0 0 0 0 8 PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION FOR AN EASEMENT.
MARY'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL EDITION, LOCATED AT 5 0 5 EAST COVE ROAD.
MARY'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL IS THE APPLICANT.
UH, APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO CLOSE A PART OF AN EASEMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RECENT BUILDING EDITION.
IT'S THE AREA HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW RIGHT THERE.
UM, THE EASEMENT ONCE COVERED A PUBLIC WATER LINE.
THAT LINE HAS SINCE BEEN RE RELOCATED ALONG WITH THE, UH, ADDITION TO THE SCHOOL AND THE EASEMENT IS NO LONGER NEEDED.
UH, NONE OF THE UTILITIES SAW ANY REASON TO KEEP IT AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
UH, DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTION OF THE APPLICANT AT THIS POINT IN TIME? SEEING NONE.
IS THERE ANYTHING THE APPLICANT WISHES TO ADD FURTHER OR DO THEY WANT TO RELY UPON THE STATEMENTS THE CITY'S STAFF SEE ANY APPLICANT HAS NOTHING TO SAY.
ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THIS GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WISH TO BE THERE SPEAK FOR A PARTICULAR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? SEE NONE.
DO I HAVE A MOTION? MAKE A MOTION.
UH, THAT ITEM IS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO AND THAT IS FINISHED ACTUALLY, I'M SORRY.
THAT WILL BE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 14TH OF THIS YEAR.
[B. Case #Z22-00031 Public Hearing and Consideration for a Rezoning from “A” Single Family Dwelling District to “PUD Z22-00031” Planned Unit Development, located at 307 East Clegern Avenue. (Michael Adel) (Ward 1) ]
ITEM B, CASE NUMBER Z 22 DASH 0 0 0 3 1 PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION FOR A REZONING FROM A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT, PUD Z 22 DASH 0 0 0 3 1.PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 3 0 7 EAST CLAREN AVENUE.
UH, MICHAEL LIDDELL IS THE APPLICANT.
[00:05:01]
MR. S? OKAY.UH, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A P U D AT 3 0 7 EAST CLAREN, WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR THE ADDITION OF A TWO-STORY DUPLEX ON THE LOT AND RETAIN THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE.
UH, THE P U D IS LIMITED TO THREE UNITS AND THE EXISTING LOT WILL NOT BE SPLIT IN THE FUTURE.
UH, ACCESS WILL BE FROM THE EXISTING DRIVE.
UH, IN THE AREA THERE'S A MIX OF SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY STRUCTURES WITH THE, UH, DENSER BRADFORD VILLAGE, UH, A BLOCK TO THE NORTH.
THE EDMUND PLAN DESIGNATION AREA IS UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH SUGGESTS MORE INTENSE ZONING.
DISTRICTS SUCH AS B OR DUPLEX ZONING OR C3, HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY ARE APPROPRIATE AND ENCOURAGES THE DENSIFICATION OF THE AREA DUE TO ITS RELATIONSHIP TO DOWNTOWN AND THE CAMPUS, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY OF CITY STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? HEY, RANDY, DO WE HAVE A SIDEWALK THAT'S REQUIRED THERE ON JACKSON OR, I KNOW WE'VE BEEN THIS SINCE IT'S ON JACKSON THERE.
THE SIDEWALK IS ON THE OTHER PROPERTY ACROSS THE WAY.
UH, TYPICALLY WITH A RESIDENTIAL PERMIT, A SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED TO BE PUT IN.
SO WHEN THEY COME IN TO PULL THAT PERMIT, THEY'LL HAVE TO PUT ONE IN.
ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? I'M SORRY, ONE MORE.
ANY UH, CLEANUP ON THAT ALLEYWAY THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE? IS THAT REQUIRED ON THE STEEL OR THAT IS NOT REQUIRED IN THIS IS A SATISFACTORY CONDITION, I GUESS, OR, WELL, THAT'S DEBATABLE, BUT IT'S NOT REQUIRED TO BE IMPROVED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
YEAH, AS LONG AS IT'S NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE, TYPICALLY IT DOESN'T REQUIRE ANY TYPE OF UPGRADING.
UH, DOES THE APPLICANT CARE TO ADD ANYTHING FURTHER? WOULD YOU LIKE TO RELY UPON THE COMMENTS, THE CITY STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WE SHOULD SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? YES.
MS. WATS, WHAT, 7,000 SQUARE FOOT, RANDY? I BELIEVE SO.
UH, IS THERE PARKING ON THIS, UH, AREA, THE STREET OR WHAT ARE WE DOING FOR PARKING? UH, I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE ON SITE, BUT MAYBE THE APPLICANT COULD SPEAK TO THAT.
I THINK IT'S ON THE, UH, NORTH SIDE.
AND UM, IS THERE AN ALLEY BETWEEN THE TWO HOUSES OR BE THERE'S AN ALLEY TO THE NORTH LOT.
YEAH, ALLEY DIRECTLY BEHIND WHERE THE, UH, BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE.
THAT BLUE LINE WHERE THE, WHERE IS THAT WHERE THE ALLEY IS? NO, NO, THAT ALLEY'S RIGHT HERE.
SO THERE'S NOTHING WILL THEY ACCESS THEIR PARKING THROUGH THAT ALLEY? YES.
SORT OF THE INTERESTING DESIGN DOES THIS, THE PROPOSED PARKING IS ON THE NORTH END FOR ALL THREE UNITS NOW THERE'S EXISTING DRIVE RIGHT HERE FOR THE HOUSE AND THEN THE PARKING FOR THE NEW BUILDING TO BE OFF THE ALLEY.
ARE THERE ANY IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED FOR THE ALLEY? NO.
AND HOW MANY PARKING SPACES THAT PROPOSED PARKING HAVE FOR THEM? UH, LOOKS LIKE ROUGHLY TWO.
I'M LOOKING AT THE MEASUREMENT, RIGHT? IT SAYS 22 FEET WIDE THERE, THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR TWO PARKING SPOTS.
YOU HAVE TWO HERE, WHICH IS SERVED BY THAT PARKING, AND THEN THIS HOUSE HERE, WHICH IS SERVED BY THIS DRIVE.
SO THE EXISTING HOUSE IS JUST HAVING THIS ON THE NORTH END, DOESN'T IT? YES.
SO THERE'S REALLY ONLY TWO UNITS.
IT'S A DUPLEX THAT'S STACKED AND THEN THIS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE THAT STAY HERE.
SORT OF LIKE THE OLD GARAGE APARTMENTS THEY USED TO DO ALL OVER, BACK IN THAT AREA.
SO IS THAT A VARIANCE ON THE PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FOR A DUPLEX? NO, IT'S NOT.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WISH TO SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AND I BELIEVE THE, UH, ISSUES RATHER THAN HAVING THE APPLICANT ADDRESS THAT I DID CITY STAFF HANDLE THE ISSUES OF PARKING FOR YOU SUFFICIENTLY? I JUST, DOES HE OWN THAT? IS THIS A IS THIS A BUSINESS CHANGE OR IS THIS, UH, NEW OWNERSHIP? I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE, WE GOT HERE.
WELL, IT, IT'S, UH, IT, IT'S NOT NECESSARILY AN INCONSISTENT USE WITH WHAT THEY'VE BEEN DOING, UH, THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND OTHER AREAS AND, AND IT'S, UH, CONSISTENT WITH WHAT PEOPLE USED TO DO WITH GARAGE APARTMENTS ABOVE, UH, THINGS LIKE THAT.
BUT I, I'M NOT FOR SURE THAT THE QUESTION'S NECESSARILY RELEVANT.
BUT SIR, ARE YOU A NEW OWNER OF THE PROPERTY? NO.
WE'VE OWNED THAT PROPERTY FOR THE LAST
[00:10:01]
SEVERAL YEARS AND DECIDED WE WANTED TO TRY TO DEVELOP IT OUT ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE PROPERTY.UH, DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AT THIS POINT IN TIME ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? AND IF NOT, DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
AND THAT IS APPROVED BY VODA FOUR TO ZERO.
AND THAT WILL BE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 14TH.
[C. Case #ES23-00009 Public Hearing and Consideration of closing a public right-of-way for 103 N. Broadway, a mixed-use development to be located north of Hurd Street and west of Broadway. (103 Broadway, LLC) (Ward 1) ]
TWO ITEMS ON THE AGENDA.ITEMS C AND D CASE NUMBER ES 23 DASH 0 0 0 0 9 PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF CLOSING A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FOR 1 0 3 NORTH BROADWAY, A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT TO BE LOCATED NORTH OF HERD STREET AND WEST OF BROADWAY.
UH, 1 0 3 BROADWAY LLC IS THE APPLICANT AND THE COMPANION ITEM CASE NUMBER ES 23 DASH 0 0 0 1 0 PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF CLOSING A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FOR 1 0 3 NORTH BROADWAY, A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT TO BE LOCATED NORTH OF HERD STREET AND WEST OF BROADWAY.
AGAIN, SAME APPLICANT, 1 0 3 BROADWAY LLC.
OKAY, UH, SO THIS IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HERD AND BROADWAY.
UH, THERE WAS RECENTLY A SITE PLAN APPROVED THROUGH URBAN BOARD FOR THIS, UH, SPACE OUTLINED IN YELLOW.
UH, AS A PART OF THAT, UH, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO APPROVE A COUPLE OF PIECES OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY TO BE CLOSED IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT.
IT'S A MULTI-USE BUILDING AND THE REQUEST WILL ALLOW THE STOOPS AND SMALL AREAS IN FRONT OF THE BUILDINGS TO BE USED AND TECHNICALLY NOT TO BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
UH, THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING AN EASEMENT TO COVER THE AREAS, UH, TO PROTECT A WATER LINE THAT'S ACTUALLY OUT HERE CLOSER TO HERD, UH, THE APPLICANT.
AND, UH, THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CAME UP WITH THAT SOLUTION AS A WAY OF ACCOMMODATING THE NEW DEVELOPMENT AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL NOW.
DO ANY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTION OF CITY STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? UH, SEEING NONE.
DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD ANYTHING FURTHER? NO.
AND DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WISH TO SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT SCENE? NONE.
DO ANY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS THEY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE PRIOR TO A MOTION SCENE? NONE.
DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE BOTH ITEMS. I'LL SECOND.
AND THOSE TWO ITEMS VOTED ON TOGETHER ARE APPROVED BY VOTE OF FOUR 20 AND THEY WILL BE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 14TH.
[E. Public Hearing and Consideration of modifications to the Central Edmond Urban District Boundary. (City of Edmond) (Ward 1)]
TO ITEM E ON THE DOCKET PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO THE CENTRAL EDMOND URBAN DISTRICT BOUNDARY.UH, CITY OF EDMOND IS THE APPLICANT.
UH, THE, UH, CENTRAL EDMOND URBAN DISTRICT CUZ UH, IN THE URBAN PORTION OF, UH, DOWNTOWN ON THE SURROUNDING AREA.
AND IT HAS A SEPARATE SET OF GUIDELINES AND A DIFFERENT OVERSIGHT BOARD.
THE, THE URBAN DISTRICT BOARD, UH, THE BOUNDARY HASN'T BEEN CHANGED SINCE IT WAS FORMED IN 2000.
AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE CREATION OF THINGS LIKE THE TIF DISTRICT, UH, CAUSED THE URBAN BOARD TO CONSIDER EXPANDING THE BOUNDARY OF THE URBAN DISTRICT.
AND THEY LOOKED AT SEVERAL DIFFERENT OFTEN OPTIONS AND THEY RECOMMENDED, INCLUDING THIS AREA SHOWN IN BLUE RIGHT THERE.
SO ON THE WEST IT IS BOUND BY FRETZ.
THAT'S HEARD ON THE SOUTH, THE RAILROAD TRACKS ON THE EAST.
AND THEN THE NORTH, UH, IS THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE DOWNTOWN DETENTION AREA.
THAT'S THE BEST WAY TO DESCRIBE IT.
UM, THE CHANGES ALIGN THE URBAN DISTRICT WITH THE TIF DISTRICT.
UH, THE CENTRAL EDMOND URBAN DISTRICT IS AN OVERLAY AND EXPANDING IT DOES NOT CHANGE THE UNDERLYING ZONING.
SO IF YOU'RE SINGLE FAMILY ZONING IN THERE TODAY, THAT WILL REMAIN UNTIL YOU REQUEST A CHANGE.
IT, UH, THERE IT SIMPLY CHANGES THE GUIDELINES AND WHO REVIEWS THE SITE PLANS.
ULTIMATELY, UH, URBAN BOARD RECOMMEND THIS, RECOMMENDED THIS CHANGE AT THEIR JULY 11TH MEETING AND STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
UH, DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT IN TIME OF CITY STAFF? UH, SEE NONE.
DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS BY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN REGARD TO THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE? JUST A QUESTION.
IS THIS RELATED TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA? WELL, THEY ARE IN BASICALLY THE SAME AREA,
[00:15:01]
BUT THEY ARE DIFFERENT APPLICANTS.I UNDERSTAND, BUT WE'RE DOING THIS TO FACILITATE SOMETHING FOR THE BLACK, WHATEVER IT IS HERE.
BLACK BRICK WEST REZONING? NO, THEY COULD REQUEST THAT REZONING WITH OR WITHOUT THE OVERLAY OVER IT.
IT JUST CHANGES WHERE THEY GO FOR REVIEW.
WELL, I JUST, SO WHAT WAS THE JUST HAPPENED TO HAPPENED AT THE SAME TIME OR WHAT? I'M TRYING TO FIGURE IT OUT.
IT HAS BEEN ON URBAN BOARD'S LIST OF THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR, SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE TO CONSIDER TO EXPAND THEIR DISTRICT.
THE DEVELOPMENT PRESSURES ON THAT SIDE CAUSED THEM TO DO IT.
AND THEN THAT'S JUST NORTH OF THE LARK, IS THAT TRUE? YES-ISH.
IT'S THE PROPERTY THAT BACKS UP RIGHT THERE TO THE RE THE REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER THAT WAS PUT IN THERE.
SO MY, UH, MY OLD, SORRY, UH, LIEUTENANT COLONEL, UH, UH, OREN LEE'S HOUSE IS IN THAT AREA.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WISH TO SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT OR MAKE COMMENTS ON THIS? UH, SEEING NONE.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BY MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION? AND IF NOT, DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION SECOND.
AND THAT PROJECT IS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO AND THAT WILL BE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 14TH.
[F. Case #Z23-00010 Public Hearing and Consideration for a Rezoning from “D-0” Suburban Office and “A” Single-Family to “CBD” Central Business District for Black Brick West Hurd Rezone, located northeast of Fretz and Hurd. (Black Brick Ventures LLC) (Ward 1) ]
TO CASE NUMBER Z 23 DASH 0 0 0 1 0 PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION FOR A REZONING FROM D SUBURBAN OFFICE AND A SINGLE FAMILY TO C CCB D CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT FOR BLACK BRICK WEST HERD REZONE LOCATED NORTH OF FRETZ AND HERD.BLACK BRICK VENTURES LLC IS THE APPLICANT AND IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THEY ARE MR. HENCE.
SO THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR A REZONING FROM DO, UH, WHICH IS COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND A SINGLE FAMILY TO CB D.
UH, THE PROPERTIES ARE LONG HEARD AND ARE IN THE AREA.
WE JUST RECOMMENDED FOR EXPANSION OF THE CBD OR, UH, THE CENTRAL EDMOND URBAN DISTRICT.
UH, CBD ZONING EXISTS TO THE SOUTH.
UH, TO THE NORTH IS THE RETENTION POND AND SOME SINGLE FAMILY ZONING.
UH, TO THE EAST IS SINGLE FAMILY AND A P U D ALLOWING FOR APARTMENTS.
UH, THE EDMOND PLAIN EDMOND PLAN DESIGNATE THIS AREA URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD IN WHICH CBD ZONING IS CONSIDERED APPROPRIATE.
UH, DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CITY'S STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? UH, WOULD THE APPLICANT CARE TO ADD ANYTHING FURTHER OR RELY UPON MR. ANSER? AND DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WISH TO SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? SEEING NONE.
DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IF NOT, DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
UH, THAT PROJECT IS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO.
THAT WILL BE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 14TH.
[G. Case #SP23-00008 Public Hearing and Consideration for a Site Plan for Kelly Hollow Apartments, located northwest of Kelly and W Edmond Rd. (SMC Consulting Engineers) (Ward 4) ]
BRINGS US TO ITEM G.CASE NUMBER SP 23 DASH 0 0 0 0 8 PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION FOR A SITE PLAN FOR KELLY HOLLOW APARTMENTS LOCATED NORTHWEST OF KELLY AND WEST EDMOND ROAD.
S M C CONSULTING ENGINEERS IS THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT.
UH, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE KELLY HOLLOW APARTMENTS, UH, ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KELLY AND MOND ROAD.
UH, THE SITE IS PART OF THE KELLY CROSSING P U D THAT WAS AMENDED AND APPROVED IN 2022.
UH, WILL CORRECT ONE MISTAKE THAT'S IN THE MEMO.
THE MEMO SAID 389 APARTMENTS, BUT THERE'S ACTUALLY ONLY 250 UNITS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT.
UH, THE SITE PLAN CONFORMS TO THE P U D AND SHOWS 390 PARKING SPACES, 265 OF WHICH ARE SURFACED, AND THEN 105, WHICH ARE, UH, GARAGE SPACES.
THERE ARE TWO AND THREE STORY BUILDINGS CAPPED AT A HEIGHT OF 50 AND 39 FEET, UH, RESPECTIVELY.
UH, THERE WILL ALSO BE A CLUBHOUSE AND OTHER AMENITIES FOR THE COMPLEX.
UH, THE BUILDINGS WILL BE FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH BRICK AND BOARD AND BAT AND EXTERIORS AND NEUTRAL COLORS.
UH, THE SITE WILL BE GATED WITH A, AN CONTAIN A SIX TO EIGHT FOOT TALL FENCE AROUND THE DEVELOPMENT.
ACCESS WILL BE FROM A DRIVE ONTO KELLY AND ONE ONTO EDMUND ROAD.
UH, LANDSCAPING IS COMPLIANT AND NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTION OF CITY STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? DO I'M SORRY, RANDY, DID YOU SAY SITE PROOF FENCE FROM THE NORTH SIDE? IS IT SITE PROOF? DO YOU RECALL? I THINK IT SAYS THE PROPERTY IS SHOWN TO HAVE BOTH SIX AND EIGHT FOOT CEDAR OR ALUMINUM FENCING SURROUNDING THE ENTIRE.
AND DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? IF NOT, WOULD THE APPLICANT CARE TO ADD ANYTHING FURTHER?
[00:20:01]
GOOD EVENING.TODD MCKINNIS, UH, FOR THE APPLICANT, THE DEVELOPERS, UH, CAROL WALLEN AND COOPER SCOTT AND RICHARD MCCOWEN ARE HERE.
AND SO IS MUHAMMAD KHAN AND BJ FROM T E C.
UH, SO IT'D BE SILLY NOT TO SAY SOMETHING.
UH, I, WHAT I DO WANNA SAY IS THIS PROJECT CAME ONLINE ABOUT THE EXACT SAME TIME.
WE HAD SOME OTHER MULTIFAMILY THAT GOT A LOT OF ATTENTION IN EDMOND, AND IT'S UN IT'S JUST UNKIND THAT THOSE DIDN'T WORK.
THIS IS GONNA BE A GREAT PROJECT AND KUDOS TO THE DEVELOPER BECAUSE HE WAS INVOLVED IN ONE OF THOSE PROJECTS AND GOT HIS LAND TAKEN OUT FROM UNDERNEATH HIM.
AND SO THIS PROJECT HAS GONE THROUGH WITH CITY STAFF AND I JUST WANTED TO TAKE A MINUTE AND TELL STEVE LAWRENCE, WE APPRECIATE HIS TIME AND HIS STAFF'S TIME BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME UNIQUE COMPLEXITIES WITH THE INTERSECTION OF SECOND KELLY.
IT'S A VERY BUSY INTERSECTION AND, UH, I REPRESENTED THIS DEVELOPMENT, UH, TO GET THE ZONING CHANGE IN 2022.
I'M JUST SO EXCITED TO SEE THIS COME TO FRUITION.
AND SO, UH, WE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF HEAVY LIFTING TO GO, BUT, UH, THIS CLEARS A LOT OF THE HURDLES FOR US TO GET IT DONE AND THERE'LL BE SOME IMPROVEMENTS, MOST LIKELY OFFSITE RELATED TO TRAFFIC AND OTHER THINGS, BUT WE'RE GONNA WORK WITH STAFF ON THAT AND WE JUST APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO GET TO THIS POINT.
SO IT'S REALLY MORE OF A COMMERCIAL THAN A COMMENT, BUT THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I AM ON THIS THING.
SO
WELL, I, WELL, NOW THAT YOU OPENED THE DOOR, I'M GONNA SAY THIS, UH, WHEN WE DID THE ZONING IN 2021 OR 2020 STARTED, UH, THERE WASN'T A SINGLE COMMENT MADE AT ANY OF OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS EXCEPT ONE LADY WHO WAS UPSET THAT THERE'S A POTHOLE IN THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS PARKING LOT, A HALF MILE UP THE ROAD.
UH, AND THIS PROJECT HAS MOVED THROUGH ABOUT AS EFFICIENTLY AS WE CAN.
UH, UNFORTUNATELY INTEREST RATES HAVE DOUBLED SINCE THEN, BUT MY GUYS AND GIRLS ARE COMMITTED TO SEEING THIS COME TO FRUITION AND I THINK IT'S GONNA BE A GREAT ADDITION TO THIS SIDE OF EDMUND TO A SITE THAT HAD DEVELOPED OUT ON THE FRONT, BUT WAS KIND OF LANGUISHING HERE IN THE BACK.
SO, UH, THESE GUYS ARE WONDERFUL DEVELOPERS AND I'M GLAD THEY DECIDED TO STICK AROUND EDMUND AND BRING THIS PROJECT TO REALITY.
UH, DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK EITHER FOR AGAINST US? YES, MA'AM.
IF YOU'LL PLEASE COME FORWARD, IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND PROVIDE US WITH YOUR ADDRESS.
UM, MY QUESTION, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SITE PLAN, I'M JUST CURIOUS AS TO THE SIZE OF THE UNITS.
UM, AND, UM, PROBABLY AND PROBABLY THE RENTS.
WHAT'S GONNA BE RENT PROB, YOU KNOW, UH, WE WILL HAVE, UH, WE'LL GET, YEAH, WE'LL GET THE, UH, PEOPLE TO GO AHEAD AND ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS HERE IN A MINUTE.
WE'LL SEE IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
AND WAS THAT YOUR ONLY QUESTION? YEAH, THAT'S IT.
AND, UH, DO WE HAVE ANY, ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK EITHER FOR, AGAINST THIS AS A MEMBER OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC? YES, SIR.
WAITING IF YOU WAIT AND WE'LL QUESTION, OTHERWISE YOU MIGHT BE BOUNCING UP AND DOWN.
UM, I JUST WANT TO, UH, SAY THAT THIS IS A BEAUTIFUL LOOKING PROJECT DESPERATELY NEEDED.
AND EDMOND, IF ANYBODY'S BEEN, UH, AWARE OF THE HOUSING STUDY THAT WAS JUST DONE THAT SAYS WE NEED 9,000 UNITS OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS.
UM, REALLY HIGH QUALITY MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS LIKE THIS THAT HAVE GREAT DEVELOPERS BEHIND THEM ARE CRITICAL TO, UH, TO US GETTING THERE.
SO ESPECIALLY IN THE SORT OF PERIMETER OF THE DOWNTOWN CORE, UM, A LOT OF, UH, POSITIVE SUPPORT COMING FROM ME AND MY BUSINESS PARTNER AND, UH, AND ALL OF US.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WISH TO SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? SEE NONE.
IF THE DEVELOPER WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE REGARDING THE SIZE OF THE APARTMENTS AND WHAT THE RENT IS, YOU CERTAINLY MAY, BUT YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO U UNDERSTOOD.
UH, RICHARD MCCOWEN, UH, SS L M DEVELOPMENT, UH, 65 0 1 NORTH CLASSON DRIVE OR OFFICE ADDRESS.
UM, SO OUR, UH, ONE BEDROOM, UH, ONE BEDROOM APARTMENTS, AND THIS IS HALF OF THE APARTMENTS ARE ONE BEDROOM AND HALF OF THEM ARE TWO BEDROOM.
THEY'RE GONNA BE A RANGE IN SIZE FROM KINDA 700 AND TO 785 SQUARE FEET.
WE HAVE A FEW OF THE CARRIAGE HOUSES ALONG THE NORTH SIDE THAT ARE A LITTLE BIT LARGER THAN THAT.
AND THEN OUR TWO BEDROOMS ARE IN THE, YOU KNOW, THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT PLUS, UH, SIZE.
AND THEN THE RENTAL RANGE IS GONNA BE ON THE ONE BEDS IN THAT $1,295 A MONTH.
AND THEN THE TWO BEDS, IT'LL BE 1600 A MONTH AND UP.
UM, WE'VE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN, TRYING TO KEEP PRICES AS REASONABLE AS POSSIBLE, BUT, UM, LIKE TODD MENTIONED, INTEREST RATES ARE CONTINUING TO CLIMB, BUT, UM, WE, WE, WE THINK IT'LL BE A, A REALLY GOOD FIT, UM, CLASS A, UH,
[00:25:01]
MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITY AND, UH, WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THE, UM, THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENT TO THIS, THAT, THAT'S, YOU KNOW, I INVITE YOU ALL OUT TO COME TAKE A LOOK WHEN WE GET IT FINISHED AND GRAND OPENING.IT'S GOT A LOT OF NEAT FEATURES AND LOVE TO GIVE YOU A TOUR WHEN, WHEN WE GET IT COMPLETED.
DO UH, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF ANYONE OR COMMENTS AT THIS POINT IN TIME? IF NOT, DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
AND THAT ITEM IS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO AND IT IS ACTUALLY FINISHED HERE TONIGHT.
[H. Case #PR23-00005 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Preliminary Plat for Woodland Park V to be located on the east side of Douglas, south of Coffee Creek Road. (Ward 2) ]
US TO ITEM H, CASE NUMBER PR 23 DASH 0 0 0 0 5 PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WOODLAND PARK.FIVE TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DOUGLAS, SOUTH OF COFFEE CREEK ROAD.
OKAY, SO THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT.
UH, IT CONTAINS 45.4 ACRES AND THIS IS PART OF THE WOODLAND PARK, UH, DEVELOPMENT THAT'S GOVERNED BY THAT P U D.
THIS IS WOODLAND PARK, PHASE FIVE.
THIS PHASE HAS 76 LOTS RANGING, RANGING FROM 9,100 SQUARE FEET, UH, TO 21,000 SQUARE FEET.
UH, THE SMALLER LOTS ARE ON THE WEST SIDE, LARGER LOTS ON THE EAST.
UH, THE ACCESS IS THROUGH THE EXISTING STREETS IN THE WOODLAND PARK DEVELOPMENT.
UH, THE UTILITIES ARE EXISTING AND THE DRAINAGE WAS DESIGNED WITH THE OTHER, UH, PHASES.
UH, THE LANDSCAPING IS COMPLIANT.
THE TREE PRESERVATION IS CONTAINED IN ONE AREA BY THE P U D, BUT SPREAD ACROSS, UH, THE ALLOWANCE IS SPREAD ACROSS ALL THE DIFFERENT PHASES.
UH, NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF, UH, THE COMMISSION THAT HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AS STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? SEEING NONE, WOULD THE APPLICANT CARE TO ADD ANYTHING OR RELY UPON THE WONDERFUL COMMENTS OF THE CITY STAFF? WERE IN FACT, WONDERFUL.
NOTHING TO ADD, NOTHING TO ADD.
UH, DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? SEEING NONE.
DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS BY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION AT THIS POINT IN TIME AND SCENE? NONE.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
AND THAT PROJECT IS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO.
[I. Case #SP22-00046 Public Hearing and Consideration of a Site Plan application for The Pure at Kelley Pointe, located on the west side of Kelley Pointe Parkway, north of 33rd Street. (ERC Building Company) (Ward 3) ]
I, CASE NUMBER SP 22 DASH 0 0 0 4 6 PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE PURE AT KELLY POINT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF KELLY POINT PARKWAY, NORTH OF 33RD STREET.E R C BUILDING COMPANY IS THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT.
MR. S OKAY, YOU MAY RECALL THIS.
THIS IS A RECENTLY APPROVED P U D THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR THESE, UH, APARTMENTS AT THIS SITE.
THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN.
UH, IT'S LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF KELLY POINT.
UH, THE PLAN INCLUDES 228 UNITS.
UH, THE SITE PLAN DOES CONFORM TO THAT P U D.
IT ALSO SHOWS 339 PARKING SPACES, INCLUDING 12 GARAGE SPACES.
UH, THE BUILDINGS ARE LIMITED TO 42 FEET IN HEIGHT, AND THEY'RE A MIX OF BRICK AND CEMENT BOARD WITH ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES ON THE ROOF.
UH, THE SITE DOES SHOW A LANDSCAPE BERM ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY WITH THE TREE PRESERVATION IN THAT AREA AS WELL TO BUFFER THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH.
UH, THE COMPLEX IS ACCESSED OFF KELLY POINT WITH THE SECONDARY ACCESS BEING SHOWN TO THE SOUTH, WHICH WILL REQUIRE CROSS ACCESS AGREEMENT FROM THAT PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE.
UH, THE LANDSCAPING IS COMPLIANT AND NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CITY'S STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? WOULD THE APPLICANT CARE TO ADD ANYTHING AT THIS POINT IN TIME? DO WE HAVE MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? MR. O'NEILL, WERE THERE ANY, MR. COMMISSIONER, WERE THERE ANY, UH, CHANGES IN THIS SITE PLAN FROM, UH, THE ORIGINALS THAT WERE PROPOSED TO THE NEIGHBORS, UH, YEARS, UH, YEAR AND A HALF AGO OR WHATEVER? GO AHEAD.
WE WILL, WE WILL GET THAT ADDRESSED FOR YOU.
AND DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BY ANYONE? I WAS GONNA SAY, I DON'T THINK IT'S BEEN QUITE A YEAR AND A HALF, BUT IF YOU COULD GO AHEAD AND IT FELT LIKE IT.
NO, UH, MARK AU JOHNSON ASSOCIATES ADDRESS IS WHEN HE SHARED AN AVENUE.
UH, SO THERE HAVE BEEN, WHAT I WOULD SAY ARE MINOR TWEAKS TO THE SITE PLAN.
THAT'S ACTUALLY, I BELIEVE THE, UH, OLD LANDSCAPE PLAN.
I, I THINK THERE'S A NEW ONE THAT, UH, REFLECTS THE BERMS, UH,
[00:30:01]
THAT WERE PUT IN.BUT REALLY THE CHANGES IN THE SITE PLAN CAME MORE TO, UH, TREE PRESERVATION AREAS, THE BERMS AND THE LANDSCAPING.
FOR THE MOST PART, THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE SITE PLAN HAVE REMAINED THE SAME.
UH, IT'S DESIGNED WITH A CENTER COURTYARD AND POOL.
UM, THE OTHER THING THAT, UH, YOU KIND OF SEE ON THIS DRAWING ON THE, THE SOUTHERN PIECE, WE HAVE A CONNECTION THAT FIRE REQUIRED TO THE PARKING LOT, UH, OFFICE BUILDING TO THE SOUTH FOR CIRCULATION.
UH, BUT OTHER THAN THAT, IT REMAINS ALMOST IDENTICAL TO THE LAST SITE PLAN THAT THE RESIDENCE WOULD'VE SEEN BACK IN MARCH, I BELIEVE.
UM, DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AT THIS POINT IN TIME? IF NOT, DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
UH, THAT IS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO, AND THAT IS FINISHED HERE TONIGHT AS
[6. New Business - (In accordance with the Open Meeting Act, new business is defined as any matter not known about or which could not have been reasonably foreseen prior to the time of posting of the agenda.)]
WELL.THAT BRINGS US TO NEW BUSINESS AND I SEE NONE.
DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT? OKAY.
ONE OF THE REASONS I CAME DOWN HERE WAS TO OFFER, UH, OR ASK A QUESTION.
WE'RE WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF FINALIZING OUR HOUSING ASSESSMENT FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
HAS, HAS THE PLANNING COMMISSION BEEN INVOLVED IN THIS EX HAVE YOU HAD ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS BY YOURSELF OF, OF REVIEWING THE DOCUMENT? IS IT SCHEDULED? UH, I KNOW WE HAVE BEEN INVITED TO HAVE OPPORTUNITY TO BASICALLY ATTEND THE MEETINGS THAT ARE THERE, BUT AS A, BUT AS A BODY, YOU HAVE NOT PARTICIPATED IN THE REVIEW OR ALLOWED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
TYPICALLY, I TYPICALLY, THEY RUN THESE THINGS THROUGH VARIOUS BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS THAT ARE RELATED TO IT.
AND I THOUGHT MAYBE IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO HAVE YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE YOUR INPUT ON THE FINAL REPORT.
RANDY, I WAS, THIS, THIS IS THE FIRST HOUSING STUDY WE'VE EVER DONE AS A CITY, SO THERE IS NO TYPICAL FOR IT, ACTUALLY.
SO WE'RE FINDING OUT A NEW WAY.
THERE WERE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS INVOLVED THROUGHOUT, AND THERE WAS A JOINT WORKSHOP HELD BETWEEN THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL.
UH, AS IT GOES THROUGH APPROVAL, IF CITY MANAGER WANTS TO GO TO, WE HAVE FILE REPORT NOW.
WE DO NOT HAVE A FINAL REPORT YET.
THE DRAFT IS STILL SITTING ON MY DESK AND IT HASN'T BEEN GIVEN BACK TO THE CONSULTANTS TO MAKE THE EDITS, BUT IT'S JUST A THOUGHT THAT THIS BOARD SINCE WE'RE INVOLVED, WELL, WE'LL TAKE THAT UNDER CONSIDERATION, SEE IF NEEDS TO COME.
UM, ANY OTHER NEW BUSINESS? SEE NONE.
DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
ALL IN FAVOR? SAY WELL, DO WE HAVE A SECOND? NO SECOND.