[00:00:02]
UH, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE'LL CALL TO ORDER THE TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6TH, 2024,
[1. Call to Order.]
MEETING AT THE[2. Consideration of Approval of Meeting Minutes: 1/16/2024]
PLANNING COMMISSION.UH, THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CONSIDERATION, APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.
HAS EVERYONE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THEM AND ARE THERE ANY CHANGES, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, MOVE TO APPROVE.
SECOND, SECOND, AND THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO.
[3. Public Hearing - Consent Docket: Items on the consent docket are recommended for approval by the Staff and will be voted on as a group, unless members of the commission or the public request individual action on an item.]
UH, THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ON OUR CONSENT DOCKET.UH, THE CONSENT DOCKET BASICALLY, UH, DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY PUBLIC HEARING UNLESS SOMEONE WISHES TO HAVE A POLL BASED UPON THE CROWD, I ASSUME THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE THE CASE.
THE ITEM IS CASE NUMBER DD 23 DASH 0 0 0 1 4 CONSIDERATION OF A DEED CERTIFICATION FOR 54 20 INDIAN HILL ROAD.
NATHAN VAUGHN IS THE APPLICANT AND I ASSUME EVERYONE HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THAT AND IF SO, AND WE HAVE NO QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
UH, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT ITEM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION SECOND.
AND THAT ITEM IS APPROVED BY VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO.
[A. Case #PR23-00020 Public Hearing and Consideration for a Re-plat of Stone Hill Cottages at Iron Horse Ranch Final Plat, located on the southeast corner of Coffee Creek and Coltrane. (Crafton Tull) (Ward 2)]
THE AGENDA IS ON OUR DISCUSSION DOCKET IS CASE NUMBER PR 23 DASH 20 PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION FOR A RE PLAT OF STONEHILL COTTAGES AND IRON HORSE RANCH.UH, FINAL PLAT LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COFFEE CREEK AND COAL TRAIN IN THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT.
UH, MR. BRIAN, IF YOU'LL PLEASE PRESENT THIS ITEM.
UM, YOU CAN SEE THE, UH, THE PLATTED AREA ALLIED HERE ON THE SCREEN AND THE, UH, THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION HIGHLIGHTED IN THE, IN THE BOLD YELLOW LINES THERE WITH THOSE LOTS.
UM, THE PROPOSED RE PLAT REMOVES THE TWO COMMON AREAS, COMMON AREAS B AND C, AND ALLOCATES THOSE TWO AREAS TO THE ADJACENT SIX LOTS.
SO YOU CAN SEE THAT MODIFICATION HERE ON THE SCREEN.
THIS REQUEST DOES NOT CHANGE THE NUMBER OF DEVELOPABLE.
HAPPY TO TRY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
UH, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CITY STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME? WAS THERE ANYTHING IN THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL THAT WE PUT THAT IN THERE FOR A PURPOSE OR IT WAS THERE THAT WE NEED TO BE AWARE OF? I DON'T, I DON'T BELIEVE SO.
I'M NOT A HUNDRED PERCENT SURE WHAT THAT PURPOSE OF THOSE TWO COMMON AREAS WERE.
I MIGHT INVITE THE APPLICANT TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION FOR THE RECORD.
KENDALL DILL CRAFT AND TOLL REFERENCE APPLICANT AND NO, I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY CODE REQUIREMENT.
I DON'T, I THINK IT WAS FOR WHATEVER REASON AND I WASN'T INVOLVED WHEN THEY DID THE FINAL PLAT, BUT I THINK THEY JUST THOUGHT, HEY, IT'S THE MIDDLE OF THE BLOCK, LET'S BREAK IT A LITTLE BIT.
UM, BUT REALLY THEY'RE NOT THAT LONG OF BLOCKS ANYWAYS.
AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THE COMMON AREA, ONE OF THEM'S LIKE JUST A 10TH OF AN ACRE.
SO I THINK AFTER THE FACT THEY LOOKED AT IT AND THEY'RE LIKE, HEY, WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO WITH THESE COMMON AREAS? AND THE LOGICAL THING WOULD BE JUST TO SPLIT THEM DOWN THE MIDDLE AND ADD 'EM TO EACH LOT.
SO IT'S PRETTY SIMPLE TO, OKAY.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION AT THIS POINT IN TIME? ANYONE FROM THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WANTS TO SPEAK EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? AND I'M ASSUMING THE APPLICANT IS GOING TO RELY UPON THE STATEMENTS OF STAFF AT THIS POINT IN TIME BASED UPON YOUR COMMENTS THAT YOU'VE ALREADY MADE AS WELL? YES.
AND DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THIS PROJECT? WE DO APPROVE.
SECOND, UH, THE PROJECT IS, OR THE, UH, ITEM IS APPROVED BY VOTE FIVE TO ZERO.
THAT WILL BE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON, UH, FEBRUARY 26TH.
UH, DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR, WELL, DO WE HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS? AND I DON'T BELIEVE WE DO.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT? SO SECOND.
OPPOSED? WE ARE ADJOURNED AT 5 34.