[00:00:02]
OUR EDMOND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING TODAY
[1. Call to Order of the Edmond City Council Meeting.]
ON JANUARY 27TH, 2025.UH, BEFORE WE GET TO THE PRESENTATIONS, I DO WANNA MAKE THE ONE PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT ITEM 10 A, IF YOU'RE HERE FOR ITEM 10 A AT ITEM WILL BE CONTINUED, UH, WHEN WE GET TO IT.
UH, SO I JUST DIDN'T WANT ANYONE SITTING HERE WAITING FOR 10 A TO COME AROUND.
AND, UH, NOW THAT, SO NOW IS ANOTHER TIME OF MY, UM, TIME IN THE SEAT IS TO
[A. Recognition of Janet Yowell for Over 35 Years of Service to the City of Edmond.]
DO A PRESENTATION AND TO RECOGNIZE SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN WITH US FOR A COUPLE OF DAYS.AND I UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S A NECESSARY EVIL IN LIFE, BUT SOMETIMES WE'VE JUST GOTTA SAY IT'S TIME TO GO HOME AND WATCH THE BUTTERFLIES.
AND THAT'S WHAT JANET WANTS TO DO.
AND I JUST, WHEN THE ANNOUNCEMENT CAME OUT THAT YOU SAID THAT YOUR FUNNY, I'M LIKE, I, AS I SAID, I FULLY UNDERSTAND, BUT I JUST WANTED TO BRING YOU IN FRONT OF THE COUNCIL AND SAY THANK YOU FOR ALL THE THINGS THAT YOU'VE DONE FOR US, FOR THE CITY, UH, YOUR TIME.
AND ALSO, I DON'T HAVE A CERTIFICATE FOR YOUR, FOR YOUR HUSBAND, BUT GUESS WHAT, DO YOU THINK HE DESERVES ONE? YEAH.
BECAUSE I KNOW WHAT MY WIFE HAS TO DEAL WITH.
THAT YOU SPENT TIME AWAY FROM HIM TO BE WITH US.
AND SO THAT IS A BIG SACRIFICE.
AND SO, YES, I'LL JUST SAY THANK YOU, BUT I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU AND JUST HAD A FEW THINGS.
I HAD THIS LITTLE CERTIFICATE HERE FOR YOU.
I WAS JUST SAYING, JANET, WE WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS OUR SINCERE THANKS AND GRATITUDE FOR YOUR 35 YEARS OF OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF EDMOND.
YOUR EXCELLENCE AND COMMITMENT ARE TRULY WORTHY OF RECOGNITION, AND WE WISH YOU'RE THE BEST OF LUCK IN YOUR FUTURE ENDEAVORS GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE CITY OF EDMOND ON THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025.
BUT ALSO, WE HAD THIS, IT HAD THIS COIN HERE, AND THIS IS, SOME PEOPLE CALL IT THE MAYORS CHALLENGE COIN.
SOME PEOPLE JUST CALL IT A COIN, BUT IT HAS TWO SIGNIFICANT EVENTS ON IT.
ON ONE SIDE, IN 2026, WE'RE GONNA CELEBRATE THE CENTENNIAL OF ROUTE 66.
AND THEN JUST A FEW YEARS AGO, WE CELEBRATED THE 50 YEARS OF LIBERTY FEST, AND YOU WERE A PART OF ALL OF THESE ACTIONS AND, AND THE THINGS THAT HAVE HAPPENED HERE.
AND I JUST WANTED YOU TO HAVE THIS COIN HERE FOR YOUR MOMENTUM FROM US.
AND JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU.
I DIDN'T KNOW IF ANYONE ELSE ON THE COUNCIL WANTED TO SAY ANYTHING.
'CAUSE I WAS GONNA OPEN THE FLOOR BEFORE WE GAVE YOU THE FLOOR.
I'VE HAD THE PLEASURE OF SERVING ON THE EDMOND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WITH JANET OVER THE LAST THREE AND THREE QUARTERS YEARS.
AND SO I'D JUST LIKE TO SAY A SPECIFIC THANK YOU AND APPRECIATION FOR NOT JUST THAT TIME, BUT 35 YEARS OF SERVING THE CITY.
AND I GOT THE PLEASURE TO MEET JANET AS A FRIEND BEFORE I STARTED WORKING WITH HER.
THIS WOMAN HAS NOT GIVEN, NOT ONLY GIVEN TO THE CITY OF EDMOND AND ALL OF THE RESIDENTS, BUT SHE IS A HEART OF GOLD AND SHE'S AN AMAZING WOMAN.
AND YOU JUST HAVE FUN AND WHATEVER YOU DO EVERY SINGLE DAY FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE, AND ENJOY IT AND ENJOY THOSE BABIES AND YOU'LL BE MISSED.
BUT I KNOW WE WILL SEE YOU AROUND.
JANET, YOU'RE MY FRIEND AND I'M VERY HAPPY FOR YOU.
UM, I THANK YOU FOR THE EXAMPLE THAT YOU'VE GIVEN AND SACRIFICING AND, UM, SERVING VERY WELL.
AND I JUST WISH YOU, UM, WONDERFUL TIMES WITH YOUR FAMILY AND ENJOYING, UM, ENJOYING RETIREMENT.
WELL, I JUST WANNA SAY THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH.
[00:05:01]
WE GO BACK A NUMBER OF YEARS AS WELL AS A LOT OF US ON, ON THIS COUNCIL.UM, IT'S BEEN AN HONOR TO PLAY A PART IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS COMMUNITY, UM, FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS.
AND I WANT TO THANK THIS COUNCIL AS WELL AS I NEED TO THANK MANY PREVIOUS COUNCILS FOR YOUR SUPPORT OF THE EEDA OVER THE YEARS AND OF ME, AND ALSO FOR GIVING ME, UM, A VAST ARRAY OF TRUSTEES THAT HAVE WORKED ALONGSIDE ME THAT HAVE HAD JUST ALL THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF BUSINESS EXPERTISE THAT HAVE, THAT HAVE HELPED US.
UH, DONNA YOUNG IS HERE FROM MY OFFICE.
AND I THINK THERE ARE A LOT OF EXCITING OPPORTUNITIES FOR EDMOND IN THE FUTURE.
AND I LOOK FORWARD TO WATCHING THOSE FROM THE SIDELINES.
UM, I, I HAVE A COUPLE OF DAUGHTERS WATCHING ON, UH, CAMERA AND SO I WILL BE SPENDING TIME WITH BABIES AND MY HUSBAND
NO, BUT THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH.
AND I'LL WATCHING FROM THE SIDELINES.
NEXT ORDER, BUSINESS APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS THAT WE HAVE THE WARD FOR APPOINTMENT
[3. Appointments and Reappointments:]
OF JAMES BOGGS TO THE CITIZENS TIP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE TO REPLACE JARED FRAZIER.THERE'S NO MAX TERM ON THIS COMMITTEE.
COUNSEL, THAT IS THE ONLY APPOINTMENT WE HAVE AT FOR THIS MEETING.
I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT.
MR. MAYOR, I'LL SECOND THAT APPOINTMENT.
UH, ITEM FOUR IS THE RECESS OF THE EDMOND CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND CALL TO ORDER OF THE,
[4. Recess of the Edmond City Council Meeting and Call to Order of the Edmond Public Works Authority Meeting.]
UH, EDMOND PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING.WE'RE NOW IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING.
THE FIRST ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER FIVE, WHICH IS THE GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS. THERE ARE TWO ITEMS THERE.
[5. Public Works Authority General Consent Items: Items listed under General Consent are usually approved as a group with the proper motion from a member of the Public Works Authority. Members of the Public Works Authority may pull any item under General Consent for separate discussion and/or action.]
UH, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, COUNSEL, ON THOSE TWO ITEMS? NO, SIR.WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO? I MOVE TO APPROVE ITEMS FIVE A AND B.
SECOND AND A SECOND, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
THOSE GENERAL, THOSE PUBLIC WORKS.
GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS, UH, TWO ITEMS PASSED.
WE DO NOT HAVE ANY PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY DISCUSSION, CONSIDERATION ITEMS. UH, SO AS WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, WE NEED TO ADJOURN FOR THE, UH, THE EVAN PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING
[7. Adjournment of the Edmond Public Works Authority Meeting and Reconvene the Edmond City Council Meeting.]
AND RECONVENE THE EVAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING.SECOND, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
WE'RE NOW BACK IN THE GENERAL IN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
ITEM NUMBER EIGHT IS THE CITY COUNCIL GENERAL CASSETTE ITEM.
THERE ARE 14 ITEMS THERE, COUNCIL.
[8. City Council General Consent Items: Items listed under General Consent are usually approved as a group with the proper motion from a member of the Council. Members of the Council may pull any item under General Consent for separate discussion and/or action.]
UH, WE DO HAVE TWO ITEMS THAT NEED RESOLUTION NUMBERS, ITEM H AND I.SO ITEM H IS CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NUMBER FIVE DASH 25, 5 DASH 25 AND I IS CONSIDERATION APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NUMBER SIX DASH 25 6 DASH 25.
ARE THERE GONNA BE ANY PRESENTATIONS? OKAY.
THERE ARE NO PRESENTATIONS IN THESE, UH, 14 CONSENT ITEMS. COUNSEL, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO ON THESE? ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS ON THE, ON THESE 14 GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS? NO, SIR.
I MOVE TO APPROVE THE GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS. WE HAVE A MOTION.
UH, CITY COUNCIL GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS HAVE BEEN PASSED.
NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER NINE, AS THE CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION ITEMS.
[B. Discussion and Presentation of the Long Range Transit Plan (LRTP) Currently Under Development by the Association of Central Oklahoma Governments (ACOG) for the ACOG Transportation Management Area. (Citywide)]
WE HAVE ITEM NINE B, WHICH IS DISCUSSION AND PRESENTATION OF THE LONG RANGE.UH, TRANSIT PLAN, LRTP, CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT BY THE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL
[00:10:01]
OKLAHOMA GOVERNMENT.ACOG FOR THE ACOG TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AREA.
CHRISTIE BATTERSON, HOUSING COMMITTEE RESOURCE DIRECTOR.
UM, I JUST WANTED TO INTRODUCE OUR GUEST SPEAKERS THIS EVENING.
UM, WE ARE PART OF, UM, SEVERAL CITIES THAT ARE PARTICIPATING IN THE LONG RANGE TRANSIT PLAN, UM, EMBARK, UM, US AND NORMAN, AS WELL AS ACOG.
UM, SO I'M JUST GONNA TURN IT OVER TO THEM 'CAUSE IT'S GONNA BE A HIGH LEVEL THING AND I DON'T WANNA STEAL TOO MUCH OF THEIR THUNDER.
SO I'D LIKE TO INTRODUCE CHIP NOLAN WITH EMBARK AND JOHN SHARP WITH ACOG.
THANKS FOR HAVING US, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
WE DO A 30 YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE REGION, AND WE LOOK AT A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT, UH, DIFFERENT ITEMS. BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, RIGHT NOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT REGIONAL TRANSIT IN OUR, UH, IN OUR, UH, STUDY AREA.
UH, WE HAVE ABOUT 1.3 MILLION FOLKS HERE OVER ABOUT A 30 YEAR PERIOD.
THE PLAY, THE R AREA GROWS BY ABOUT 30%.
SO WE'RE LOOKING, ADDING OBVIOUSLY AROUND 300,000 OR MORE FOLKS IN THE NEXT THREE YEARS.
HOW ARE THEY GONNA MOVE AROUND? IF THIS IS AS GOOD AS WE'RE GONNA GET TODAY, WE'RE GONNA BE IN A LITTLE BIT OF TROUBLE.
SO WE NEED TRANSIT AND OTHER FORMS OF TRANSPORTATION TO GIVE OUR FOLKS OPTIONS.
UM, THIS STUDY WILL REALLY HELP US IN REGARDS TO UPDATING WHAT WE DO HERE IN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA.
THE LAST TIME WE HAD A MAJOR TRANSIT PLAN, LIKE THIS WAS 2005, THE FIXED GUIDEWAY STUDY.
THIS PLAN WILL ALSO BE USED AS FEES INTO OUR 2050 PLAN FOR THE REGION.
SO IT'S VERY, VERY IMPORTANT AND WE'RE VERY HAPPY, UH, TO HELP THE THREE TRANSIT AGENCIES.
BUT ALSO IT ALSO TIES IN WITH THE RTA WORK THAT'S GOING ON HERE LOCALLY.
UH, SO I'LL HAND IT OVER TO CHIP AND LET HIM DO THE PRESENTATION.
UH, JUST WANNA ADD THAT I DID GROW UP IN EDMOND.
I LIVE IN CHIMNEY HILL, SO I WAS A LONGTIME EDMOND RESIDENT.
I'LL WALK THROUGH THE SLIDES TODAY.
SO WE'LL TALK ABOUT PROJECT OVERVIEW, VISION AND GOALS, PROJECT SCHEDULE.
LET'S, SO FIRST, UH, TALK ABOUT MAYBE EMBARK'S ROLE.
SO WE, UH, AS PART OF OUR MAPS PROGRAM, IT'S FUNDED, UH, ARENA PARK.
AND WITHIN THAT, UH, THERE WAS SOME PLANNING FUNDS SET ASIDE.
'CAUSE WE KNEW THERE WOULD BE A NEED.
AND, UH, AND SO WE RECOGNIZED THE NEED FOR THIS PLAN, AND WE APPROACHED ACOG, PARTNERED WITH THEM.
SO WE WERE BOTH, UH, PROVIDING THE FUNDS FOR THIS STUDY.
UH, SO OUR GOAL WAS TO, UH, GIVE THIS A REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE.
UH, AGAIN, AS JOHN MENTIONED, IT'S BEEN 20 YEARS SINCE WE'VE DONE A PLAN LIKE THIS.
SO, UH, LOOKING FORWARD TO WORKING WITH EVERYBODY ON THIS SLIDE.
UH, WE'VE, UH, MADE SURE TO INCLUDE EVERYBODY FROM, UH, CITYLINK AND CITY OF EDMOND, CITY OF NORMAN STAFF, ODOT, UH, OKLAHOMA CITY, ACOG, MAKING SURE THAT THIS IS A REALLY COLLABORATIVE EFFORT, UH, MAKING SURE THAT THEY'RE ALL INVOLVED AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.
SO, FIRST TALK ABOUT PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
WE'RE GOING TO, UH, LOOK AT OUR LOCAL SERVICES.
WE'RE GOING TO DEFINE CLEAR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND WE'RE GOING TO FINALLY LOOK AT HOW MUCH IT, UH, ARE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS GONNA COST US.
SO RIGHT NOW WE'RE, UH, WRAPPING UP OUR ASSESS PHASE, WHICH INCLUDED, UH, REVIEWING PREVIOUS PLANNING STUDIES, UH, BASELINE CONDITIONS, UH, NEEDS ASSESSMENT.
UH, WE'RE WRAPPING THAT UP NOW.
WE'RE GOING INTO THE SECOND PHASE, WHICH ARE EVALUATE PHASE, LOOKING AT NETWORK DEVELOPMENT, UH, SOME SCENARIO PLANNING, AND THEN SOME SORT OF FRAMEWORK TO EVALUATE THOSE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS.
AND FINALLY, UH, RESULTING IN, UH, RECOMMEND PHASE TALKING ABOUT THE OUTCOME.
SO FACILITIES, UH, FLEET COSTING, OPERATING AND CAPITAL FUNDS, UH, TO MAKE THAT VISION A REALITY.
SO AGAIN, UH, A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL ABOUT THE OUTCOMES OF THIS.
WE'LL BE LOOKING AT FACILITIES, UH, OPERATORS, FLEET, UH, CAPITAL AND OPERATING FUNDS.
UH, WE ALSO WANT TO KEEP IN MIND FUTURE UPDATES.
UH, SO WE WANT TO BUILD IN, UH, SOME SORT OF PROCESS TO REVISIT THIS IN A, IN A FEW YEARS TO MAKE SURE THAT, UH, WE CAN EXTEND THE USEFUL LIFE OF THIS PLAN AS LONG AS POSSIBLE AND CONTINUES TO STAY RELEVANT AS, AS THE REGION CHANGES.
AND THEN HOW DO WE PHASE THIS IN OVER TIME IN A WAY THAT MAKES SENSE.
UH, WE'LL ALSO BE DOING A PEER REVIEW WITH SOME OTHER, UH, OTHER REGIONS AROUND THE COUNTRY THAT HAVE GONE THROUGH THIS BEFORE.
UH, WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THEM? UH, WHAT STATE, WHAT MISTAKES CAN WE AVOID? UH, WHAT LESSONS CAN WE LEARN? SO, UH, SOME STEPS THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH RIGHT NOW.
WE HAD A GREAT WORKSHOP A FEW WEEKS AGO, UH, WITH STAFF.
UH, WE'RE GEARING UP FOR A TOWN HALL, UH, IN A FEW DAYS I'LL HAVE SOME MORE INFORMATION ON THAT BEGINNING.
WE'VE BEEN PRESENTING THIS TO NORMAN CITY COUNCIL TO YOU ALL THIS EVENING, OKLAHOMA CITY, ALL THE DIFFERENT BOARDS.
UH, WE'LL BE, UH, PRESENTING THIS TO RTA IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS AS WELL.
UH, AND THEN, UH, WE'LL HAVE ANOTHER ROUND OF INTERVIEWS, ANOTHER WORKSHOP, AND THEN, UH, HOPEFULLY PLAN APPROVAL, UH,
[00:15:01]
LATER THIS YEAR.UH, AND OUR, UH, PROJECT WEBSITE, TOWN HALL PROJECT WEBSITE IS LIVE OF, UH, INFORMATION ON THAT AT THE END FOR ONGOING, UH, PUBLIC FEEDBACK ABOUT THIS PLAN.
SO WE WORKED WITH ALL OF OUR PROJECT PARTNERS, UH, STAKEHOLDERS TO, UH, DEVELOP OUR VISION AND GOALS.
SO WE WANT TO, UH, PROVIDE COMMUNITIES WITH MEANINGFUL ACCESS TO TRANSIT, CREATE A COMPELLING RIDER EXPERIENCE, UH, OFFERING COMPETITIVE SERVICE CHOICES SO THAT PEOPLE WANT TO USE TRANSIT SO THAT IT'S A CONVENIENT OPTION FOR THEM.
AND THEN UTILIZING RESOURCES EFFECTIVELY, WE'RE GONNA HAVE CONSTRAINED BUDGETS.
SO HOW DO WE TARGET OUR, OUR DOLLARS ON THINGS THAT, THAT, UH, ARE GONNA MAKE THE MOST IMPACT? AND THEN WE'LL USE THESE GOALS TO DEVELOP SPECIFIC, UH, METRICS, UH, AND HOW WE DEVELOP AND SCORE ON DIFFERENT SCENARIOS SO THAT WE CAN, UH, FIND, CREATE A VISION THAT ALIGNS WITH THESE GOALS.
SO THEN WE'LL BE TALKING ABOUT DEVELOPING A DRAFT VISION.
SO WE'VE GOT THREE PHASES HERE.
THIS IS JUST KIND OF A, A DRAFT.
THIS WILL, THIS WILL CHANGE AS WE GO THROUGH THE PLANNING PROCESS, BUT KIND OF, WE'VE GOT THREE BUCKETS.
UH, WHAT'S IN EACH BUCKET? MAY, MAY CHANGE SLIGHTLY, BUT WE'VE GOT RESOURCED PROJECTS.
THESE ARE THINGS THAT HAVE A, A CERTAIN LEVEL OF FUNDING COMMITTED.
SO THE NORTHWEST RAPID LINE LAUNCHED LAST DECEMBER.
THE, THE TWO OTHER BRT LINES ARE FUNDED THROUGH OUR MAPS PROGRAM THROUGH IN OKLAHOMA CITY.
UH, AND THEN WE HAVE OUR CATALYTIC REGIONAL PROJECTS.
UH, THOSE WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT LONGER TIMEFRAME.
UH, MAYBE, UH, 10 TO 15 YEARS, POTENTIALLY TIMEFRAME, A LITTLE BIT LONGER.
UH, THAT'S OUR NORTH SOUTH COMMUTER RAIL LINE FROM EDMONT TO NORMAN.
UH, AND THEN FINALLY, SOME UNCONSTRAINED REGIONAL PROJECTS THAT MAY BE NEAR THE END OF, OF THE PLANNING HORIZON FOR THIS LONG RANGE TRANSIT PLANT.
UH, LOOKING AT A-A-R-T-A LINE OUT EAST OF TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, AN AIRPORT LINE, UH, AND THEN, UH, BRT LINE OUT WEST, AND A POTENTIAL, UH, BRT EXTENSION.
BUT THEN ONE OF THE, THE BIGGEST THINGS THAT WE WANNA DO IN THIS STUDY IS TO, TO START TO TALK ABOUT HOW OUR LOCAL SERVICE INTERACTS WITH SOME OF THESE HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT CORRIDORS.
AS THESE DIFF, AS THESE HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT CORRIDORS COME ONLINE, HOW DO WE ADJUST OUR LOCAL SERVICE IN A WAY THAT MAKES SENSE? WHAT FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED, WHAT HUBS, WHAT, UH, CONNECTIONS AND TRANSFERS ARE GONNA NEED TO HAPPEN FOR THIS TRANSIT NETWORK TO MAKE SENSE AND TO, UH, TO BE, UH, CONVENIENT FOR, UH, FOR OUR CUSTOMERS.
SO WE'LL BE LOOKING AT, UH, TYPES OF SERVICE, UH, UH, FREQUENCY.
HOW, HOW OFTEN DOES THE BUS COME BY WHEN YOU'RE STANDING AT A BUS STOP? UH, WE'LL BE LOOKING AT SERVICE SPANS.
UH, WE'LL BE LOOKING AT ALL OF THOSE SO THAT WE'RE KIND OF CREATING A HOPE, HOPEFULLY A HOLISTIC REGIONAL TRANSIT NETWORK AND NOT INDIVIDUAL, UH, BUS SYSTEMS FOR EACH CITY.
SO A PROJECT SCHEDULE, UH, AGAIN, RIGHT NOW WE ARE WRAPPING UP OUR ASSESS PHASE GOING IN FOR OUR EVALUATE PHASE, AND FINALLY OUR RECOMMEND PHASE AND COORDINATING WITH THE RTA AS WE GO SO THAT WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE.
UH, SO, AND THEN OUR TOWN HALL, HOPEFULLY YOU'LL JOIN US THURSDAY FROM 11 THREE TO ONE, UH, WEBSITE IS CONNECT CENTRAL OK.COM.
UH, WE WILL POST THE RECORDING OF THE TOWN HALL ON THE WEBSITE.
IF YOU'RE NOT ABLE TO JOIN US AT THAT TIME, YOU'LL FIND MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT WEBSITE, AND WE'LL BE DOING A MUCH DEEPER DIVE IN THE RESULTS OF OUR ASSESS PHASE DURING THIS TOWN HALL.
SO, AND THAT'S, UH, MY PRESENTATION.
UH, YOU KNOW, HOPEFULLY, UH, YOU'LL HAVE ME BACK AS WE GO THROUGH THIS PLANNING STUDY TO HAVE SOME MORE EXCITING UPDATES.
BUT RIGHT NOW, UH, JUST KIND OF GIVE YOU A HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW OF, OF WHAT WE'RE DOING.
TRY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, UH, COUNSEL ANY QUESTIONS.
UH, ALWAYS TELL THE PERSONAL STORY THAT I GREW UP ON REGIONAL TRANS TRANSIT, UH, BEFORE I ACTUALLY MOVED HERE.
AND THAT'S HOW IN THE TWO MAJOR CITIES I LIVED IN BEFORE, UH, THAT'S HOW WE GOT AROUND.
AND AS I WOULD JUST LOVE FOR EDMOND TO, TO STILL BE A PARTNER IN THIS REGIONAL SOLUTION FOR TRANSPORTATION, BECAUSE I ENVISION ONE DAY THAT YOU'LL BE ABLE TO GO TO THE, SOME STATION HERE OR GET ON SOME BUS HERE AND GET, GO ALL THE WAY DOWN TO NORMAN AND MAYBE TO EAT, WATCH AN ACTIVITY DOWN THERE, THEN COME BACK AND NEVER BE IN YOUR CAR, GO TO OKLAHOMA CITY, OR, OR WHEN PEOPLE AS TINKER AIR FORCE BASE CONTINUES TO EXPAND, THE WORKFORCE CAN LIVE ALL THE WAY OUT IN, UH, YUKON AND JUST GET ON THE BUS OR SHUTTLE AND COME ON IN INTO WORK.
AND WITH THE FREQUENCY, THEY WON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT MISSING TRANSPORTATION.
IT'S, IT'S JUST, TO ME, IT'S JUST, THERE'S SO MANY OPTIONS HERE, UM, THAT I THINK IT'S JUST GREAT THAT, UM, AND I JUST HOPE EDMOND CONTINUES TO STAY AND BE AS STRONG REGIONAL PARTNER AS WE GO FORWARD.
[00:20:01]
TO WORK WITH YOU ALL ON THIS PROJECT.AND I WAS JUST GONNA ECHO SOME OF THE MAYOR'S COMMENTS.
UM, I DON'T KNOW IF Y'ALL HAVE NOTICED, BUT SOME PEOPLE IN ADMIN ARE RESISTANT TO CHANGE.
UM, AND, UM, BUT I THINK ONE OF THE STATISTICS YOU OFFERED IS WE'RE GONNA GROW BY 30% IN THE NOT SO DISTANT FUTURE, RIGHT? PEOPLE ARE THE NUMBER ONE COMPLAINT, RIGHT? IS TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND DIFFICULTY GETTING AROUND.
AND THOSE ROAD PROJECTS ARE NOT GETTING ANY CHEAPER.
AND FRANKLY, THERE ARE TIMES WE CAN'T EXPAND ANY FURTHER BECAUSE OF PROPERTY LINES AND SO FORTH.
SO I WOULD JUST HOPE THAT FOLKS IN THE COMMUNITY WOULD BE OPEN-MINDED ABOUT THIS AS A SOLUTION TO ONE OF THE NUMBER ONE COMPLAINTS THAT PEOPLE HAVE.
UM, AND YEAH, IT COULD BE REALLY POWERFUL.
AND EVENTUALLY, HOPEFULLY WE GET REGIONAL, REGIONAL TRANSIT.
AND YOU DIDN'T MENTION FOOTBALL GAMES, BUT YOU KNOW, PEOPLE CAN GO DOWN TO NORMAN FOOTBALL GAME.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE TRAFFIC FOOTBALL DOWN THERE.
AND EVENTUALLY, I'D LOVE TO BE ABLE TO TAKE REGIONAL TRANSIT TO THE AIRPORT, THEN I DON'T HAVE TO PAY FOR PARKING AT THE AIRPORT.
UM, SO I APPRECIATE THE INFORMATION AND LAYING THIS GROUNDWORK AND ANYBODY LISTENING, I JUST HOPE THAT THEY'LL BE OPEN, UM, TO THIS AS A SOLUTION TO SOME OF THE, THE ISSUES THAT PEOPLE HAVE.
HOPEFULLY IT WILL HELP US ALSO WITH A SOLUTION WITH FOLKS WHO, UH, WORK IN EDMOND AND DON'T LIVE HERE MM-HMM
AND, UM, I'M HOPING THAT WILL MAKE THEM THAT A LITTLE EASIER FOR THEM TO GET TO THE PLACE THAT THEY WANT TO WORK AND LOVE TO WORK AND TO HANG OUT.
OUR, OUR TOWN IS, IS SO MUCH FUN AND IT'S, YOU KNOW, WE KEEP TALKING ABOUT IT GROWING AND THE POPULATION AND THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION.
WELL, THIS IS AN AMAZING SOLUTION TO THAT REALLY IMPORTANT ISSUE TO A BUNCH OF PEOPLE.
AND NOT TO MENTION FOLKS WHO CAN'T DRIVE FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER, GIVING THEM MORE ABILITY TO BE INDEPENDENT TOO.
PLANTING THAT SEED FOR A TREE THAT WE MIGHT NOT EVEN BE AROUND TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF, BUT FOR THE FUTURE.
THANK YOU FOR ALL THAT YOU'RE DOING.
AND, AND THANK YOU TO THE FOLKS LIKE JAMES BOGGS, WHO'S SERVING ON THE RTA COMMITTEE, UM, AND REPRESENTING EDMUND WELL.
LOOKING, LOOKING FORWARD TO MORE.
THAT WAS JUST FOR INFORMATION, UM, ON THE PRESENTATION.
NEXT IS ITEM NINE CS, CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE
[C. Consideration of Approval of an Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding with the Edmond Land Conservancy Regarding the Deed of Conservation Easement for the Land Located South of Hafer Park Previously Labeled as the Preserve at Hafer Park, Now Known as the Charles D. Lamb Nature Preserve. (Ward 1)]
EDMUND LAND CONSERVANCY REGARDING THE DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR THE LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF HAYFORD PARK, PREVIOUSLY LABELED AS HE PRESERVE AT PARK, NOW KNOWN AS CHARLES D. LAMB NATURE PRESERVE.MAYOR AND COUNCIL, BRAD RAINEY, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR.
UM, JUST, UH, HAD A FEW CHANGES TO THE MOU WITH, WITH THE ELC, THE EDMOND LAND CONSERVANCY.
I JUST WANT TO GO OVER THOSE WITH, WITH YOU TONIGHT.
UM, THIS CHANGE WAS LARGELY DRIVEN BY AN ITEM THAT WAS EARLIER ON YOUR CONSENT AGENDA, WHICH WAS A GRANT SUBMISSION TO THE LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND TO CONSTRUCT THIS PROJECT.
UM, WE'RE GOING AFTER $800,000, AND IN ORDER TO APPLY FOR THE, UH, GRANT, WE HAD TO JUST MAKE SOME CHANGES TO THE MOU.
SO, SO IT'S JUST A MAP OF THE, THE PROJECT RIGHT HERE.
THIS IS, UH, HAYFORD PARK RIGHT HERE, I THINK PELICAN BAYS AROUND.
THERE'S, UM, SHOPPING CENTER THERE, 15TH STREET BRYANT, AND THEN BRIDGE OVER SPRING CREEK THAT'LL BE BUILT AS PART OF THE PROJECT.
UM, THIS LITTLE TRAIL CONNECTION WILL BE OUTSIDE OF THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT.
UM, THE GREEN IS AN IMPROVED LOOP.
THE CIRCLE IS AN OUTDOOR NATURE CENTER THAT'S, THAT'S CALLED FOR IN, IN THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND THE YELLOW OR UNIMPROVED TRAILS THAT WOULD BE MORE LIKE JUST HIKING TRAILS, BARE EARTH HIKING TRAILS.
UM, JUST SOME PICTURES OF WHAT THE IMPROVED TRAIL, UH, MIGHT LOOK LIKE, UH, GOING FOR NATURAL SURFACE, BUT A DA COMPLIANT.
UM, SO JUST A TYPE OF MATERIAL THAT WOULD, WOULD WORK WITH THAT FOR YOU TO KIND OF REVIEW.
SO BRAD, WOULD THIS BE THE GREEN LOOP? AND THIS WOULD BE THE YELLOW LOOP AT THE BOTTOM? I KNOW, OR NOT NECESSARILY.
I, I THINK THAT'S WAS A LITTLE THINK THE, THE GREEN LOOP, IT'S, IT'S THE PRODUCT, UM, THAT WE, IT'S A, A GRANITE WITH A BINDER THAT WE USE THE, SO BASICALLY THE GREEN LOOP WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT WIDER.
IT WOULD BE, UM, HARD MEET A DA REQUIREMENTS.
THE YELLOW LOOP WOULD BE MORE LIKE A HIKING TRAIL IF, UM, IN A MORE REMOTE AREA.
SO, UM, I'LL GO BACK REAL QUICK.
BUT ANY, ANYWAYS, UM, THAT, THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? YEAH.
UM, SO CONSERVATION EASEMENT, UM, WAS AGREED UPON IN
[00:25:01]
2023.AND THEN AN MOU WAS, WAS ENTERED IN TO KIND OF ESTABLISH WHAT EACH PARTY WAS GOING TO DO.
AND IN THAT MOU THERE WAS A TIMELINE, UM, FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.
AND THAT WAS KIND OF THE ISSUE WE NEEDED TO ADDRESS IN THE MOU, IS THAT WITH A GRANT, WE'RE KIND OF SUBJECT TO THE GRANT TIMELINE, SO WE HAVE TO WAIT TO BE NOTIFIED IF WE GOT IT.
THEN THERE'S A GRANT AGREEMENT AND THAT, THAT MIGHT TAKE A LITTLE BIT, BUT BOTH US AND THE LC FEEL THAT, UM, $800,000 WAS, WAS WORTH WAITING A LITTLE BIT OF TIME.
FOR, UM, THE GRANT'S GONNA BE TURNED IN A COUPLE DAYS.
SO WE'VE GOT IT READY TO GO, TO BE TURNED IN.
AND, UH, YEAH, THAT'S, THAT'S THE MAIN THING.
AND THEN JUST A FEW OTHER THINGS THAT IT COVERS KIND OF PROVIDES A, A FRAMEWORK IF YOU WANNA TRY TO GO AFTER OTHER GRANTS, UM, ADDRESSES SOME DESIGN ELEMENTS, SO SPECIFIES THAT THE, UM, MAIN TRAIL LOOP WILL BE A DA COMPLIANT.
IT GOES OVER KIND OF A RANGE OF TRAIL WIDTH AND THEN PREFERRED MATERIALS, AND THEN JUST THE NAME CHANGE THAT YOU'VE ALREADY APPROVED, THAT'S ENTERED INTO THE MOU.
AND THIS IS LESS TO DO WITH THE MOU, BUT JUST UPDATES ON THE PROJECT FOR YOU ALL.
AND FOR THE PUBLIC, IF THEY'RE CURIOUS, IT'S UNDER DESIGN.
NEXT STEP THEY'LL GET OUT THERE AND, UM, SURVEY AND STAKE OUT THE TRAIL.
SO FLAGGING WHAT THE TRAIL WILL ACTUALLY LOOK LIKE, THAT SHOULD HAPPEN VERY SOON.
UM, THERE NEEDS TO BE DESIGN WORK DONE ON THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, SPECIFICALLY MODELING OF, UM, HOW THE WATER FLOWS AND HOW THAT BRIDGE WILL AFFECT THE WATER FLOW THERE.
UM, WE'LL AWAIT THE RESULT RESULTS OF THE GRANT.
WE CAN'T DO ANY CONSTRUCTION ON IT UNTIL WE KNOW WHETHER WE GOT THE GRANT OR NOT, AND WE GET A NOTICE TO PROCEED.
UM, RESTORATION WAS PULLED OUT OF THE GRANT, SO THAT'S LIKE REMOVING INVASIVE SPECIES AND, UM, HAZARDOUS TREES AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
UM, A A DRAFT OF THAT PLAN IS BEING, UM, DONE BY URBAN FORESTRY DEPARTMENT IN HOUSE, AND WE'LL HAVE THAT SOON AND HOPEFULLY BEGIN WORK HERE IN THE NEXT COUPLE MONTHS.
UM, JUST, JUST WORKING ON SOME OF THE, THE PLANT, THE VEGETATION THAT SHOULDN'T BE OUT THERE.
AND THEN JUST A NOTE, WE, WE WANT TO KEEP OUR PARTNERS WELL-INFORMED.
UM, WE HAVE A STAFF MEMBER THAT'LL PROVIDE A MONTHLY UPDATE TO THE ELC JUST SO THEY KNOW IT'S GOING ON.
I THINK EVERYBODY'S EXCITED FOR IT, BUT THERE'S A LOT OF WORK THAT GOES BE ON BEHIND THE SCENES BEFORE WE DO A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.
SO A BUNCH OF PEOPLE REVIEWED THIS AND, UH, HAVE APPROVED RECOMMENDED APPROVAL UNANIMOUSLY.
AND I'LL ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS IF, IF YOU HAVE, UH, I MIGHT ASK TOO, AS WE'RE GETTING OUT OF HOPEFULLY THE DESIGN PHASE AND ACTUALLY THINGS ARE GONNA START TO HAPPEN.
UM, I'D LOVE TO HAVE PERIODIC REPORTS HERE AT COUNCIL MEETINGS.
UM, THE MAYOR AND I HAD SOMEONE BEND OUR EAR NOT TOO LONG AGO AND JUST FELT LIKE WE WEREN'T TALKING ABOUT IT ENOUGH MM-HMM
AND THAT WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT IT MORE SO PEOPLE KNOW THINGS ARE HAPPENING.
UM, IT'S JUST NOT AS VISIBLE RIGHT NOW.
JUST PUTTING A PLUGIN FOR THAT.
LOTS OF WORK HAS BEEN DONE, IS BEING DONE, CONTINUES TO BE DONE.
UM, BUT MAYBE, I DON'T KNOW, IN A MONTH OR SO, MAYBE JUST LET US KNOW HOW THE GRANT PROCESS IS GOING AND WHAT'S HAPPENING OR HAPPENED OR NOT.
AND WE'LL, AND THEN PEOPLE WON'T YELL AT THE MAYOR AND ME
WE'RE HOPING THE MONTHLY UPDATE WILL WILL HELP TAKE THAT PRESSURE OFF YOU AND WE CERTAINLY INCLUDE YOU ALL IN IT.
AND WHENEVER YOU WANT ME OUT HERE TO TALK ABOUT IT, I'M HAPPY TO COME UP AND TALK ABOUT IT.
'CAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE, AND, AND I DO THINK THAT WILL HELP WITH THE EDMOND LAND CONSERVANCY, JUST THAT COMMUNICATION BACK AND FORTH, BUT ALSO TO THE PUBLIC SOMEHOW.
ANOTHER GREAT PROJECT IN, IN THE LOOP.
APPRECIATE, I MEAN, WE'RE ABLE TO LEVERAGE THE FUNDS THAT TAXPAYERS, UM, THROUGH THE TEMPORARY SALES TAX ROAD RAISED.
UM, BUT THIS WILL JUST KIND OF FURTHER LEVERAGE THAT AND ALLOW US TO DO EVEN MORE WITH IT AND WANT TO THANK THE FOLKS IN THE CITY WHO ARE REALLY GOING AFTER ALL THE DIFFERENT GRANTS MM-HMM
UM, AND MAXIMIZING THE MONIES THAT WE DO HAVE.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS, COUNSEL? SO WE NEED A, WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO, THIS IS CONSIDERATION APPROVAL OF, OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MOU, UH, MOTION TO APPROVE.
THAT AMENDMENT IS ISSUED BY APPROVED.
NEXT IS ITEM 10, IS THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS FIRST ITEM IS 10, A CASE NUMBER
[A. Case No. Z24-00020; Public Hearing and Consideration of Ordinance No. ___ Rezoning from “D-3 PUD” Office Commercial Planned Unit Development, “D-3” Office Commercial, and “D-0” Suburban Office to “PUD Z24-00020” Planned Unit Development for Turtle Creek Storage, Located on the South Side of East 15th Street, East of Bryant Avenue. (BLD, LLC; Ward 3) This item will be continued to the City Council meeting on February 10, 2025.]
Z 24 DASH 0 2 0 PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER.UM, THIS WON'T HAVE AN ORDINANCE NUMBER IF YOU'RE CONTINUING IT.
OH, YOU KNOW WHAT, WE'RE CONTINUING THAT.
CONTINUE MY, MY FAULT COUNSEL ON ITEM 10 A.
WE DO NEED A MOTION TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO 10 TO FEBRUARY 10TH, 2025.
[00:30:02]
UH, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.THAT ITEMS IS HEREBY CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 10TH, 2025.
NEXT IS 10 B CASE NUMBER SP TWO THREE DASH 0 0 0 0 9 PUBLIC
[B. Case No. SP23-00009; Public Hearing and Consideration for a Site Plan Application for Centerline Plumbing, Located West of Broadway Avenue, on Broadway Court. (Centerline Plumbing; Ward 3)]
HEARING CONSIDERATION FOR A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE CENTER LINE PLUMBING LOCATED WEST OF BROADWAY AVENUE ON BROADWAY COURT CENTER.LINE PLUMBING IS THE APPLICANT.
I JUST WANT MAKE SURE YOU'RE HERE FOR OKAY.
SO SIR, UM, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR A LOCATION CALLED CENTER LINE PLUMBING.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WEST OF BROADWAY ON THE NORTH END OF BROADWAY COURT.
THE SITE'S APPROXIMATELY 27,000 SQUARE FEET.
THE SITE IS ZONED E TWO, WHICH IS OUR OPEN DISPLAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
IN TERMS OF THE CASE ITSELF, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE BUILDING APPROXIMATELY 7,000 SQUARE FEET AND 25 FEET TALL.
ACCESS WILL BE FROM TWO DRIVEWAYS OFF OF BROADWAY COURT.
AS AS PROPOSED THERE ARE TWO VARIANCES REQUESTED TO LANDSCAPING.
ONE IS A REDUCTION IN THE PERIMETER BUFFER FROM THE REQUIRED 10 FEET, UM, IN WIDTH TO THREE FEET.
AND ONE IS A REDUCTION IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA FROM THE REQUIRED 2,600 SQUARE FEET TO 1100 SQUARE FEET, WHICH ALSO RESULTED IN A REDUCTION OF THE REQUIRED FRONTAGE AREA FROM AT LEAST 1300 SQUARE FEET TO 620 SQUARE FEET.
AT THE REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 7TH, 2025, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO APPROVE BY VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO.
STAFF IS HAPPY TO TRY AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
COUNSEL, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? YES.
I MEAN, I'M, I'M CURIOUS WHY THE APPLICANT FELT IT WAS NECESSARY TO REDUCE THE LANDSCAPING BY SO MUCH.
I MEAN, WERE THERE LIMITATIONS IN THE PROPERTY? I KNOW THAT WE'RE REALLY, UM, I KNOW THIS DOESN'T COMPLETELY FACE ONTO BROADWAY, BUT IT IS AWFULLY CLOSE AND I THINK VISIBLE.
UM, WE'RE CERTAINLY WANTING TO IMPROVE THE APPEARANCE OF THIS AREA, SO IT JUST STRUCK ME AS A REALLY LARGE VARIANCE.
I THINK THE APPLICANT WOULD BE BETTER EQUIPPED TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION.
BEFORE THE APPLICANT ANSWERS THE, THE STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH THE VARIANCE, WHAT, WHY IS THAT? SO IT'S A, IT'S A BIT OF A TECHNICALITY.
UM, STAFF TRIES TO NOT TAKE A STANCE ON VARIANCES.
UM, OBVIOUSLY WE PREFER THAT YOU FOLLOW THE RULES.
UM, SO WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL BASED ON THE TECHNICAL DETAILS OF THE, THE CASE ITSELF AND WHETHER IT IS ALIGNS THE ZONING DISTRICT.
AND THEN, UM, THEN WE ALLOW THE PUBLIC PROCESS TO MOVE FORWARD.
UM, OF COURSE, IF IT DOESN'T HAVE A VARIANCE, THEY STOP AT PLANNING COMMISSION.
UM, BUT THEY DO HAVE A VARIANCE.
THEY NEED TO COME AND PLEAD THE CASE, UM, AND SHOW THEIR THEIR HARDSHIP TO COUNSEL.
BUT I MEAN, THE STAFF'S OKAY WITH THE VARIANCE.
I I THINK IT'S MORE, AGAIN, TECHNICALLY AND LEGALLY IT'S OKAY, BUT THEY'RE NOT MAKING A JUDGMENT CALL, IS WHAT I'M HEARING.
OBVIOUSLY IT'S EASIER FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED IF, IF PEOPLE WILL FOLLOW THE RULES AS WRITTEN.
UM, BUT OBVIOUSLY IT'S, IT'S DIFFICULT FOR STAFF TO FORCE FORCE APPLICANT'S HAND IN ALL CASES, SO, OKAY.
SO THIS, WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT, THIS LOOKS LIKE, UM, AN INDUSTRIAL AREA.
I MEAN, FROM THE, FROM THE MAP HERE MM-HMM
WHEN I SAY INDUSTRIAL, IT'S, IT'S, THERE'S A LOT OF CONCRETE THERE.
I DON'T SEE A LOT OF VEGETATION IN ALL OF THE OTHER, UM, DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE AROUND THERE.
AM I, AM I MISSING THAT IS NO, NOT AT ALL.
I THINK THAT'S A, THAT'S JUST A LEGACY OF WHEN THIS AREA WAS DEVELOPED.
UM, YOU KNOW, BEFORE WE HAD ROBUST, UH, LANDSCAPE STANDARDS, UM, WAS, IS PROBABLY WHEN MOST OF THIS AREA WAS DEVELOPED.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? WE DID A, FOR THE APPLICANT, WE DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR YOU.
IS THERE ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD BEFORE WE START ASKING YOU QUESTIONS? OH, YES.
MY NAME'S OPHELIA CIO WITH HEWITT ZELLERS.
WE'RE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS ON THE PROJECT.
UM, JUST WANNA SAY, WE DID WORK VERY CLOSELY WITH THE CITY, UM, BACK AND FORTH WITH LANDSCAPING, SPECIFICALLY MYSELF SPEAKING AND HAVING MEETINGS.
[00:35:01]
SOME CONSTRAINTS ON THE SITE, UM, WITH CIRCULATION AND PARKING.UM, REGARDING THE FRONT BUFFER, WE WEREN'T ABLE TO GET THE 10 FOOT BUFFER, BUT WE DID PROVIDE A, UM, SCREENING WALL THERE WITH EVERGREENS, UM, TO KIND OF COMPENSATE FOR SOME OF THAT.
AND THEN REGARDING THE SQUARE, UM, FEET THAT IS REQUIRED, EVEN THOUGH WE WERE NOT ABLE TO MEET IT AGAIN BASED ON SITE CONSTRAINTS, THE EASEMENTS ON THE SIDE AS WELL WHERE WE CAN'T ADD LANDSCAPING.
UH, WE DID EXCEED THE PLANTING UNIT REQUIREMENTS, UM, ON THE PROJECT.
SO COUNSEL, ANY QUESTIONS FOR ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I GUESS WHEN YOU TALKED ABOUT, UM, CONSTRAINTS WITH THE PROPERTY, UM, I, I'D LIKE TO HEAR A LITTLE BIT MORE SPECIFICALLY.
SO IF YOU LOOK ON THE EAST SIDE THERE, THERE'S AN EASEMENT THROUGH THERE.
UM, YOU KNOW, USUALLY WE WOULD'VE BEEN ABLE TO ADD SOME LANDSCAPING THROUGH THERE, BUT BECAUSE OF THAT EASEMENT WE WERE NOT, NOT ABLE TO DO THAT.
UM, THIS IS A VERY NICE BUILDING, UM, FOR LIKE, UM, MAYOR POINTED OUT, UM, JUST GIVEN THE SITE DEVELOPMENT, IT'S A REALLY NICE BUILDING, UM, THAT IS BEING PLACED ON THERE.
IT'S, AND THERE'LL BE VANS KIND OF CIRCULATING THROUGH THE BACK, SO WE DID NEED TO PROVIDE MORE, UM, AREA FOR VANS TO FIT THROUGH THERE FOR FIRE, UM, FIRE TRUCKS TO CIRCULATE THROUGH THERE AS WELL.
UM, IN THE FRONT WE HAVE OFFICE BUILDINGS AND WE NEEDED TO ALSO PROVIDE, UM, MORE, UM, PARKING FOR PEOPLE TO COME IN.
AND, UH, SO THOSE WERE SOME OF THE SITE CONSTRAINTS, THE PARKING REQUIREMENT AND THEN THE SITE CIRCULATION.
AND THEN WHERE IS THE EASEMENT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT? IT'S ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
THERE'S ALSO AN EASEMENT TO THE NORTH FOR SANITARY, SIR.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW? COUNSEL? ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH RIGHT NOW.
UM, AND ANY QUESTION, COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON THIS ITEM RIGHT NOW? ITEM 10 B, IS THERE ANY QUESTION, COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE? CAN YOU, NONE.
COUNSEL, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO ON THIS ITEM? FURTHER DISCUSSION? I AM STILL STRUGGLING WITH WHETHER THIS IS THE BEST OR MOST SQUARE FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPING THAT'S POSSIBLE.
I JUST, I DON'T, I DON'T WANT TO GET IN THE HABIT OF MAKING THIS LARGE OF A VARIANCE.
THERE'S A REASON WE HAVE THEM THERE, RIGHT? MM-HMM
UM, I UNDERSTAND, UM, YOU ALL'S POINT.
UM, I KNOW WHERE THIS AREA IS.
IT'S, THERE'S, YOU HAVE, I REMEMBER ACROSS THE STREET WE APPROVED SOME TYPE OF GREENHOUSE GOING IN THERE, THE RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM HERE.
AND I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S STILL AN OPERATION OR NOT.
THIS IS BEFORE MEDICAL MARIJUANA CAME AROUND.
UM, BUT IT'S, IT IS, IT'S NOT AN INDUSTRIAL AREA, BUT IT'S A, IT'S A, IT'S A, I DON'T KNOW HOW TO SAY IT'S A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
IT'S, IT'S, IT'S, IT'S, IT'S A 10 BUILDINGS BACK HERE ON, THAT'S BASICALLY THE WHOLE STREET ALL THE WAY UP TO, TO WHEN YOU, WHEN YOU GO NORTH AND YOU FINALLY RUN INTO THE, UM, OIL CHANGE, AND THEN YOU MAKE A RIGHT, YOU RUN INTO JIMMY'S EGG AND THE CLEANERS MM-HMM
IT'S, UM, AND THEN ACROSS THE STREET FROM IT, YOU HAVE THE CAJUN PLACE.
AND, AND SO IT'S, THERE'S NOT MUCH GREENERY BACK THERE RIGHT NOW.
AND, AND I DON'T THINK I REMEMBER CORRECTLY BEING ON COUNCIL WHEN WE APPROVED SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENTS ON THE, ACROSS THE STREET.
WE DIDN'T, THEY ASKED FOR VARIANCE TOO ON THEIR, THEIR GREENERY.
COUNSEL, WHAT'D YOU LIKE TO DO? CAN YOU SHOW ME WHERE THE GREENERY'S GONNA BE PLANTED? MR. LANDSCAPE PLAN? UM, DO I,
[00:40:04]
THAT WASN'T ME.UM, SO THEY'LL DO A, THE SCREENING WALL THAT THE APPLICANT INDICATED, IT'LL BE ALONG HERE, ALONG THERE.
THIS IS THEIR FRONTAGE, UM, ON BROADWAY COURT HERE.
AND THEN THERE'LL BE PLANTING AREA HERE, HERE IN THE PARKING LOT.
SO WE HAVE, UM, YOU KNOW, THE TERMINAL ISLANDS, THE INTERIOR ISLANDS, UM, AND THEN I, I BELIEVE THERE'S A, THERE'S A BIT OF LANDSCAPING.
THEY'RE ABLE TO KIND OF FIT IN THERE NEXT TO THAT EASEMENT.
SO THE LANDSCAPING WILL BE BETWEEN THE ROAD AND THE BUILDING, CORRECT? YEAH.
THAT'S PART OF OUR REQUIREMENTS.
UM, WHEREVER THERE'S, UH, FRONTAGE, WE HAVE BOTH FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS AND THEN, UH, SCREENING BETWEEN PARKING AND CIRCULATION BETWEEN THE, THAT AREA AND THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
SO IS THERE ANY ON THE NORTH OR WAS THERE NO ROOM THERE? I BELIEVE THIS IS WHERE THAT, UH, SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT RUNS THROUGH HERE THAT WAS REFERENCED.
AND THEN THIS IS THE SITE TO THE NORTH IS DEVELOPED.
AND THEN BROADWAY IS ACTUALLY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PROPERTY TO THE, UM, EAST, RIGHT? YES, YES.
AND THERE'S AN EASEMENT THERE IN BETWEEN.
THEY'RE INDICATING AN, AN EASEMENT IN THIS, ON THIS PART OF THEIR SITE.
AND THEN BECAUSE IT'S A PLUMBING BUSINESS AND THERE'S GONNA BE VANS GOING IN AND OUT GETTING SUPPLIES, THAT'S THE CIRCULATION YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
RIGHT? CAN I YES, PLEASE COME BACK UP.
UM, YES, BUT THERE IS, UM, A BUILDING BUILDING RIGHT BEFORE WE, SO OUR PROPERTY DOESN'T ABUT RIGHT NEXT TO, TO THE EAST BROADWAY.
THERE'S A RIGHT, I UNDERST UNDERSTAND.
AND, AND LIKE I SAID, WE, EVEN THOUGH WE DIDN'T GET, GET THE AREA FOR LANDSCAPING THAT WE WANTED TO, EVEN THOUGH WE WORKED REALLY HARD WITH AVA, UM, TO ACCOMPLISH THAT, WE EXCEEDED THE PLANTING UNIT REQUIREMENTS BY, I THINK, I THOUGHT I CALCULATED LIKE 38%.
WHAT WAS THE LAST YOU SAID? SO I THINK THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE, THE AREA REQUIREMENTS AND THEN THE UNIT REQUIREMENTS.
EVEN THOUGH WE WERE NOT ABLE TO MEET THE, THE AREA REQUIREMENTS, JUST GIVEN THE CONSTRAINT OF OUR SITE, WE DID EXCEED THE UNIT REQUIREMENT AND WE ALSO EXCEEDED THE EVERGREEN, UM, PLANT UNIT REQUIREMENT.
YOU ALSO EXCEEDED WHAT, SORRY? THE, UH, EVERGREEN PLANT UNIT REQUIREMENT.
SO WE HAVE MORE EVERGREENS THAN ARE REQUIRED ON THE SITE.
I I MEAN I HEAR YOU, BUT IT'S, THEY CAN BE REALLY SMALL PLANTS.
BUT WE DON'T HAVE, I MEAN, IF WE'RE SUPPOSED TO DO 10% LANDSCAPE AREA, WHICH IS 2,600 SQUARE FEET, AND WE'RE NOT EVEN DOING HALF THAT, SO IT MIGHT BE THREE AND A HALF, 4%.
I, I DON'T THINK THAT THERE WOULD BE ANYTHING OTHER THAN WE CAN DO OTHER THAN SHRINK THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING.
UH, AT THIS STAGE WE'RE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO MEET THE, WE, WE REALLY TRIED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT.
AND IT WAS SUGGESTED TO YOU AT WHEN YOUR, IN YOUR MEETINGS WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND MR. BRIAN'S TEAM, THAT YOU WERE COMING FOR A FAIRLY STRONG VARIANCE AND YOU WERE, WAS THAT SUGGESTED TO YOU TO MAYBE TRY TO GO BACK AND DO MORE? UM, I DIDN'T, I DIDN'T FORESEE US NEEDING A VARIANCE, UM, AT FIRST.
SO THAT WASN'T THE ORIGINAL INTENTION.
I THINK IT'S JUST THE, THE CONSTRAINTS AFTER WE HAD TO COME BACK AND ADD MORE PARKING AND THEN THE CIRCULATION AS THE SITE BEGAN TO DEVELOP, WE BECAME MORE AND MORE CONSTRAINED WITH WHERE WE COULD, UM, PLACE LANDSCAPING.
SO THE VARIANCES DUE TO, UM, THEM WERE THE STAFF REQUESTING, WHAT DO YOU THINK? UM, SO IT'S FOR TWO THINGS.
UM, THERE'S A LANDSCAPING OF A 10 FOOT BUFFER REQUIREMENT.
UM, WE WEREN'T ABLE TO MEET THAT 10 FOOT BUFFER ENTIRELY.
UM, SO THAT'S ONE OF THE VARIANTS, BUT WE WERE ABLE TO PROVIDE THAT SCREENING THROUGH THERE OF EVERGREEN PLANTS.
UM, AND THEN THE SECOND ITEM IS THE, UM, SQUARE FEET AREA REQUIREMENT FOR LANDSCAPING.
WE WEREN'T ABLE TO MEET THE TOTAL AREA BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY VERY MANY AREAS WHERE WE COULD ADD MORE LANDSCAPING, BUT WE WERE ABLE TO EXCEED THE NUM THE UNITS, UH, PLANT UNIT REQUIREMENT.
I'M GETTING MY CALCULATOR OUT.
[00:45:01]
SO DID I HEAR THAT RIGHT? THE, THE, THE VARIANCES STEM FROM MR. BRIAN, YOUR TEAM REQUIRING MORE PARKING, IS THAT RIGHT? I DON'T BELIEVE THAT'S CORRECT.YEAH, WE WOULD, THAT'S WHAT IT SOUNDED LIKE TO ME.
WE WOULD NEVER MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT YOU NEEDED MORE PARKING IF YEAH, IF THE, IF IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT MADE THAT RECOMMENDATION.
I DON'T BELIEVE THAT WOULD BE VERY WELL RECEIVED BY REALLY ANYONE THAT IN THIS ORGANIZATION.
YEAH, WE THAT'S WHAT, THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT I HEARD THOUGH.
I SAID THAT THERE MAKES SENSE.
I THINK WHAT SHE WAS REFERENCING IS THAT THERE'S EXTRA LANDSCAPING REQUIRED BECAUSE THEY EXCEEDED THE REQUIRED PARKING.
SO LET ME ASK A QUESTION FOR STAB.
WHEN WE, WHEN WE LOOK AT OUR ZONING AND OUR REQUIREMENTS AND ALL THAT, DO WE ALSO LOOK AT THE AREA THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT? BECAUSE, UM, THE BUILDINGS THAT THE, THAT THE, THAT THEY WOULD LIKE THEIR BUILDINGS TO GO TO.
THERE, THERE ARE AUTO REPAIR SHOPS, THERE ARE PLUMBING, THERE ARE ELECTRICAL SHOPS.
THERE'S A BIKE SHOP, THERE'S A OIL OIL CHANGE, THERE'S A SIGN SHOP.
AND THOSE ARE THE ONLY ONES I COULD JUST REMEMBER FROM JUST DRIVING BY THERE AT LEAST ALMOST MONTHLY.
UM, AND THERE'S, THERE'S, AND SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT, BECAUSE OF WHERE IT IS ON THIS CORNER, AND EVEN WHEN WE LOOK ON BROADWAY, THERE'S MINIMUM LANDSCAPING.
AND WHEN WE EVEN LOOK AT THE WHAT'S SOUTH OF THERE, THERE'S MINIMUM WITH OUR, THE CAJUN RESTAURANT, WITH THE STRIP MALL, WITH EVEN WITH, UH, THE NEW COFFEE SHOP THAT'S IN THERE.
SO DO WE LOOK AT THE, THE AREA THAT, THAT IT'S LIKE A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TYPE AREA? UM, SO WE, WE DO A COUPLE THINGS.
SO WE CONSIDER THE EXISTING ZONING.
SO, UH, IN THIS CASE IT'S, IT'S WHAT WE REFER TO AS MY RIGHT ZONING.
SO IT'S JUST ONE OF OUR LETTER DASH NUMBER DISTRICTS.
SO WE DON'T HAVE TO GO DIGGING INTO A PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT, MASTER DESIGN STATEMENT AND SEE IF THERE ARE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OR RESTRICTIONS OR THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.
UM, THEN WHEN WE, WHEN WE ARRIVE AT THE SITE PLAN STAGE, WE TRY TO LET EACH PROJECT STAND ON ITS OWN.
SO, UM, WE TRY NOT TO LET OURSELVES BE INFORMED BY, YOU KNOW, ACROSS THE STREET, MAYBE THERE WAS A VARIANCE GRANTED BECAUSE OF A SPECIFIC SITUATION TO THAT SITE.
WELL, YOU KNOW, THIS SITE MIGHT HAVE LESS CONSTRAINTS OR DIFFERENT CONSTRAINTS OR THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.
SO WE, WE DON'T ALWAYS LOOK AT IT THROUGH THE LENS, UM, OF LIKE, WHAT, WHAT'S AROUND IT, UM, IN, UNLESS IN TERMS OF LIKE, YOU KNOW, IF SOMEONE'S TRYING TO LIKE MATCH AN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, WE MIGHT, WE MIGHT DO THAT.
WE TRY NOT TO GET TOO INVOLVED IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND MATERIALS, BUT, UM, YEAH, FOR THE MOST PART, WE TRY TO GET EACH SITE TO STAND ON ITS OWN MERITS, FOLLOW THE STANDARDS, ADDRESS, UM, CONSTRAINTS IF THERE IS ODD LIKE INFILL OR, UM, THINGS LIKE THAT.
BECAUSE I MEAN, IN SOME SENSE IT MAKES IT EVEN MORE IMPORTANT THAT WE ABIDE BY THE STANDARDS TODAY WHEN WE HAVE OTHER PROJECTS IN THE AREA THAT DIDN'T HAVE THE SAME STANDARDS.
AND JUST BECAUSE THE COUNSEL 10 YEARS AGO APPROVED A VARIANCE SHOULDN'T MEAN THAT WE HAVE TO APPROVE A VARIANCE.
I MEAN, WE'RE TRYING TO BE CONSISTENT.
UM, DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE? YES.
SO COUNSEL, I'M, I'M, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO? I'M NOT GETTING INTO A DEBATE, BUT NO, I HEAR YOU.
UM, AND SO, WELL, AND I'M STRUGGLING HONESTLY, RIGHT? MM-HMM
UM, AND IT DOES SOMETIMES FEEL LIKE PLANNING COMMISSION IS QUICK TO GRANT VARIANCES AND THEN COMES TO US AND WE'VE GOT TO WRANGLE WITH IT.
RIGHT? UM, AND THAT I COULD TELL YOU, ME PERSONALLY, THAT'S WHY, WHY I'M IN FAVOR OF THIS IS THAT WHAT YOU SEE ON THIS, ON PAGE 3, 3, 2 OF YOUR PACKAGE, THAT CONCRETE AREA THERE, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.
IF YOU SEE SOMETHING GREEN, THAT MIGHT BE A PIECE OF
[00:50:02]
GREENERY THERE.BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPED AREA, UM, THERE, THERE, THERE IS NOTHING THERE.
THIS IS A, A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, SMALL SHOPS BUSINESS AREA WHERE, UH, THE BUSINESSES, I WAS TELLING YOU FROM THE, FROM THE AUTO REPAIR TO SIGNS TO, UH, THE NEWEST BUILDING DOWN THERE IS THE OIL CHANGE THAT'S AT THE VERY NORTH END WHERE YOU SEE THE HALF HOOK THERE.
EVERYTHING ELSE IS BEEN THERE FOR RIGHT.
AND I MEAN, AND MY TAKE ON THAT IS IT DOESN'T HAVE TO ALWAYS BE THAT WAY.
AND IF, YOU KNOW, AND IF THEY'RE, IF THE APPLICANT IS, IF MR. BRIAN AND HIS TEAM TELL THEM, YOU KNOW, THIS IS WHAT'S REQUIRED AND THEY WANT TO CONTINUE TO PRESS WITH A VARIANCE ON LANDSCAPING, THERE'S A RISK INVOLVED IN THAT THERE.
I MEAN, THERE'S NO SOUND REASON NOT IN MY JUDGMENT, THERE'S, THERE'S NOT A SOUND REASON TO GRANT THESE VARIANCES.
SO, AND, AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S TOO FAR DOWN THE ROAD, MR. MAYOR, FOR THE APPLICANT TO HIT PAUSE AND MAYBE COME BACK WITH ANOTHER LANDSCAPING PLAN OR IF THEY JUST WANT TO PRESS FORWARD TONIGHT.
BUT IF WE PRESS FORWARD TONIGHT, I'M VOTING NO.
COULD YOU SPEAK MORE ABOUT, UH, THE APPLICANT MENTIONED THE LIMITATIONS BECAUSE OF THE EASEMENTS.
UM, COULD YOU TALK MORE ABOUT THAT AND THE SPECIFIC LIMITATIONS THEY HAVE BECAUSE OF THE EASEMENTS ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE? YES.
UM, SO AS IT PERTAINS TO, UM, EASEMENTS, UM, WE, YOU DON'T, YOU, OUR CODE DOESN'T ALLOW YOU TO TAKE CREDIT FOR LANDSCAPING THAT'S CLOSE TO AN EASEMENT.
AND I DON'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHAT THE DISTANCE IS.
UM, AND THAT'S BECAUSE IT, THAT LANDSCAPE IS IN JEOPARDY IF THERE'S EVER RIGHT.
UTILITY WORK OR ROADWAY EXPANSION OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
SO WE, UM, YOU KNOW, WOULD, IT'D BE DIFFICULT TO COME BACK AFTER THE FACT AND ENFORCE THAT APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN WHEN IN FACT YOU CAN'T NOW ADD OR RESTORE THAT PLANT MATERIAL.
SO WHEN, WHEN THEY TALK ABOUT HAVING A CONSTRAINT RELATED TO AN EASEMENT, IT'S NOT JUST THE EASEMENT ITSELF.
THERE'S ACTUALLY A, A AREA OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT THAT THEY, THEY CAN PLANT THINGS THERE.
THEY JUST DON'T GET CREDIT FOR IT AS THEY GO THROUGH OUR PROCESS.
AND I THINK AS COUNCILWOMAN NICHOLS, I WAS WONDERING THE SAME THING.
I I'M JUST NOT FEELING CONFIDENT THAT THEY REALLY DID PUT IN AS MUCH LANDSCAPING AS COULD BE DONE.
UM, I HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING WITH THE EASEMENTS, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHERE DOES, WHERE DOES THE NOT COUNTING LINE, IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PUT ANY THERE? UM, AND THEN A CHOICE TO THAT THEY WANT MORE PARKING SPACES? I MEAN, I, I DON'T KNOW.
I JUST, TO ME IT ALMOST MAKES IT MORE IMPORTANT THAT WE ENFORCE THE, UM, STANDARDS AND RESTRICTIONS AND NOT GRANT VARIANCES ALL THE TIME WHEN WE'RE TRYING TO, AND WE'VE MADE CHANGES TO THE ORDINANCES AND WE'RE HOLDING PEOPLE TO THOSE.
AND THEN, YOU KNOW, WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF WE'RE CONSTANTLY JUST DOING VARIANCES? I MEAN, THIS IS A 57% REDUCTION VARIANCE, RIGHT? IF 10% IS REQUIRED, RIGHT? IT'S 40, UM, 4.3% IS WHAT THEY'RE DOING BASED ON THESE NUMBERS I'M SEEING.
SO I WOULD, I, I MEAN, I WOULD NEED MORE EVIDENCE THAT THIS IS REALLY THE BEST IT CAN BE AND IT'S AS CLOSE TO OUR REQUIRED AS POSSIBLE.
UM, SO I AGREE WITH WHAT COUNCILMAN MOORE SAID.
SO MR. O'BRIEN, I BELIEVE YOU SHOOK YOUR HEAD WHEN COUNCIL MEMBER MOORE ASKED IF THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO PAUSE.
AND TO NOT, OH, I, MAYBE I SHOULDN'T HAVE DONE THAT.
MORE TO THAT ACTUALLY WE NEED TO ASK THE APPLICANT, ARE THEY WILLING TO PAUSE AND, AND IT'S UP TO THEM IF THEY WANT TO PRESS FORWARD OR IT'S NOT STAFFED.
WE COULD RECOMMEND THAT THE TEA LEAVES ARE SAYING THAT WE WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND SEE WHAT, AND COME BACK WITH SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
[00:55:01]
ARE SAYING TONIGHT.BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO DO.
MR. MAYOR, SIR, REAL QUICK, MR. BRIAN, WHEN COULD THEY BE BACK AT CITY COUNCIL? WE'RE NOT TO, TO HOLD THEM UP.
COULD THEY BE BACK IN MARCH IF THEY AGREE TO PAUSE TONIGHT? AND YOU MEAN FEBRUARY OR FE FEBRUARY.
UM, I THINK OUR PREFERENCE IF THEY'RE GOING TO, UH, CONTINUE THIS TO ANOTHER MEETING WOULD BE THAT THEY TAKE A LOOK AT THEIR SITE, TAKE THOSE VARIANCES OUT OF THERE.
THEY DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK TO COUNCIL.
YEAH, IF THEY'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY VARIANCES, THEN WE DON'T NEED TO VOTE ON IT.
BUT, AND IF IT'S ABSOLUTELY VITAL, I WANT MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WHY YOU CAN'T PUT IT THERE.
IT'S KIND OF REMINDING ME ABOUT AC KAPLAN.
UM, AND IT WAS REALLY IMPORTANT TO MANY OF US THAT WE HOLD THE CITY TO THE SAME STANDARDS.
AND SO THAT'S WHAT I JUST KEEP THINKING IS, YOU KNOW, WHERE ARE THE LINES? WHERE CAN YOU NOT DO IT? HAVE WE PUT IN AS MUCH LANDSCAPING AS WE POSSIBLY CAN? UM, YOU KNOW, OR, AND MAKING SURE IF WE'RE TRADING OFF PARKING SPACES FOR LANDSCAPING, UM, OR VICE VERSA THAT IT'S REALLY WORTH THAT TRADE OFF.
UM, UM, YEAH, I, LIKE I MENTIONED, WE, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING VERY CLOSELY WITH AVA, UM, CONSTANTLY MEETING WITH HER ON TRYING TO, WITH WHO? UH, AVA, SHE'S WITH THE, SHE'S THE WOOD REVIEWING FOR LANDSCAPING WITH THE CITY.
YEAH, I'M, SO, I'M HAVING TROUBLE HEARING, THAT'S ALL.
UM, YEAH, SO WE, UM, WE'VE BEEN WORKING REALLY DILIGENTLY WITH HER THROUGH THIS PROCESS.
WE WEREN'T GOING INTO THIS WANTING TO SEEK A VARIANCE FROM THE BEGINNING.
UM, I WILL SAY THAT, UH, YOU CAN KIND OF SEE UNDER THERE, WE DO HAVE UNDERGROUND DETENTION IN THE PARKING LOT AREA.
UM, AND I THINK THAT AT THIS STAGE WE, THERE'S NOTHING, NOWHERE ELSE WE CAN ADD MORE LANDSCAPING, UM, ON THE SITE.
LIKE I SAID, WE HAVE CIRCULATE, UM, EXCUSE ME, EXCUSE ME.
SO WE HAVE THE CIRCULATION REQUIREMENTS THROUGH HERE FOR FIRE TO FIT THROUGH THERE.
UM, AND THEN WE HAVE, LIKE I SAID, THE VEHICLE CIRCULATION REQUIREMENT THROUGH HERE FOR CARS TO THE VEHICLE, WHAT THE VEHICLE CIRCULATION THROUGH HERE FOR CARS TO WALK, COME THROUGH HERE.
SO WE, WE COULDN'T ADD MORE LANDSCAPING ALONG HERE.
WE COULD NOT ADD MORE LANDSCAPING UP THERE.
THE ONLY, THE ONLY WAY TO ADD MORE LANDSCAPING HERE IS TO PUSH THIS FORWARD, WHICH WE CAN'T BECAUSE OF THE PARKING, UM, REQUIREMENT DISTANCE AND FOR FIRE ACCESS THROUGH HERE.
AND THEN ALSO THERE'S UNDERGROUND DETENTION THAT WE HAVE HAPPENING IN THIS AREA.
SO I, I REALLY, UM, YOU KNOW, IT, I REALLY, WE REALLY ARE TRYING TO WORK WITH THE CITY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.
UM, I JUST DON'T SEE WHAT BETTER SOLUTION WE ARE GONNA BE ABLE TO COME BACK WITH AT THIS STAGE.
UM, THE ONLY THING I CAN THINK OF WOULD BE TO, UM, CHANGE THE BUILDING ENTIRELY AND MAKE IT SMALLER.
OR COULD THEY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES? UM, I DON'T THINK WE CAN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES.
I, I AM SORRY IF I MISSPOKE EARLIER.
UM, I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER 'CAUSE THIS HAS BEEN A WHILE, BUT, UM, I THINK WE HAD A CERTAIN NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AT FIRST.
UM, THEN WE CAME BACK AND BECAUSE OF THE ZONING, UH, REALIZED THAT, UM, BECAUSE THERE WERE, THERE WAS GONNA BE OFFICE BUILDINGS IN THE FRONT, WE NEEDED TO ADD MORE PARKING.
UM, THIS IS ZONED E TWO I BELIEVE, SO IT'S LIKE A COMMERCIAL, UM, DISPLAY COMMERCIAL.
SO WE HAD TO COME BACK AND ADD MORE PARKING SO WE WE'RE NOT JUST HAVING EXTRA PARKING SPOT THAT COULD BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING ON THERE.
I'M, WE'RE GETTING CONFLICTED INFORMATION.
UM, THEY, I DON'T KNOW THAT I COULD COME BACK WITH SOMETHING BETTER THAN THIS OTHER THAN SHRINKING THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING GIVEN THE SITE CONSTRAINTS.
I THINK I JUST HEARD AGAIN THAT YOU HAD TO ADD PARKING SPACES, RIGHT? WHY? UM, THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER, SIR.
UM, I THINK IT HAD TO DO WITH A MISUNDERSTANDING ON OUR SIDE WITH THE AMOUNT OF PARKING THAT WAS REQUIRED BASED ON THE ZONING REQUIRE, UH, REQUIREMENT ON THE SITE.
SO WE CAME BACK AND REALIZED, OH, WE, WE NEED MORE PARKING.
SO WE ADDED MORE PARKING TO THAT.
SO WHERE THE DISCONNECT IS, IS ARE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPOTS REQUIRED FOR THIS ZONING OR THIS SIZE OF BUILDING, OR DOES THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING FEEL LIKE THEY NEED MORE PARKING SPOTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THEY'RE GONNA, THAT ARE GONNA BE PARKING THERE? RIGHT? NO,
[01:00:01]
WE, WE, WE HAVE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPOTS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THE ZONING.SO IF, IF WE COULD REMOVE PARKING AND ADD MORE LANDSCAPING, WE WOULD'VE DONE THAT.
THAT SOUNDS INCONSISTENT WITH WHAT MR. BRIAN WAS SAYING EARLIER.
BUT YEAH, SO FIRST OF ALL, TO BE CLEAR, OUR PARKING STANDARDS ARE MAXIMUMS. SO, UM, OR WE TREAT THEM AS MAXIMUM.
SO IF YOU COME IN AND SAY, WANNA PUT HOWEVER MANY PARKING SPACES IT IS, WE TEND TO, UM, GO WITH YOUR, YOU KNOW, GO WITH YOUR GUT TRUST, THE, THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS TO PROVIDE THE PARKING THAT THEY, UM, THAT, THAT MEETS THEIR NEEDS OF THEIR FACILITY.
UM, SO I DOUBT THERE WAS A CONVERSATION WITH STAFF THAT THIS APPLICANT TO ADD MORE PARKING.
SO, AND IT, IT ALSO SEEMED LIKE WE'RE DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO SAYING THAT THE STAFF LANDSCAPE REVIEWER HAS SOMEHOW SANCTIONED THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT WE'RE SEEING THAT IS ALSO NOT TRUE.
I DON'T THINK ANYTHING LIKE THAT WAS SAID.
THAT'S, I I ASK A QUESTION IF THE, IF THE NO.
OH, I, I HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING ABOUT THE APPLICANT WAS SAYING THEY'VE BEEN WORKING CLOSELY WITH CITY STAFF TO, I DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT SHE WAS SAYING.
I'M SORRY IF I MISSPOKEN GETTING A LITTLE BIT NERVOUS HERE.
UM, BUT NO, I DON'T THINK THAT I, I'M SAYING THAT WITH THE SAME, I'M JUST SAYING THAT WE'RE NOT COMING INTO THE PROJECT TRYING TO BEND CITY REQUIREMENTS OR RULES.
UM, BUT WHEN WE REALIZED OUR CONSTRAINTS, WE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH THE CITY TO TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT ARE, UM, YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE THE THINGS THAT WE'RE NOT MEETING THAT WE NEED TO MEET.
AND THEN, YOU KNOW, THAT'S KIND OF WHERE, WHERE WE ARE.
SO IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE THE CITY IS TRYING TO BEND ANYTHING.
I'M JUST SAYING THAT WE HAVE WORKED WITH DILIGENTLY SO WE CAN TRY TO MEET ALL THE CITY REQUIREMENTS.
HOW ABOUT THIS? WHAT IF, IF IT'S NOT A TIME CONSTRAINT WITH YOU ALL, WHY DON'T YOU COME BACK IN TWO WEEKS, FOUR WEEKS, BUT HAVE A A I WOULD LIKE FOR A CAMPFIRE BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND STAFF.
STAFF HAS HEARD SOME OF THE QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS THAT THEY'VE HAD ABOUT FROM PARKING AND ALL THAT.
LET'S GO DOWN THE CHECKLIST AND SAY THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE PARKING IS MAKE SURE EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS BECAUSE WE DON'T NEED TO BE TRYING TO, UP HERE AT THE DI IS TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT IS THE ACTUAL REQUIREMENT.
THERE'S NOT, WHAT I'M HEARING, THERE'S NOT A MINIMUM.
WE'RE NOT BUTTING UP AGAINST THE MAXIMUM FOR PARKING SPACES.
BUT WHAT I, WHAT I'M, THEY'VE EXCEEDED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWS CODE BECAUSE THERE'S 12 PARKING SPACES.
THAT'S WHAT, THAT'S WHAT I TOOK OFF THEIR PLANS.
THAT'S WHAT THEY SAID ON THEIR PLANS.
THEY PROVIDED THAT THEY WERE REQUIRED TO HAVE NINE, THEY'RE PROVIDING 12.
THAT REQUIRES MORE LANDSCAPING WHEN YOU DO THAT.
SO IT ALSO TAKES UP SOME REAL ESTATE THAT COULD BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING.
BUT WHAT I'M ASKING FOR IS THAT IF THE APPLICANT'S AMENABLE TO THAT IS TO COME BACK, HAVE THE, HAVE THE CAMPFIRE SESSION WITH STAFF TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY'S ON THE SAME SHEET OF MUSIC, ABOUT MAXIMUM MINIMUM OF PARKING, LANDSCAPING, GET ALL THAT SQUARED AWAY AND THEN COME BACK.
UH, I THINK THAT WOULD BE MORE FAVORABLE FOR THE APPLICANT, UM, IF THAT WAS CLARIFIED EXACTLY WHAT IS REQUIRED BEFORE A DECISION IS MADE UP HERE, BECAUSE THAT MAY NOT BE A FAVORABLE DECISION FOR THE APPLICANT.
WELL, AND THERE MAY BE THE APPLICANT NEEDS TO RE-LOOK AT THEIR PLAN TO SEE IF THERE'S A WAY THAT THEY CAN DO THIS WITHOUT AS LARGE OF A VARIANCE.
I'M NOT CONVINCED OF THAT YET.
WELL, MR. MAYOR, I'D MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM.
FEBRUARY 10TH TO FEBRUARY 10 OR OR FEBRUARY 10TH MEETING.
I WAS GONNA ASK THE APPLICANT IS, YOU'RE FINE WITH THAT, THAT WE, THAT YOU COME BACK IN TWO WEEKS AFTER THE CAMPFIRE WITH STAFF? YEAH.
WE'D LOVE TO MEET AND SEE WHERE WE WENT ALONG THERE, MR. PERFECT.
THAT'S A PRETTY TIGHT DEADLINE, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.
AREN'T ITEMS DUE WEDNESDAY AT THEON FOR THAT? YEAH.
HOW ABOUT FEBRUARY 24TH? I MOVE FEBRUARY 24TH TO CONTINUE THIS TO FEBRUARY 24TH.
[01:05:01]
YOU HAVE A SECOND.ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL MY ONLY POINT IS, IS I DON'T KNOW THAT IT'S UP TO STAFF TO SOLVE THIS FOR THEM.
I'M ASKING FOR STAFF AND THE APPLICANT TO GET TOGETHER TO, TO TALK TOGETHER.
WHAT I'VE HEARD TODAY WAS SOME CONFUSION AND TO ME, IT'S NOT OUR JOB OR PLACE TO, TO, THAT'S WHAT STAFF AND THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE SITTING DOWN AND HAVING THIS CAMPFIRE NIGHT DISCUSSION THAT WE'RE HAVING HERE TONIGHT.
THEY SHOULD BE HAVING THAT TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY COMPLETELY UNDERSTANDS WHEN THEY COME UP HERE.
I'M HEARING CONFUSION ON BOTH SIDES.
I'M HEARING QUESTIONS FROM BOTH SIDES.
SO WE HAVE A MOTION FEBRUARY 24TH, 24TH, MAY 2ND AND AND A SECOND.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
AS MAY CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 24TH.
NEXT IS ITEM 10 C, CASE NUMBER Z 24 DASH 0 0 21.
[C. Case No. Z24-00021; Public Hearing and Consideration of Ordinance No. ___ Rezoning from “B PUD” Two-Family Planned Unit Development and “A” Single-Family to “PUD” Planned Unit Development for Lincoln Avenue Residential, Located Northwest of Jackson Street and Lincoln Avenue. (Wallace Design; Ward 1)]
CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 4,022 4,022, REZONING FROM A-B-P-U-D TWO FAMILY PLAN.PLAN, UH, TWO FAMILY PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND A, A SINGLE FAMILY TO A P PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR LINCOLN AVENUE RESIDENTIAL, LOCATED NORTHWEST OF JACKSON STREET AND LINCOLN AVENUE.
WALLACE DESIGN IS THE APPLICANT.
SO WE CAN SEE THE SITE LOCATED HERE NORTHWEST OF JACKSON AND LINCOLN.
THE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 1.08 ACRES.
THE SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED BPUD AND A SINGLE FAMILY NORTH OF THE SITE IS ZONED BPUD.
AND IT IS DEVELOPED AS THE BRADFORD VILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING COMPLEX.
EAST IS ZONED C TWO AND DEVELOPED AS SINGLE FAMILY SOUTH IS ZONED A, DEVELOPED AS SINGLE FAMILY TO THE WEST IS ZONED A AND B, WHICH ARE BOTH VACANT AND DEVELOPED AS A DUPLEX.
UH, THE PURPOSE OF THIS ZONING MAP AMENDMENT REQUEST IS TO ADJUST THE SETBACKS AND ALLOW, UH, LOTS TO BE CREATED THAT ARE SMALLER THAN, UM, IN THE BY RIGHT DISTRICT.
AS PART OF A FUTURE DEED CERTIFICATION, THE OWNER WILL NEED TO DEDICATE A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THE EXISTING FLU BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH STRUCTURES.
UH, THE EDMUND PLAN 2018 CATEGORIZES THE SITE AS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE EXISTING USE IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS CATEGORY AT THE REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 7TH, 2025.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BY VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
COUNSEL, ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? FOR, I I WAS A LITTLE CONFUSED IN THAT IT, IT SAID THEY'RE NOT INCREASING THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS, BUT THEN POTENTIALLY THEY COULD IN THE FUTURE IF THEY TORE EVERYTHING DOWN.
SO I WAS, I WAS, I AM CONFUSED.
UM, I THINK THE APPLICANT MIGHT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THEY, UH, THEY WOULD LIKE TO DIVIDE THIS UP INTO SEPARATE LOTS FOR, UH, TO BE ABLE TO, TO SELL THOSE.
UM, THEY ALSO RECOGNIZE PERHAPS IF THAT PLAN DOESN'T GO FORWARD, THEY, UH, THEY WANTED THE ABILITY TO DO, AS YOU'RE SUGGESTING AND INCREASE THE, UM, NUMBER OF UNITS ON THE SIDE BY DOING SOME REDEVELOPMENT OR INFILL BECAUSE I, I JUST FOUND IT TO BE A LITTLE BIT MISLEADING TO SAY THEY'RE NOT INCREASING THE NUMBER, BUT YET IF WE APPROVE THE ZONING THEY COULD.
UM, AND BY HOW MUCH, I GUESS THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
SO IN OTHER WORDS, IF THEY WERE TO RAISE THE SITE THAT THE ZONING WAS APPROVED, THEY RAISED THE SITE, HOW MANY POTENTIAL UNITS COULD THEY CONSTRUCT? IS THAT THE BASICALLY QUESTION? OKAY.
WOULD THAT WE CAN HAVE THE APPLICANT COME UP AND START MM-HMM
PERVY PATEL WITH WALLACE DESIGN COLLECTIVE, CURRENTLY THERE ARE 10 UNITS ON THE SITE AS IT STANDS.
AND THE PUD IS WRITTEN THAT THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS, EVEN IN THE FUTURE WOULD BE 10 UNITS.
SO WE WOULD NOT BE INCREASING THE NUMBER OF UNITS THERE
[01:10:01]
IF FOR WHATEVER REASON THE SITE WAS RAISED.CURRENTLY, WE AREN'T PROPOSING ANY PHYSICAL CHANGES TO THE SITE FOR FINANCIAL PURPOSES ONLY.
WE'RE WANTING TO ADD A COUPLE OF LOT LINES TO HELP WITH THE FINANCIAL, UM, GOAL THAT THE OWNER HAS.
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? SO THIS IS ONE LOT CURRENTLY AND WE'VE GOT FOUR DUPLEX UNITS AND TWO SINGLE FAMILY UNITS.
SO THE PUD IS TO ALLOW TO COME IN AND DO A LOT LINE BETWEEN THE, SO THERE'D BE TWO DUPLEX UNITS ON EACH LOT AND THEN A TWO SINGLE FAMILY.
AND THAT'S JUST THE WAY THE BANKS FINANCE THESE UNITS.
MULTI-FAMILY VERSUS DIFFERENT BANK LOAN TYPES.
SO THE PUD IS JUST TO ALLOW FOR US TO COME BACK IN THE FUTURE WITH A PLA THAT WOULD CREATE THREE LOTS AND, UM, ALLOW THE FINANCING TO GO THROUGH AS THE OWNER WISHES.
AND THE PUD IS WRITTEN FOR THE ENTIRE BOUNDARY.
SO EVEN IN THE FUTURE, IF WE HAD THE THREE LOTS, THE TOTAL AREA WOULD STILL ONLY ALLOW 10 LOTS OR 10 BUILDING 10 UNITS IF ANYTHING WERE TO HAPPEN.
BUT EACH UNIT IT COULD BE MORE THAN A DUPLEX 10 UNITS TOTAL.
SO IT COULD BE A DIFFERENT COMBINATION OF BUILDINGS.
BUT 10 UNITS IS THEIR MAX IS THE WAY IT'S WRITTEN.
BUT THAT THEY COULD SELL IT OFF AND, AND DEVELOP 'EM INDIVIDUALLY? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? THERE IS NO PLANS TO DEVELOP THIS IS AS IT IS RIGHT NOW.
WE JUST WANNA ADD THE LOT LINES FOR FINANCIAL REASONS.
YEAH, I'M JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE, EVEN THOUGH THEY DON'T HAVE IMMEDIATE PLANS TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAT WE'RE NOT APPROVING SOMETHING THAT WOULD ALLOW, YOU KNOW, A LOT MORE UNITS OR, UH, WHAT HAVE YOU.
AND THAT, THAT'S THE MAX THAT'S ALLOWED, CORRECT.
SO THE PUD AREA IS 1.08 ACRES, AND SO WITHIN THAT 1.08, NO MORE THAN 10 UNITS WOULD BE ALLOWED IN THE FUTURE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW FOR THE APPLICANT? THE APPLICANT LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING ELSE? NO, SIR.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COUNSEL? NO, I'M JUST TRYING TO FIND WHY I WAS CONFUSED, BUT, OKAY.
ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON THIS ITEM? COUNSEL, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO ON THIS ITEM? THEN? THERE'S, UH, ITEM 10 C.
SO MR. BRIAN, DO YOU AGREE THAT THEY CAN'T HAVE MORE THAN 10 UNITS ON THE THREE TRACKS IF IT'S DIVIDED INTO THREE TRACKS? YES.
THE, THE BE THE, SO THE DESIGN STATEMENT THAT THE APPLICANT IS REFERENCING, UM, CLARIFIES THE ACREAGE AT THE 1.08.
UM, THE ALLOWABLE LAND USES AND SPECIFIES THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS ON THAT 1.08 ACRES AT 10.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT ITEM, MS. PASS.
THE NEXT IS ITEM FOUR D ONE CONSIDERATION, APPROVAL OF
[D. Citizen TIF Oversight Committee:]
RESOLUTION NUMBER SEVEN DASH 25 7 DASH 25 REPEALING SECTION TWO THROUGH SECTION SEVEN OF RESOLUTION NUMBER 10 DASH 24 WITH THE INTENT TO DISSOLVE THE CITIZEN'S TIFF OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AND REESTABLISH THE SAME BY ORDINANCE NOMINATING COM.UH, CURRENT MEMBERS FOR THE CITIZENS TIP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AS REESTABLISHED AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
UH, I'M HAPPY TO COMMENT ON THAT.
AND YOU'RE PROBABLY AWARE WE'VE DONE THIS WITH SEVERAL OF OUR, UH, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS THAT WERE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION.
WE'RE BRINGING THEM BACK THROUGH TO ESTABLISH THEM BY ORDINANCE.
UH, THERE'S NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO THE ROLE OF THE CITIZEN'S TIFF OVERSIGHT.
IT'S REPEALING THE RESOLUTION.
AND THEN THE NEXT ITEM WILL ESTABLISH THE ORDINANCE.
SO THIS IS, UM, D ONE IS REPEALING AND D TWO WILL BE ESTABLISHING.
COUNSEL, ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE? COUNSEL, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO ON ITEM 10? D ONE? YOU WANT A MOTION ON ONE OR TWO OF THESE? MAYOR AT TIME? WELL JUST TAKE 'EM ONE AT A TIME.
[01:15:01]
APPROVE ITEM 10 D.ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
10 10 D TWO IS PUBLIC HEARING.
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 4,023.
4,023 AMENDING TITLE TWO ADMINISTRATION AND PURCHASE NOW OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ENACTING A NEW CHAPTER 2.0 2.600 CITIZEN TIFF OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL AND SEVERABILITY AND DECLARING A EMERGENCY.
SO COUNSEL, THIS IS JUST ESTABLISHING WHERE WE JUST DISSOLVED.
AND, UH, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE? COUNSEL, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO? I MOVE TO APPROVE A SECOND.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
AND NOW WE NEED MR. I MAKE A MOTION FOR THE EMERGENCY, PLEASE.
WE HAVE A MOTION ON EMERGENCY.
NOW WE NEED A MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND SALARY ADJUSTMENT
[11. Executive Sessions and Action Items:]
AS AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO 25 OS.SECTION 3 0 7 BB ONE TO MOVE MOTION.
SO WHAT WE GOTTA DO, NEED A MOTION TO COME OUTTA EXECUTIVE SESSION.
ARE WE NOW AT THE EXECUTIVE SESSION? MR. MAYOR, I HAVE A MOTION I MOVE TO APPOINT RANDY ENTZ, INTERIM CITY MANAGER AT PAY GRADE 35, STEP SIX.
[12. City Manager Search:]
ITEM 12, WHICH IS CITY MANAGER SEARCH, DISCUSSION, PRESENTATION, AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING POTENTIAL OPTIONS, PROCESSES, AND TIMELINES FOR THE HIRING AND APPOINTMENT OF A PERMANENT CITY MANAGER.YOUR HONOR, GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
CAROLINE PIERCE, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES AT THE CITY OF EDMOND.
UM, WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT TO YOU TONIGHT IS A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY, UM, SOME PROS AND CONS, THINGS LIKE THAT RELATED TO EXECUTIVE SEARCHES AND HOW WE'VE GONE ABOUT TO DO THAT.
UM, AND BY ALL MEANS, ANYTIME YOU HAVE A QUESTION, FEEL FREE TO CHIME IN.
SO WHAT I PUT TOGETHER FROM WHAT I COULD FIND IN THE FILES IS A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY OF WHAT WE'VE DONE IN THE PAST TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION.
WHEN I SAY AN EXECUTIVE POSITION, I MEAN SOMEONE WHO'S OF A DEPARTMENT HEAD TYPE STATUS, UM, A POSITION THAT'S OUT OUTSIDE OF WHAT YOU WOULD JUST NORMALLY GO ONLINE AND APPLY FOR.
AND, AND I WOULD SAY IN THE CASES WE'VE DONE BOTH, WE'VE USED AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM AND WE HAVE NOT.
I THINK A LOT OF IT DEPENDED ON THE POSITION AND SOME OF THE FACTORS THAT I'LL REVIEW WITH YOU REGARDING WHETHER YOU WANNA USE AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM OR NOT.
SO IN EVALUATING THE POSITION, YOU WANNA THINK ABOUT, UM, A FEW KEY FACTORS AS TO WHETHER, YOU KNOW, YOU THINK THAT YOU CAN FILL IT INTERNALLY WITH STAFF OR IF YOU FEEL LIKE YOU NEED AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM TO BRING SOME OF THEIR BENEFITS, SOME OF WHAT THEY DO.
BUT FIRST THING YOU WANNA DO IS LOOK AT THE POSITION, KIND OF THINK OF THE CANDIDATE POOL FOR THAT POSITION.
AND FOR A POSITION SUCH AS A CITY MANAGER, I WOULD SAY YOU'RE GONNA HAVE A LARGE A, A SMALLER CANDIDATE POOL BECAUSE IT'S A MORE SPECIFIC POSITION AS OPPOSED TO, LET'S SAY A FINANCE DIRECTOR.
UM, NOTHING AGAINST KATHY, BUT UM, THERE'S PROBABLY MORE FINANCE PEOPLE OUT THERE AS OPPOSED TO SOMEONE WHO'S GOT A MASTER'S DEGREE IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION.
SO YOU WANNA THINK ABOUT WHERE YOUR POOL IS COMING FROM.
UM, IF YOU HAVE LOCAL CANDIDATES THAT ARE QUALIFIED OR SOMEONE WHO'S INTERNAL THAT'S QUALIFIED THAT YOU HAVE AN IDEA MIGHT BE A GOOD CANDIDATE FOR THE POSITION THAT MIGHT COME INTO PLAY AS WELL.
[01:20:01]
DO YOU WANNA DO A LOCAL SEARCH? STATEWIDE, REGIONAL, NATIONAL? WHERE DO YOU WANT YOUR CANDIDATES TO COME FROM? HOW MUCH INVOLVEMENT DO YOU WANT FROM THE COMMUNITY? 'CAUSE YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THEIR SCHEDULES, THEIR INVOLVEMENT, THEIR INPUT.THERE'S DIFFERENT WAYS TO DO IT EITHER WITH OR WITHOUT AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM, BUT YOU WANNA KEEP THAT IN MIND.
BACKGROUND SEARCHES, DETAILS, MEDIA SEARCHES.
AGAIN, YOU WANNA THINK ABOUT THE POSITION AND HOW IN DEPTH YOU WANNA GO INTO A BACKGROUND OF THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE APPLYING FOR THAT POSITION.
UM, USUALLY WHETHER YOU'RE DOING IT THROUGH A SEARCH, YOU KNOW, THROUGH A EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM OR IN-HOUSE, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD OUTSOURCE TO DO A THOROUGH BACKGROUND SEARCH ON, ON THE CANDIDATE.
AND THEN TIME AND RESOURCES ALWAYS COMES INTO PLAY.
WHAT'S YOUR TIMELINE? WHAT'S YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS? WHEN DO YOU WANT THIS POSITION FILLED AND SOMEONE UP AND RUNNING INTO POSITION COST ASSOCIATED WITH FILLING AN EXECUTIVE POSITION? THERE'S ALWAYS GONNA BE COST, WHETHER YOU USE A SEARCH FIRM OR WHETHER YOU DO IT INTERNALLY.
UM, OBVIOUSLY A BIG COST IS GONNA BE YOUR CONTRACT FOR AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM.
UM, BUT YOU'RE ALWAYS GONNA HAVE COST OF A BROCHURE THAT YOU PUT TOGETHER WITH EITHER YOUR MARKETING DEPARTMENT OR THROUGH THAT SEARCH FIRM.
WHERE DO YOU WANT TO PLACE AN ADVERTISEMENT? UH, FOR EXAMPLE, WITH A CITY MANAGER POSITION, OBVIOUSLY YOU'RE GONNA GO THROUGH THE OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, YOU'RE GONNA GO THROUGH THE INNER CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, UM, THOSE TYPE OF RESOURCES.
AND THEY'RE ALL GONNA COST MONEY.
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD, THAT'S GONNA BE BASICALLY YOUR STAFF'S TIMELINE.
WHAT THEY PUT INTO THE TIME THAT IT TAKES TO VET APPLICATIONS, PUT TOGETHER ADVERTISING, JUST KIND OF LOOK AT THE FLOW OF THE PROCESS OR IS IT SOMETHING YOU WANT AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM TO TAKE CARE OF? BACKGROUNDS, MEDIA SEARCHES, BASICALLY ONSITE INTERVIEWS.
THESE ARE ALL THINGS THAT ARE GONNA HAPPEN AND THESE ARE ALL GONNA BE COST TYPE ITEMS. UH, RELOCATION OF A CANDIDATE IF THEY HAVE TO MOVE HERE, WE ABSORB THOSE COSTS AND IF THEY HAVE TEMPORARY HOUSING NEEDS, MEANING THEY'VE GOTTA SELL THEIR HOUSE ON THEIR END, BUY A HOUSE ON THIS END, WE HELP FUND THOSE COST AS WELL.
SOME EXAMPLES OF THE TIME THAT IT TOOK IN THE PAST TO FILL A VACANCY FOR AN EXECUTIVE POSITION, UM, WHAT I WENT OFF OF WAS WHAT I COULD FIND IN THE FILES AS FAR AS WHEN THAT VACANCY OCCURRED TO THE TIME THAT IT WAS ACTUALLY FILLED BY CANDIDATE.
AND WHAT I TRIED TO DO IS PICK A LITTLE BIT FROM THE TIMEFRAME OF WHAT IT WAS WITH AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM AND WHAT WE DID INTERNALLY WITHOUT A SEARCH FIRM.
AND AS YOU CAN KIND OF SEE IT VARIES.
UM, IT JUST DEPENDS ON DIFFERENT FACTORS.
BUT THAT WAS TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF A REALISTIC TIMEFRAME TO FILL A VACANCY.
DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING WAS PROBABLY THE QUICKEST.
UM, BUT WE HAD THE, UM, FORTUNATE, YOU KNOW, EXPERIENCE OF STEVE LAWRENCE WHO STEPPED INTO THAT ROLE.
UM, TO KIND OF GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHERE WE'RE AT WITH THE FIRE CHIEF EXECUTIVE SEARCH RIGHT NOW, UM, WE ARE USING A FIRM STRATEGIC GOVERNMENT RESOURCES.
AND WHEN WE SIGN THAT CONTRACT WITH THEM, THEY GAVE US KIND OF A TIMELINE OF WHAT THIS OUTLINE IS.
AS YOU CAN KIND OF SEE, UM, WHAT THEY ESTIMATE IS A 12 TO 13 WEEK PROCESS FROM BEGINNING TO END.
UM, I WILL TELL YOU CURRENTLY WE ARE BEHIND IN THAT PROCESS, MEANING IT HAS TAKEN LONGER TO GET A CONTRACT SIGNED.
IT TOOK LONGER TO GET A BROCHURE DESIGNED TO GET IT ADVERTISED, BUT WHERE WE ARE AT RIGHT NOW IS WE DID GET THAT POSITION POSTED AND ADVERTISED ON JANUARY 21ST.
AND SO THEY'VE REVAMPED THE TIMELINE TO START INTERVIEWS ON APRIL 15TH.
SO THAT ALSO GIVES YOU KIND OF AN IDEA OF WHAT A CALENDAR LOOKS LIKE WHEN YOU'RE FILLING AN EXECUTIVE POSITION, SOME INTERRUPTIONS THAT HAPPEN WHEN YOU'RE FILLING ANY POSITION, WHETHER IT'S EXECUTIVE OR NOT.
UM, LIKE I SAID, IT TOOK US THREE TIMES TO GET THIS BROCHURE DRAFTED.
WE KEPT GOING BACK AND FORTH WITH LITTLE TWEAKS AND UH, FINALLY GOT IT DONE.
UM, EVEN THOUGH WE HAD A BASELINE TO ALREADY PUT THAT BROCHURE ON.
BUT THERE'S UPDATES THAT YOU HAVE TO DO WITH IT.
YOU HAVE TO DO NUMBERS, BUDGET NUMBERS, UH, PENSION NUMBERS, THOSE TYPE OF THINGS, CALENDAR DELAYS, I WOULD SAY WITH THE FIRE CHIEF CALENDAR DELAYS WOULD BE YOUR HOLIDAYS.
UM, THOSE WHAT CAME INTO PLAY AS FAR AS THE DELAY QUESTIONS FROM AM APPLICANTS.
ONCE YOU DO ADVERTISE, SOMETIMES YOU GET QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE TO GO RESEARCH OR YOU HAVE TO SOURCE FROM STAFF AND SAY, WHAT HAVE WE DONE IN THE PAST? UM, WHAT'S THE POLICY ON THIS? FOR EXAMPLE, WITH THE FIRE SEARCH, WE HAD TO GO AND TALK TO THE PENSION, STATE
[01:25:01]
PENSION BOARD TO GET SOME INFORMATION TO ANSWER SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME IN FROM THE APPLICANTS SCHEDULING CONFLICTS, NEGOTIATION TIMEFRAMES, AND THEN YOU CAN ALWAYS HAVE AN APPLICANT WITHDRAW.IT HAPPENS SOME OF THE BENEFITS OF UTILIZING A SEARCH FIRM, WELL, THEY ARE THE EXPERTS IN THE FIELD, THAT'S WHAT THEY DO FOR A LIVING.
SO IF YOU WANT TO RELY ON THEIR EXPERTISE, SOMETIMES IT'S BETTER TO GET AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM.
IF YOU WANT ACCESS TO A LARGER MARKET CANDIDATES, IF YOU WANT YOUR TIME TO BE VERY STRUCTURED OR MORE STRUCTURED, UM, THAT'S A GOOD TIME TO USE A SEARCH FIRM CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE PROCESS OF THE APPLICANTS.
WHAT I MEAN BY THIS IS THAT EVERYTHING IS JUST KIND OF TAKEN OUT OF THE HANDS OF THE CITY WHEN YOU HAVE CITY STAFF INVOLVED.
THEY'RE CONFIDENTIAL TOO, BUT THERE'S MORE ERROR FOR A LEAK OR GOSSIP OR SOMETHING GETTING OUT RATHER THAN IT BEING TOTALLY CONFIDENTIAL.
UM, A LITTLE BIT MORE THOROUGH SCREENING PROCESS.
BUT AGAIN, THIS CAN BE OUTSOURCED IF YOU DO IT WITHOUT AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM.
BUT THEY'RE THE EXPERTS IN THAT AND THEY HAVE THE RESOURCES TO DO IT.
AND THEN OF COURSE THERE'S REDUCED ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COST.
ON THE FLIP SIDE OF THAT, SOME OF THE BENEFITS OF NOT USING A SEARCH FIRM, OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A COST SAVINGS.
UM, YOU'RE STILL GONNA HAVE COST, BUT IT'S NOT GONNA BE AS LARGE BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT DOING THAT LUMP SUM PAYMENT TO AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM.
UM, WHEN THERE IS A SMALLER MARKET SEARCH THAT'S APPROPRIATE, MEANING, YOU KNOW THAT YOU HAVE CANDIDATES IN THE LOCAL AREA OR DEPENDING ON THE POSITION, YOU MAY NOT NEED A SEARCH FIRM.
UM, WE WOULD HAVE FULL CONTROL OVER THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS, MEANING WE CONTROL THE GUIDELINES.
UM, YOU CAN CHANGE THE PROCESS MIDSTREAM WITHOUT IT COSTING YOU THINGS.
THAT'S WHAT I MEAN BY THAT LINE.
UM, IF YOU KNOW THAT THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO PROMOTE WITHIN OR YOU ALREADY HAVE A SUCCESSION PLAN IN PLACE FOR THAT POSITION, IT'S A GOOD TIME NOT TO USE AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM.
AND THEN AGAIN, JUST THE FLEXIBILITY WHERE YOU CAN CHANGE MIDSTREAM, YOU CAN PUT THINGS ON HOLD, YOU CAN SPEED THEM UP.
THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER BENEFIT.
ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT? SO WHAT WOULD YOU ESTIMATE THE COST WOULD BE FOR A SEARCH FIRM? UM, I KNOW THREE OF US WERE INVOLVED IN THAT IN 2021, BUT I HONESTLY DON'T REMEMBER WHAT THE COST OF THIS MM-HMM
SO THAT SEARCH FIRM, UM, WITH MERCER, I BELIEVE IT WAS, IT WAS 23 5.
AND THE CURRENT SEARCH FIRM THAT WE ARE UTILIZING FOR THE FIRE CHIEF IS A LITTLE OVER 27,000.
I'VE SEEN BIDS COME ANYWHERE FROM, I WOULD SAY 25 ALL THE WAY UP TO 35 DEPENDING ON WHAT YOU WANT DONE AND WHAT YOU WANNA OUTSOURCE.
SO THE PROCESS FOR LOOKING FOR A SEARCH FIRM IS THAT YOU WOULD PUT IT OUT TO BID.
AND THEN THEY WOULD COME IN AND THEN THEY, THEN THEY WOULD GO THROUGH SOME EVALUATION BASED ON SOME CRITERIA.
SO WE WOULD PUT TOGETHER A BID PROCESS, UM, IT WOULD GO OUT, THOSE BIDS WOULD COME BACK, THEY WOULD BE REVIEWED.
UM, I IMAGINE YOU WOULD BE UPDATED AND INVOLVED WITH THAT PROCESS, AND THEN WE WOULD AWARD A BID ONCE A CONTRACT'S IN PLACE THAT THAT'S WHEN YOU WOULD REALLY START THE PROCESS OF FILLING THE VACANCY.
SO THE WAY I'VE UH, LOOKED AT IT IS THAT, UM, ONCE AGAIN, WE'RE LOOKING FOR THE CEO OF OUR CITY.
THAT PERSON IS GONNA RUN THE CITY.
UM, AND IN MY MIND THAT, UM, YES, THERE IS A COST ASSOCIATED WITH IT, BUT SOME OF THE BENEFITS TO ME, THE BENEFITS OUTWEIGH MORE THAN THE NON-BENEFITS OF USING A PROFESSIONAL EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM.
UH, AS YOU ALL KNOW, I DID HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK IN FRONT OF THE CMAO, WHICH IS THE CITY MANAGER'S ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA LAST WEEK.
AND THERE, THERE WASN'T ONE PERSON OR FROM A CITY MANAGER OR MAYOR TO EXECUTIVE IN THERE THAT I TALKED TO THAT DAY THAT SAID, USE A SEARCH FIRM.
THAT, THAT DIDN'T SAY, YEAH, YEAH.
THEY SAID, DON'T TRY TO DO THIS INTERNALLY.
THAT, THAT FROM THE PROFESSIONALISM ALSO, YOU TALKED ABOUT THE, THE ANONYMITY THERE.
THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE DID EXPERIENCE BEFORE IS THAT UNTIL THAT APPLICANT SOMETIMES THAT APPLICANT DOES NOT WANT ANYTHING SAID IN THEIR COMMUNITY UNTIL THEY GIVE THE RAISE THEIR HAND.
AND THAT USING A SEARCH FIRM KIND OF, UH, GUARANTEES THAT WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT A TIMELINE.
WELL, WHAT I THOUGHT ABOUT IS THAT, UM, AND ALSO SOMETHING THAT THE, THAT THE WAS SAID AT THE CMAL CONFERENCE IS THAT THIS COUNCIL HERE, WE DON'T HIRE THE NEW CITY MANAGER, IT'S THE NEXT COUNCIL.
WE CAN START THE PROCESS, WE CAN GET IT OUT THERE, UH, GET THE TIMELINE GOING, GET THE THINGS GOING, BUT
[01:30:01]
THAT COUNT, THE NEXT COUNCIL THAT'S GONNA SIT UP HERE, THERE'S GONNA BE THREE NEW PEOPLE.AND I'VE SEEN IT AND WE'VE ALL SEEN IT IN OTHER COMMUNITIES WHERE COUNCILS HAVE COME IN AND SAID, WE DIDN'T HIRE THAT PERSON.
AND WE DON'T, WE DON'T, I DON'T WANT THAT OPTION FOR THE NEXT CITY MANAGER WE HIRE.
IS THAT, UM, IT JUST HAPPENED, UM, IN SOME, SOME CITIES EAST AND WEST OF US.
THEN WHEN I ALSO LOOKED AT, SO WHERE, YOU KNOW, THE SOURCES OF, OF WHERE SOMEONE COULD COME FROM.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT FROM EXECUTIVES SEARCH FIRM GOING OUT, UH, I LOOK AT WE WOULDN'T BE GETTING SOME, IN MY MIND, WE WOULDN'T BE, WOULDN'T BE GETTING SOMEBODY FROM FROM DALLAS, BUT WE WOULD GETTING, HE WOULD BE INTERESTED IN SOMEBODY FROM THE DALLAS REGION, FROM LIKE FRISCO OR SOME OF THE OTHERS SUBURBAN CITIES THAT ARE AROUND THERE.
UH, OR WHEREVER YOU PICK REGIONALLY OR OR OR OUTSIDE OF OKLAHOMA OR INSIDE OF OKLAHOMA.
UM, BUT IT WOULD BE SOMEBODY LIKE THAT WHO'S LOOKING TO MOVE UP.
UH, AND BECAUSE THERE'S DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS THAT A LOT OF, UH, CITY MANAGERS BRING SOME, A LOT OF 'EM HAVE AN ACCOUNTING FINANCE BACKGROUND.
SOME OF 'EM HAVE AN OPERATIONAL BACKGROUND.
SOME OF 'EM HAVE A PUBLIC WORKS BACKGROUND.
SOME OF 'EM HAVE A ECON DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND.
SO THE QUESTION IS, WHAT WOULD THAT, THAT, THAT NEXT COUNCIL REALLY WANT? WHO, WHAT IS THAT PRIORITY THERE? SO THOSE ARE JUST MY THOUGHTS IS THAT, UM, GOING FORWARD, UH, AND THAT, AND ALSO WITH THE DECISION WE MADE TONIGHT WITH OUR INTERIM, I GET IT BACK INTERIM, UM, IS THAT WE'RE IN, WE'RE IN GOOD, GOOD HANDS.
UH, I JUST, IN SOME OF MY RESEARCH, I JUST FOUND OUT THAT THE CITY OF DALLAS, DO YOU KNOW HOW LONG THEY'RE IN INTERIM WITH THE INTERIM? A YEAR AND A HALF A YEAR? THEY JUST, THEY JUST THIS WEEK OR LAST WEEK, THEY FINALLY, UH, AND IT WAS NOT, IT WAS THE INTERIM THAT HIRED, BUT, UM, SO TO ME, WE HAVE TIME, UM, THE TEA LEAVES THAT I'VE LOOKED AT AND TALKED TO OTHER PEOPLE WHO ARE A LOT SMARTER.
THEY DO THIS FOR A WAY OF LIFE.
UM, SAY THAT WE DON'T, WE, WE CAN START THE PROCESS.
THEY RECOMMEND TO ME, UH, THAT WE CAN START THE PROCESS, BUT WE DON'T, THIS COUNCIL HERE DOESN'T HIRE THE NEW CITY MANAGER.
IT IS THE NEW, UM, THE NEW COUNCIL THAT WILL HAVE THAT, THAT, SO THEY CAN SAY THAT'S THE PERSON WE HIRED.
MY THOUGHTS ARE, UM, PRETTY SIMILAR.
UM, OBVIOUSLY I HAVEN'T SPOKEN TO WHO YOU'VE SPOKEN WITH.
UM, MY THOUGHTS ARE ORIGINALLY WE WERE THOUGHT LET'S GET THIS DONE.
SO THE NEW COUNSEL DOESN'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT.
IT'S A LOT OF STRESS TO PUT ON THEM.
HOWEVER, UM, THEY WILL BE WORKING WITH THIS PERSON.
UM, AND THIS IS ALSO A HUGE POSITION NOT TO BE RUSHED AND FILLED IN THREE MONTHS.
UM, I AM AGREEABLE TO ABSOLUTELY GETTING THE PROCESS STARTED SO IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE DELAYED.
UM, MY THOUGHTS ARE TO GO WITH THE EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM, UM, TO KEEP IT OUTTA HOUSE BECAUSE I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR FOLKS TO KEEP THEIR ANONYMITY UNTIL THEY FIND OUT IF THEY'VE EVEN MADE IT THROUGH THE APPLICATION PROCESS.
UM, I KNOW IT'S PUBLIC RECORD THEN, BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE GOING UP TO THAT.
AND, UM, THE CURRENT COUNSEL THAT SITS HERE NOW WILL NOT BE WORKING WITH THIS PERSON.
AND THOSE TWO ALSO HAVE THE INSIGHT OF WORKING UNDER OTHER DIRECTION.
SO I THINK THAT WILL BE HELPFUL IN HIRING A NEW CITY MANAGER.
UM, BUT I, MY THOUGHTS ARE TO AT LEAST GET THIS STARTED.
UM, YEAH, AND I'VE THOUGHT THROUGH THIS AND, AND I THINK A LOT OF US INITIALLY, UM, AND I'M KIND OF AGREEING WITH WHAT YOU GUYS ARE DOING, BUT INITIALLY I THOUGHT DARRELL'S BEEN ON THIS COUNCIL FOR 17 YEARS, RIGHT? WORKED UNDER SEVERAL
[01:35:01]
DIFFERENT, UH, CITY MANAGERS.WE GOT ON THE COUNCIL WHEN LARRY STEVENS WAS HERE, WENT THROUGH THE SEARCH FIRM PROCESS.
UM, AND SO I THINK THERE'S SOME VALUABLE INSIGHT.
ON THE OTHER HAND, UM, I, I THINK, YOU KNOW, IF IT WERE, IF WE HAD SIX OR SEVEN MONTHS, I THINK MAYBE WE DO IT, BUT I JUST LOOK AT THESE TIMELINES AND I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY WAY THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO GET THROUGH A PROCESS AND SELECT SOMEONE BEFORE THE THREE OF US AREN'T ON THERE.
AND WE CAN'T HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVEN'T SWORN AN OATH COME IN ON THE INTERVIEWING BECAUSE THEN IT'S AN OPEN MEETING.
SO I THINK I, YOU KNOW, I'VE KIND OF COME FULL CIRCLE ON IT AND I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S REALISTIC FOR THIS COUNCIL TO BE ABLE TO GET THROUGH THE PROCESS BEFORE WE GO OFF COUNCIL.
I DO AGREE THAT, AND I THINK MAYOR, YOU MAKE A REALLY GOOD POINT IN THAT IF THEY HAVEN'T EXPERIENCED THAT PROCESS AND SEEING WHO'S OUT THERE AND WHAT THE OTHER OPTIONS ARE, UM, THEY MIGHT, YOU KNOW, UH, MONDAY MORNING QUARTERBACK AND SAY, WE DON'T AGREE WITH WHO YOU PICKED.
AND WE KNOW THERE'S, UM, COSTS INVOLVED IN A LOT OF WAYS TO THAT KIND OF CHANGE.
UM, BY THE SAME TOKEN, I THINK OBVIOUSLY WE CAN EXPRESS THINGS TO COUNCILMAN MOORE AND COUNCILWOMAN NICHOLS, UM, ABOUT THINGS THAT WE'VE SEEN AND THAT INSIGHT.
SO, UM, YEAH, I JUST, I DON'T THINK THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR US TO DO IT.
AND I THINK SOME OF YOUR POINTS ARE WELL TAKEN.
UM, WE ARE IN GOOD HANDS WITH A, AN EXCELLENT INTERIM CITY MANAGER, SO THERE'S NOT LIKE A DESPERATE NEED TO FILL IT RIGHT AWAY.
UM, BUT YEAH, JUST IN ALL TRANSPARENCY, I INITIALLY THOUGHT, WELL, WE NEED TO DO THIS 'CAUSE WE HAVE THIS, THIS KNOWLEDGE.
BUT, UM, BUT I'VE KIND OF COME AROUND TO THINK, I THINK WE'VE GOT VALUABLE INSIGHT THAT WE NEED TO SHARE, BUT I THINK THE PROCESS AND THE INTERVIEWING PROBABLY NEEDS TO HAPPEN WITH THE NEXT COUNCIL.
AND THEN I WEEKEND MONDAY MORNING QUARTERBACK THEN
UM, WE'VE GOT THE BROCHURE AND THE JOB DESCRIPTION FROM JUST A FEW YEARS AGO.
UM, AND WELL, AND I WILL SAY TOO THAT WE, UNLESS SOMEONE WAS JUST ABSOLUTELY NOT QUALIFIED, THE COUNCIL, WE WANTED TO LOOK AT ALL THE APPLICATIONS AND DIDN'T WANT THE SEARCH FIRM TO EXCLUDE PEOPLE.
SO IF A SEARCH FIRM IS USED, I REALLY THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOT ALLOW THAT SEARCH FIRM TO NECESSARILY WEED PEOPLE OUT.
UM, BUT HAVE THE COUNCIL SELECTING REALLY LOOK AT, AT THE, AT THE RESUMES.
UM, 'CAUSE LIKE THE MAYOR SAID, THESE PEOPLE CAN COME FROM ALL KINDS OF DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS.
UM, THERE'S CERTAINLY ADVANTAGE TO PEOPLE BEING FROM THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA.
OUR LAWS ARE DIFFERENT FROM OTHER STATES.
UM, AND BEING FAMILIAR WITH THAT, UM, SOME CONNECTION TO THE CITY IS VALUABLE BY THE SAME TOKEN, YOU KNOW, WE NEED THE POOL BIG.
I MEAN, THAT'S A LOT OF WORDS, BUT I AM, I'M FINE WITH, I DON'T KNOW.
I DON'T THINK THIS COUNCIL HAS THE TIME TO DO IT.
AND I THINK YOU ALL MAKE SOME REALLY GOOD POINTS.
CAN I ASK A QUESTION RIGHT BEFORE WE HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS DOWN HERE? I WAS JUST WONDERING, YOU KNOW, ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THIS COUNCIL AND WHAT CAN WE PROVIDE? I DIDN'T KNOW IF, UH, IF THERE'S A WAY THAT, UH, FROM THAT, UH, IS THERE A WAY TO BRING IN, WE DO KNOW THAT THERE'S TWO COUNCIL PEOPLE, TWO, UH, MEMBERS OF THIS COMMUNITY WILL BE SWORN IN IN MAY.
IS THERE A WAY THAT THEY CAN BE A PART OF THIS PROCESS NOW, UM, AS WE GO FORWARD? IS, IS IS THERE A WAY THAT, UH, ONE TO TWO OF THE COUNCIL CAN BE A PART OF THAT WITHOUT GETTING INTO A QUORUM AS PART OF THAT SEARCH COMMITTEE, WORKING WITH STAFF AS WE GO FORWARD? BECAUSE I WAS LOOKING AT HOW DO WE GET, HOW DO WE START GETTING SOME BUY-IN FROM THE NEXT COUNCIL? BECAUSE WE, IF WE'RE GONNA TAKE IT FROM HERE TO HERE, THERE'S GONNA BE A SECTION A TIME WHERE, UM, TWO OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS WOULD JUST BE SITTING ON THE SIDELINE WHERE WE HAVE FOUR OTHERS SITTING ON A FURTHER SIDELINE WANTING TO GET CLOSER TO THE, TO THE MIDDLE.
[01:40:01]
WHAT I MEAN? THEY WANT TO, AND, AND SO IS THERE A WAY TO, TO HAVE THEM INVOLVED TO A CERTAIN DEGREE? YOU, UH, ON PART OF THE COMMITTEE? I DIDN'T, I DIDN'T KNOW.SO THAT'S, THAT'S A, SO IT'S GONNA DEPEND ON THE CAPACITY IN WHICH YOU WANT THEM INVOLVED.
THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO KNOW ANY OF THE PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT APPLICANT'S OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
OR BE INVOLVED IN AN EXECUTIVE SESSION OR INTERVIEWS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
SO THAT MIGHT, I WOULD, WELL, SOMETHING TO CONSIDER THAT IF THERE'S SOME SMALL GRAIN GRANULAR DETAILS THAT THEY CAN GET OR RECEIVE, THAT MIGHT BE SOMETHING AS GO FORWARD.
BUT THAT, THAT WAS MY QUESTION.
I DIDN'T YEAH, I HAD EXPLORED THAT A LITTLE BIT WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY TOO.
UM, THEY'RE NOT SWORN IN, SO THEY'RE REALLY JUST MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AND, AND WE WOULD BE THE SAME AFTERWARDS MM-HMM
SO, I MEAN, I'VE TALKED AND GOTTEN SOME INPUT FROM THOSE FOLKS THAT ARE UN UM, UNOPPOSED.
BUT HERE'S KIND OF THE WAY I, I THINK IT MIGHT HAPPEN IS WE TALK ABOUT DO WE DO A PROFESSIONAL SEARCH FIRM? DO WE PUT IT OUT TO BID, SEE WHO THEY ARE, MAYBE SELECT THE FIRM, START WORKING ABOUT ON THE REQUIREMENTS, MAYBE EVEN POST IT, BUT THEN THE NEXT COUNCIL IS DOING ALL THE REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS AND THE INTERVIEWS AND THE SELECTION.
BECAUSE WE MIGHT NOT EVEN, I MEAN, WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT NEGOTIATING WITH THE, THE FIRM COMING AND ALL THAT, IT, IT MIGHT, IT MIGHT BE IT'S 98 DAYS, BY THE WAY.
WHO'S COUNTING? WHO'S COUNTING? NO, IT'S BEFORE THE, THAT TIME PERIOD THAT WE'RE OFF TO COUNCIL.
THAT'S, THAT'S GONNA GO BY LIKE THAT.
WELL, I, UH, I'VE GONE BACK AND FORTH ON A SEARCH TEAM OR INTERNALLY.
I MEAN, JUST, JUST 'CAUSE SOMEBODY'S GOT AN AIRPLANE TICKET AND A BRIEFCASE DOESN'T MEAN THEY KNOW MORE THAN SOMEBODY THAT ALREADY LIVES HERE MM-HMM
AND TO FLY IN AND PRETEND THAT THEY KNOW ALL ABOUT EDMOND.
BUT I SUPPOSE THEY DO HAVE A, THERE ARE A FEW BENEFITS HIRING A SEARCH FIRM.
UH, I DON'T KNOW WHO, WHO WOULD APPLY AND, OR, OR SET THEMSELVES UP FOR A BID.
BUT I WOULD HOPE IF WE GO THAT DIRECTION, IT'S SOMEBODY THAT UNDERSTANDS THIS REGION OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAYBE HAS A PRETTY GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF OKLAHOMA.
THE OTHER THING THAT COMES TO MY MIND IS WHEN MR. STEVENS WAS SERVING AS CITY MANAGER, I HAD GREAT RESPECT FOR HIM AND THE WAY HE DID BUSINESS ON THE LIMITED TIMES I WAS OBSERVING THAT, BUT HE PUT A CITIZENS COMMITTEE TOGETHER FOR THE FIRE CHIEF AND I HAPPENED TO SIT ON THAT AND, UH, WE MADE A PRETTY GOOD CHOICE.
AND I ALWAYS APPRECIATED HIM DOING THAT.
AND I KNOW HE DID IT FOR OTHER POSITIONS IN THE CITY, UH, JUST SO THE CITIZENRY COULD HAVE A, A HAND IN IT.
AND, UH, THEY CAN GET A GOOD VIBE OF WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING AT.
UH, I THINK IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT TO HAVE MAYOR DAVIS AND COUNCILWOMAN PETERSON AND MUG HEAVILY INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS FOR 98 DAYS.
THEY CARE ABOUT THE CITY AND THEY'RE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THEY NEED TO HAVE AN ACTIVE ROLE IN THIS FOR 98 DAYS.
IT'S SOMETHING THAT I HAD HOPED THAT MS. NICHOLS AND I CAN LEAN ON TO GET SOME ADVICE.
SO I CAN TEACH IT FLAT AROUND.
I CAN GO EITHER WAY ON A SEARCH FIRM OR A DO IT IN-HOUSE.
IT SOUNDS LIKE A SEARCH FIRM'S THE WAY TO GO, AT LEAST WHAT OTHERS PROFESSIONALS HAVE TOLD YOU, MR. MAYOR.
UH, I JUST, I JUST WANT TO BE MINDFUL OF THE SEARCH FIRM AGAIN, THAT THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY'RE DOING FOR OUR PART OF THE COUNTRY AND FOR OUR CITY.
AND I KNOW THAT EVERYBODY IN THIS ROOM BELIEVES OUR CITY'S THE BEST AND WE DO.
SOMEBODY TO COME IN HERE AND TELL US HOW TO, THIS IS WHAT WE NEED TO MAKE IT BETTER.
THIS IS WHAT WE, I THINK THEY NEED TO SAY, THIS IS WHAT WE CAN OFFER YOU TO HELP.
THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR.
[01:45:01]
UH, SO IF IT'S A SEARCH FIRM WE GO WITH, GREAT.IF WE CAN'T GET IT DONE IN 98 DAYS, I UNDERSTAND THE CLOCK'S TICKING, BUT WE CAN MAKE A HELL OF A LOT OF GROUND.
WE CAN MOVE A LOT OF GROUND IN 98 DAYS, MAY NOT GET THE FINAL, BUT I DO GO BACK.
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO HEAR FROM OTHERS, BUT IT'S ONE MAYOR AND ONE COUNCIL AT A TIME.
SO FOR THE NEXT 98 DAYS, THAT'S WHAT YOU GOT.
UM, TO BE HONEST, I WAS GOING BACK AND FORTH ABOUT A SEARCH FIRM AND MAYBE, MAYBE WE DON'T NEED ONE BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT THE DOLLAR AMOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH WHAT IT COST TO HIRE A SEARCH FIRM.
UM, BUT I ALSO DON'T WANT TO DELAY THE PROCESS.
AND IF A SEARCH FIRM EXPEDITES THAT PROCESS, THEN UM, I SEE THE BENEFIT IN THAT AND AGREE WITH COUNCIL COUNCILMAN MOORE ABOUT I WANT YOUR WISDOM AND INSIGHT.
UM, I LOOK FORWARD TO SERVING WITH THE TWO THAT ARE, UM, UNOPPOSED AND WILL BE SWORN IN IN MAY, AND THEN WE'LL HAVE A NEW MAYOR.
UM, I DO SEE WISDOM IN LETTING THEM INTERVIEW.
UM, I SEE WISDOM IN THE, THE PERSON THAT MIGHT APPLY, UM, ALSO WANTING THAT MM-HMM
BUT I WANT YOU ALL TO, UM, BE INVOLVED AND I'D LIKE TO GET GOING AND YEAH, I WOULD ADD ONE OTHER THING.
MAYOR, IF YOU SAID THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER SERVED DALLAS FOR YEAR, YEAR AND A HALF A YEAR.
WE GOT A VERY CAPABLE FELLOW SITTING OVER THERE THAT WAS NAMED INTERIM CITY MANAGER TONIGHT.
SO WE CAN TAKE HER TIME, HE CAN DO THIS JOB AND HE CAN DO IT WELL.
THAT'S WHAT OUR FIRST MOTION WHEN WE CAME OUTTA EXECUTIVE SESSION, TO ME, THAT'S WHAT IT SAID IS THAT WE SET A FOUNDATION FOR US TO SAY, OKAY, WE, WE, WE HAD THAT TAKEN CARE OF.
WE CAN GO FORWARD NOW WITH A, AND AND DO THE PROFESSIONALLY AND, AND WRITE TO GO FORWARD.
AND I THINK OUR, I THINK, WELL, I KNOW FOR ME, MY PERSPECTIVE OF THIS SEAT AND I, THE COUNCIL, I THINK WE WOULD APPRECIATE THAT.
I THINK OUR CITIZENS WOULD APPRECIATE THAT.
AND I KNOW OUR STAFF WOULD APPRECIATE THAT, IS THAT, HEY, THAT'S NOT, THAT'S NOT SPEED, RIGHT? MM-HMM
EXPEDITIOUSLY, BUT THAT'S NOT SPEED.
WELL, AND I'D LIKE TO ADD, UM, I WOULD WELCOME ANY CITIZEN WHO WANTED TO LET ME KNOW WHAT KIND OF QUALITIES THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE.
SO WHETHER THAT BE A CITIZEN, AS SOMEONE WHO'S GOING TO BE APPOINTED IN MAY OR ANYONE, I, I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR THAT.
SO I GUESS THE THING IS WE NEED TO, SOME TYPE OF RESOLUTION WE NEED TO DO, GIVE SOME GUIDANCE.
UM, WHAT'S THAT? WELL, I DO, I DON'T KNOW MR. MAYOR, I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED TO, DO WE NEED, I THINK WE, I THINK WE KNOW WHAT WE WANT TO DO IN TERMS OF MOVING FORWARD A BIT.
SOUNDS LIKE A SEARCH FIRM TIMELINES OPEN, A LOT OF WORK TO DO IN 98 DAYS.
I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU DRAFT IT UP IN A RESOLUTION, BUT WE KNOW WHAT WE WANT TO DO TO A DEGREE.
IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE SAY IT RIGHT HERE TODAY AND THEN STAFF COMES BACK WITH THE VERBIAGE THAT WE NEED ON IN TWO WEEKS AND SAY THE OR, OR DO WE, OR DO WE TAKE THE DRAFT RESOLUTION WE HAVE HERE AND FILL IN DATES FOR THAT? OR, WELL, IF, IF IT SEEMS LIKE YOU'RE NOT IN AS BIG OF A HURRY AS YOU INITIALLY WERE, THEN TONIGHT YOU COULD JUST DIRECT STAFF TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS FROM SEARCH FIRMS, COME BACK AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION, AND THEN AT THAT TIME YOU CAN DECIDE THE NEXT STEP.
IF THAT'S WHAT YOU WANNA DO, MAY BE DONE IN TWO WEEKS, MR. MAYOR, WILL YOU, I SPACE LOOKS LIKE MAYBE NOT.
SO IF, IF YOU'RE RECOMMENDING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM
[01:50:01]
AND WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE, THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD GET TO YOU BY WEDNESDAY TO BE ON THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.I THINK IT, IT'S VERBIAGE, AND I'M NOT TRYING TO YOU DON'T THINK SO? I'M NOT TRYING TO RUSH WOULD IT WOULD BE AN OUTLINE OF THE BID PROCESS.
I DON'T KIND OF LIKE, I DON'T WANNA RUSH THAT IN A SENSE.
BUT IF WE DON'T FIND, YOU KNOW, DEPENDING ON WHAT THE BIDS ARE, WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING, WHO THEY ARE, THEIR BACKGROUND, WE DON'T FIND A GOOD SEARCH FIRM.
YOU KNOW, DO WE, I I GUESS I DON'T, I DON'T WANNA DO SOMETHING TONIGHT THAT SAYS WE ABSOLUTELY ARE PICKING A SEARCH FIRM IN TWO WEEKS, THOUGH.
I THINK THAT'S DEFINITELY WHERE WE'RE LEANING.
BUT UM, BUT I THINK SHE WAS EVEN SAYING WE WOULDN'T, I THINK YOU COULD, THE SEARCH FIRM COULD ON TONIGHT IS TO CHOOSE TO GO THE ROUTE OF AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM AND MOVE FORWARD TO PUT TOGETHER THE BID PROCESS.
BUT THAT DOESN'T REQUIRE US TO HAVE TO USE ONE OF THE EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRMS IF WE DON'T FIND A GOOD CANDIDATE.
SO THAT, THAT STEP WOULD BE TO, TO PUT THE PROCESS OUT TO BID FOR AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM, RIGHT? CORRECT.
JUST BECAUSE WE PUT IT OUT TO BID DOESN'T MEAN WE HAVE TO AWARD A BID AND IT WOULDN'T EVEN GO OUT TO BID UNTIL AFTER WE VOTED ON IT IN TWO WEEKS.
YOU COULD VOTE TONIGHT TO TELL CAROLINE, PUT TOGETHER A, THIS SOLICITATION AND SEEK PROPOSALS.
SHE'LL BRING THE PROPOSALS BACK TO YOU ALL.
IF YOU DON'T LIKE ANY OF THEM, THEN YOU REEVALUATE AND SAY, MAYBE WE DON'T USE ANY OF THESE SEARCH PURPOSES.
AND THAT WOULD JUST BE, RATHER THAN ADOPT ONE OF THESE RESOLUTIONS, YOU JUST TAKE THAT ONE STEP TO NINE AND THEN GO FROM THERE WHEN SHE COMES BACK WITH THE PROPOSAL.
YEAH, BECAUSE TO ME IT DOES SOUND LIKE OVERALL THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES.
UM, AND IT'S PROBABLY WORTH IT.
BUT IF THEY COME BACK AND THEY'RE ALL $60,000 AND THEY'RE IN NEW YORK OR SOMETHING, THEN MAYBE WE THINK IT'S NOT WORTH IT, RIGHT? CORRECT.
HOW LONG DO YOU EXPECT THAT WE WOULD NEED TO LEAVE THE BIDS OPEN? UM, I DON'T, WHAT ARE THE NORMAL GO AHEAD.
YEAH, I MEAN, AGAIN, IT COULD BE, UM, YOU KNOW, IT, WE PROBABLY DON'T WANT TO GO AGAINST THE MINIMUM.
IT'S PROBABLY YOU WANNA LEAVE IT OPEN FOR A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME FOR, UH, RESPONSIBLE FIRMS TO, UH, RESPOND.
SO CERTAINLY PROBABLY LOOKING AT LEAST, UH, IN A MONTH TO, IF NOT LONGER.
SO WE'D HAVE TO BURN UP A MONTH JUST TO FIND OUT IF WE WANNA SAY YES OR NO TO A LIST OF FIRMS. AGAIN, IT, THERE MIGHT BE FIRMS THAT RESPOND QUICKLY, BUT I'LL LET THAT SIGN RESPONSE BECAUSE I, THAT GOES AGAINST MY THOUGHT OF ASKING FOR HELP DOWN HERE AND GUIDANCE.
THAT'S, THAT TAKES IT DOWN TO 68 DAYS.
SO I, I BELIEVE THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT FOR SOMETHING OF THIS NATURE IS 21 DAYS.
THIS IS NOT, THIS IS NOT PUBLIC.
WE'RE SOLICITING PROPOSALS SO DIFFERENT.
I KNOW LAST TIME WE WENT THROUGH THIS PROCESS, WE HAD 14 FIRMS, SO WE PUT IT ON OUR WEBSITE FOR REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS, AND THERE WAS 14 FIRMS THAT SUBMITTED.
SO, BUT WE'RE HAPPY TO WORK WITH COUNCIL HOWEVER LONG YOU FEEL LIKE IT NEEDS TO BE OUT THERE FOR QUALIFIED FIRMS TO BE ABLE TO SUBMIT AND, AND TELL US WHY THEY'RE, THEY COULD HELP US WITH THIS PROCESS.
AND SO WE, WE NEED TO TRY TO GAUGE NOT ONLY OUR POTENTIAL CANDIDATES LOOKING AT US, SEARCH FIRMS ARE SITTING THERE, THEY'RE GONNA TRY TO MAKE A, A DECISION OR DO THEY WANT TO BID OR NOT, OR BASED ON HOW SERIOUSLY THEY THINK WE ARE OR HOW PROFESSIONAL THEY THINK WE ARE.
SO I THINK THAT TAKE TAKES INTO ACCOUNT, UH, HOW LONG WE LEAVE IT OUT THERE.
MAYBE YOU DON'T HAVE TO LEAVE IT OUT THERE 30 DAYS.
MAYBE WE LEAVE IT OUT THERE 21 DAYS.
IS THIS CALENDAR DAYS OR, OR, UM, OR, UM, WHAT'S THE OTHER, IT'S CALENDAR DAYS.
WELL, IT SOUNDS LIKE IT WOULDN'T BE UNREASONABLE TO MEETING AFTER NEXT, HAVE THE FOLKS WHO HAVE APPLIED AND WE COULD POTENTIALLY PICK SOMEONE AT THAT MEETING, WHATEVER THAT IS.
FEBRUARY, FEBRUARY, WHAT? 24TH.
UM, BUT I, AND TO YOUR POINT, COUNCILMAN MOORE, I FEEL LIKE, UM, THE THREE OF US WHO ARE ROLLING OFF COUNCIL, I MEAN, THAT'S PART OF OUR CONTRIBUTION IS SELECTING A SEARCH FIRM THAT WE THINK WILL PROVIDE QUALITY CANDIDATES AND BE RESPONSIVE AND DO A GOOD JOB.
[01:55:03]
BECAUSE I REALLY DON'T THINK WE'RE GONNA BE INTERVIEWING ANYONE THIS COUNSEL.NO, I, I DIDN'T, I DON'T, I DON'T THINK.
WELL, I DON'T, I DIDN'T PLAN FOR US THIS COUNCIL INTERVIEWING ANYONE.
THAT'S ALL ON THE NEW COUN GETTING THE PROCESS TO THAT POINT, UM, OF, SO THEY'LL HAVE, WE CAN HAND SOMETHING OFF TO THAT NEW COUNCIL TO GO FORWARD WITH, BUT I THINK, YOU KNOW, SAY WE SELECT AN EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM, THEN WE CAN CONTRIBUTE TO HERE'S WHAT WE THINK IS IMPORTANT WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT CANDIDATES AND THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.
AND THEN WE'VE CONTRIBUTED TO SELECTING THE SEARCH FIRM AND WHAT WE THINK ARE IMPORTANT QUALIFICATIONS OR CHARACTERISTICS OR SKILLS OR EXPERIENCE OR WHATEVER.
AND I THINK WE'VE GOT TIME TO DO THAT PIECE EXACTLY.
WHERE'S MS. PIERCE? UH, MA'AM, IS 21 DAYS REASONABLE OR TO HAVE SOMETHING PREPARED FOR THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING? UH, WE WOULD GET THE PROPOSAL WRITTEN QUICKLY AND GET IT TO PURCHASING TO GET IT SENT OUT THERE FOR, UH, TO RECEIVE PROPOSALS.
AND YOU'RE COOL WITH THAT? YEAH.
AND THEN THEY COULD PRESENT THE CANDIDATES ON FEBRUARY 24TH.
WE, WE COULD REVIEW THE BIDS OF WHO'S COME IN AND WHO'S SUBMITTED A PROPOSAL AND WHAT THOSE PROPOSALS LOOK LIKE.
WE, WE COULD PUT TOGETHER A SUMMARY FOR YOU BY THAT MEETING.
WHAT WAS THAT, MS. PETERSON BY THAT MEETING? YEAH.
MR. MAYOR, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR A MOTION, IF ONE'S EVEN NEEDED, BUT THAT'S, THAT SOUNDS REASONABLE TO ME.
SO, UM, WE'RE DIRECTING STAFF TO GET THE BID PROPOSALS OUT, GET 'EM OUT AS FAST AS POSSIBLE, UH, ROUGH GUESSTIMATING 21 DAYS, UH, TO LEAVE THEM OUT THERE.
UH, GET 'EM IN, PUT 'EM IN SOME TYPE OF FORMAT FOR US TO REVIEW AND HAVE THEM BASICALLY MAKE A PRESENTATION BACK TO US ON, THE GOAL IS TO MAKE A PRESENTATION ON FEBRUARY 24TH.
MS. MUD, I THINK THAT SOUNDS GOOD.
ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE NEED TO, ANY OTHER DIRECTION WE NEED TO DO AT THIS TIME? COREY? LOOKS LIKE HE'S TRYING TO TELL US SOMETHING.
I, I, BEFORE THE MOTION SECOND STATE, I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.
SO WE'RE, WE'RE DISCUSSING SOLICITING PROPOSALS FOR A SEARCH FIRM WITH THE SELECTION PROCESS TO TAKE PLACE ON FEBRUARY 24TH.
WITH THE SELECTION? WHAT PROCESS? YEAH.
IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THAT ITEM THEN? COUNCIL, COUNCIL, CATCH YOUR VOTE.
UH, MS. BASS, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
UM, NOW WE CAN MOVE ON TO ITEM 13.
WE HAVE NO CITIZENS' COMMENTS.
ITEM 14, COMMENTS FROM THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL.
[14. Comments from the Mayor and Members of the City Council.]
COUNCIL? JUST APPRECIATE, UM, YOU KNOW, THE MAYOR AND THE OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS AS WE'VE KIND OF WORKED THROUGH SOME ISSUES.UM, AND, YOU KNOW, I REALLY RESPECT ALL OF YOU VERY MUCH AND, AND VALUE MY RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU.
AND SO, UM, AND THEN ALSO WANT TO THANK, UM, MR. ENTZ FOR BEING WILLING TO STEP FORWARD AND ACT IN THIS ROLE AND GIVE US THE SPACE TO EXPLORE THE NEXT PERMANENT CANDIDATE WITHOUT WORRYING.
AS YOU, OUR CITY IS STILL GOING FORWARD, IS STILL DOING THINGS.
UM, YESTERDAY THEY HAD THE CELEBRATION OF THE, WAS THE YEAR OF THE DRAGON CELEBRATION.
SO GUESS WHAT? LIFE STILL GOES ON IN THIS, AND WE ARE STILL PART OF IT GOING FORWARD, AND I JUST, I APPRECIATE EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU ALL, UM, AS WE, AS WE GO THROUGH THESE STEPS AND, UH, APPRECIATE THE STAFF THAT'S HERE, THAT WE'RE TAKING EACH STEP DAY AT A TIME, APPRECIATE A LAW OF ENFORCEMENT TO HELP KEEP US SAFE IN OUR COMMUNITY.
[02:00:02]
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.THANK THE THREE OF YOU VERY, VERY MUCH FOR YOUR 98 DAYS.
YOU GOT IT FOR, FOR A WILLINGNESS TO DO THAT, MR. ENTZ.
ANYTHING ELSE? COUNSEL? ITEM 15.
ADJOURNMENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
YOUR VOTE WE'RE HEREBY ADJOURNED.