[00:00:05]
[1. Call to Order.]
TIME WE WILL CALL TO ORDER THE TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3RD, 2023 MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.[2. Consideration of Approval of Meeting Minutes: 9/19/2023]
FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES FROM THE SEPTEMBER 19TH, 2023 MEETING.HAVE ALL MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE AND DO WE HAVE ANY CHANGES OR AMENDMENTS THAT NEED TO BE MADE TO THE MINUTES? NO, SIR.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES? I MOVE TO APPROVE.
I GUESS YOU COULD VOTE IF YOU'RE NOT IN FAVOR TOO.
[3. Continuance Docket: Items on the continuance docket will be voted on as a group, unless members of the commission or the public request individual action on an item.]
THAT BRINGS US TO OUR CONTINUANCE DOCKET AND WE HAVE TWO ITEMS ON THE CONTINUANCE DOCKET, UH, PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF THE URBAN RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY, WHICH WILL BE APPLIED TO THREE DIFFERENT AREAS DOWNTOWN.THAT IS GOING TO BE CONTINUED TENTATIVELY TO THE OCTOBER 17TH, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND CASE NUMBER S P 22 DASH 0 0 0 4 9 PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION FOR A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR TAKE FIVE OIL CHANGE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SANTA FE.
THAT ITEM WILL BE CONTINUED AS WELL TO THE OCTOBER 17TH, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON BOTH OF THOSE ITEMS TO CONTINUE? SECOND, UH, BY VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO.
THOSE ITEMS ARE CONTINUED TO THE OCTOBER 17TH, 2023 MEETING,
[4. Public Hearing - Consent Docket: Items on the consent docket are recommended for approval by the Staff and will be voted on as a group, unless members of the commission or the public request individual action on an item.]
UH, PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT DOCKET.WE HAVE ONE ITEM, WHICH IS CASE NUMBER DD 23 DASH 0 0 0 1 0 CONSIDERATION FOR A DEEDED CERTIFICATION FOR CASSIAN LAKES TRACK.
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EAST 33RD STREET, EAST POST ROAD, CASSIAN LAKES.
L L C IS THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT.
UM, DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF THE STAFF OR ANY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT NEED TO HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT THIS ITEM OR CAN WE PROCEED ON CONSENT DOCKET? NOTHING TO ADD.
SEEING NONE, DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM FOUR A? I DO APPROVE.
THAT ITEM IS APPROVED BY VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO.
[A. Case #SP23-00014 Public Hearing and Consideration for a Site Plan application and Case #U23-00004 Specific Use Permit for City of Edmond Fire Station 6, located on the east side of Kelly Avenue, south of Kelly Lakes Pass. (City of Edmond) (Ward 4)]
TO OUR PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION.DOCKET FIRST ITEM IS CASE NUMBER SS SP 23 DASH 0 0 0 1 4 PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION FOR A SITE PLAN APPLICATION AND CASE U 23 DASH 0 0 0 0 4 SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE CITY OF EDMOND FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF KELLY AVENUE SOUTH OF KELLY LAKES PASS.
UH, CITY OF EDMOND IS THE APPLICANT AND THEY ARE REPRESENTED HERE TONIGHT.
MR. S NOT HARD TO FIGURE OUT WHICH ONE IS IT.
UM, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR A NEW FIRE STATION.
IT'S FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX AND IT'LL BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF KELLY AVENUE AND KELLY LAKES PASS.
UH, THE SITE IS ZONED AS A P U D ALLOWING FOR OFFICE COMMERCIAL USES AND REQUIRES A USE PERMIT FOR GOVERNMENT FACILITIES.
SO THAT IS A PART OF THIS APPLICATION AS WELL.
UH, THE SITE PLAN SHOWS ONE BUILDING THAT IS 29 FEET TALL AT ITS TALLEST POINT.
UH, THE BUILDING WILL BE PREDOMINANTLY BRICK AND STONE WITH METAL ACCENTS.
UH, THE SITE PLAN ALSO SHOWS 15 PARKING SPACES.
UH, THE DRIVE SERVING THE STATION REQUIRE A VARIANCE, UH, IN ORDER TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
UH, IT'S THE DRIVE SOUTH OF KELLY LAKE PASS ON KELLY IS ONLY 189 FEET SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 325 FEET AND THE DRIVE IS, UH, 52 FEET WIDE.
INSTEAD OF THE MAXIMUM 35 FEET ALLOWED BY CODE, UH, STAFF DOES SUPPORT BOTH THOSE VARIANCES.
OTHER THAN THOSE REQUESTED VARIANCES, UH, THE LANDSCAPING, SETBACKS, LIGHTING, AND OTHER SITE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
DO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? WOULD THE APPLICANT CARE TO ADD ANYTHING FURTHER OR ARE YOU GOING TO RELY UPON THE WONDERFUL STATEMENTS OF MR. S? LOOKS LIKE WE'RE RELYING.
DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? SEEING NONE.
DO I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION AT THIS POINT IN TIME? IF NOT, DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
AND THAT ITEM IS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO.
IT'LL BE FOR CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 23RD.
[B. Case #Z23-00017 Public Hearing and Consideration for a Rezoning from “G-A” General Agricultural to “A” Single Family Dwelling District for the property located north of Sorghum Mill, west of Broadway. (Stephen Grimes) (Ward 4)]
UH, BRINGS THIS TO CASE NUMBER Z 23 DASH 0 0 0 1 7 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR REZONING FROM GENERAL AGRICULTURAL TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF SORGHUM MILL, WEST OF BROADWAY.[00:05:01]
IS THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT APPEARS TO BE PRESENT.UH, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE A PORTION OF, UH, THE OAK TREE SITE FROM GA OR GENERAL AG TO A SINGLE FAMILY.
UH, THE SITE, WHICH IS 2.3 ACRES, UH, IS ON THE FAR EASTERN EDGE OF OAK TREE ADJACENT TO THE B N S F RAILROAD, UH, RIGHT OF WAY AND IN BETWEEN HOLES THREE AND 11 ON THE EAST COURSE.
UH, THE PROPERTY IS NOT A PART OF THE COURSE AND IS PRIVATELY OWNED.
UH, AND THE PROPERTY IS, UH, ACCESSED VIA CARMEL VALLEY PLACE, WHICH IS A PRIVATE STREET.
THE RE ZONING WILL ALLOW THE CREATION OF A FEW LOTS THAT WOULD BE ACCESSED FROM THAT STREET, AND IN FACT, A PRELIMINARY PLATT IS UNDER REVIEW AT THIS TIME.
UH, THE COMP PLAN DESIGNATES THE, UH, AREAS SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD TWO, WHICH ARE AREAS THAT ARE GENERALLY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
UH, THE, A SINGLE FAMILY ZONING, ALBEIT SHOWN IN YELLOW IN THE PLAN, UH, WOULD BE APPROPRIATE IN THIS AREA GIVEN THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND THE GOLF GOLF COURSE AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
DO ANY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTION OF CITY STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? I DO HAVE A QUESTION.
SO, SO THIS IS PRIVATELY OWNED? YES.
IT'S NOT A PRIVATELY BY OAKTREE.
SO, AND NOT THAT IT MATTERS FOR US, BUT I'M JUST CURIOUS ON ACCESS OF USING A PRIVATE DRIVE TO GET TO THIS PRIVATE AREA THROUGH A PRIVATE DRIVE.
UM, THAT'S GONNA BE A PART OF THE PLAT WHEN THAT COMES.
PART OF THE DETAILS THEY'LL HAVE TO SHOW ON THE PLATT IS THAT THEY HAVE ACCESS TO THAT PRIVATE STREET.
I WOULD IMAGINE THAT, UH, OAK TREE WILL ALSO WANT THEM TO BE A PART OF THE CC AND R SO THEY HAVE THE SAME RESTRICTIONS AND ARE PAYING THE SAME KIND OF FEES.
DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE CITY STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? WOULD THE APPLICANT CARE TO ADD ANYTHING? UH, DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION AT THIS POINT IN TIME? IF NOT, DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM FIVE B? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
UH, THAT ITEM IS APPROVED BY VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO.
THAT WILL GO BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 23RD.
[C. Approval of the schedule for Planning Commission Meetings for Calendar Year 2024.]
THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM FIVE C, WHICH IS APPROVAL OF THE SCHEDULE FOR THE PLANNING PENSION MEETING FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2024.I BELIEVE THAT'S THE LAST PAGE OF OUR AGENDA.
HAS EVERYONE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THIS PARTICULAR ITEM? DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? AND IF NOT, DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM? MOTION TO APPROVE.
AND THE CALENDAR IS APPROVED BY VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO.
DO WE HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS AT THIS POINT IN TIME TO SEE NONE? DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT? MAKE A MOTION.
AND WE ARE ADJOURNED AT 5 37 AND A HALF.