[00:00:04]
[1. Call to Order of the Edmond Planning Commission.]
JUNE 3RD, 2025 OF THE EDMOND PLANNING COMMISSION.I WILL, UH, HAVE EVERYBODY LOOK AT THE, REVIEW THE MINUTES AND SEE IF WE HAVE ANY CHANGES AND OR COMMENTS.
OTHERWISE, I'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
THAT MOTION CARRIES AN ACCOUNT OF FOUR TO ZERO.
[2. General Consent Items: Items listed under General Consent are usually approved as a group with the proper motion from a member of the Planning Commission. Members of the Planning Commission may pull any item under General Consent for separate discussion and/or action.]
ON, WE WILL NOW MOVE TO THE GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS. UH, ITEMS LISTED UNDER THE GENERAL CONSENT ARE USUALLY APPROVED AS A GROUP AS A PROPER MOTION FROM THE MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY PULL ANY ITEM UNDER GENERAL CONSENT FOR A SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND OR ACTION.
DO ANY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION WISH TO HEAR ANY OF THE A, B, OR C AGENDA ITEMS HEARD SEPARATELY? IF NOT, I'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION IN A SECOND.
WE APPROVE THE CONSENT ITEMS. WE HAVE A MOTION SECOND AND WE HAVE A SECOND.
THOSE ITEMS CARRY ON A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO AND WE'LL MOVE TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JUNE 23RD, 2025.
MOVING ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
[A. Case No. Z25-00012; Public Hearing and Consideration of a Rezoning property that is near the intersection of Sorghum Mill Rd & Coltrane Rd from “G-A” General Agricultural to “A” Single Family Dwelling District. (Tanner Consulting, LLC; Ward 2).]
THREE, THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. MOVING ON TO K OR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER A CASE NUMBER Z 25 DASH 0 0 0 1 2.PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING PROPERTY THAT IS NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF SORGHUM MILL AND COLTRANE.
AS YOU INDICATED, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FROM GA, GENERAL AGRICULTURE TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING.
THE APPROXIMATELY 63 ACRES, SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SORGHUM MILL, WEST OF COLTRANE.
YOU CAN SEE IT HERE ON THE MAP.
ZONING AND USES INCLUDE LARGE LOT RURAL DISTRICTS TO THE NORTH AND EAST, WHICH ARE UNDEVELOPED OR CONTAIN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES.
ADDITIONALLY TO THE EAST, THERE'S A LARGE AREA OF DO SUBURBAN OFFICE THAT IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED.
DIRECTLY WEST IS ZONED A AND IT IS DEVELOPED AS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED THE LIBERTY PARK, PUD, WHICH IS A LARGE MIXED USE DISTRICT THAT IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED.
UH, THIS APPLICANT APPLICATION DETAILS IS, UH, INCLUDES A REQUEST FOR BUY RIGHT DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS WITH A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 6,000 SQUARE FEET.
THE PLAN 2018 CATEGORIZES THE AREA AS SUBURBAN TWO NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE EIGHT DISTRICT CAN BE APPROPRIATE IN THIS PLAN CATEGORY SO LONG AS PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER ARE PROVIDED AND CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT TRAJECTORY IN THE AREA, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
DO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CITY STAFF AT THIS TIME? HEARING NONE.
DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO? THANK YOU.
UH, DO YOU CARE TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF MR. BRYAN? WE'RE, UH, MY NAME'S MEGAN PASCO WITH TANNER CONSULTING.
UM, WE'RE IN AGREEMENT WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AND I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ANY QUESTIONS OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME? I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE COMMENT THAT, UH, I HOPE WHENEVER I KNOW WE REALIZE IT'S NOT BEFORE US AT THIS POINT IN TIME, BUT THE CONNECTIVITY TO THE EXISTING STREETS IS SOMETHING THAT I HOPE THAT THE DEVELOPER IS LOOKING AT.
YES, I HAVE A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, BUT IF, BUT JUST WANTED TO MENTION THAT.
YES, THAT IS, IT'S, IT'S A, IT'S A CONSIDERATION FOR CONNECTION IN MY LIFE.
CONNECTIVITY AND SHARING IS IMPORTANT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE APPLICANT? I THINK MY ONLY COMMENT I HAVE IS, YOU KNOW, I KNOW THAT THIS SAYS MINIMUM OF 6,000 SQUARE FOOT, THAT WOULD BE THE SMALLEST IN THE AREA.
I WOULD HOPE THAT THEY WOULD BE CLOSER TO THE ONES THAT ALREADY OUT THERE.
UH, SO I'M A REPRESENTATIVE FOR GOLD TEAM REALTY, UM, AND MR. ALLEN STAUB, HIS INTENT, LET ME BACK UP.
HE WAS THE, UH, DEVELOPER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST.
HIS INTENT IS TO DEVELOP IT IN A SIMILAR FASHION.
UM, HALF ACRE LOTS THAT ARE VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT'S TO THE WEST AND, AND HOMES OF THE SAME.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I MAKE A MOTION TO, UH, STOP THE MEETING.
THANK YOU COMMISSIONER CHER FOR BEING HERE.
ANY COMMENTS OF ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AT THIS TIME? SEEING NO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC PRESENT, WE WILL MOVE ON.
I'M LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THIS AGENDA ITEM.
[00:05:04]
I READ ABOUT IT.ALRIGHT, MOVING ON TO CITIZENS' COMMENTS.
SEEING NO, THIS IS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANY CITIZENS THAT WANT TO SPEAK ON ITEMS THAT ARE PERTINENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT WERE NOT ON THE AGENDA.
ANYBODY WISH TO MAKE COMMENTS AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE.
[6. Comments from the Planning Commission Chair and Members.]
I'LL ASK COMMISSIONERS.THIS IS THE, I THIS IS THE COMMENTS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIONER CHAIR OR OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION? I HAVE NONE.
DO ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY COMMENTS AT THIS TIME? KEN, I'VE GOT A, I'VE GOT A QUESTION ON THAT STORAGE FACILITY, THE GENERAL CONSENT ITEM, HOW OFTEN AND WHAT, IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S OUT OF ORDER THAT IT GOT BUILT BEFORE THERE'S A FINAL PLAT BEING APPROVED.
IS, AM I MISUNDERSTANDING THAT OR? I DON'T THINK SO.
I IT'S, WELL FIRST OF ALL, BACKWARDS.
UM, I'LL KEEP MY COMMENTS EXTREMELY BRIEF SINCE THIS WAS ON THE AGENDA EARLIER.
ON COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, IT'S NOT UNCOMMON THAT THAT, THAT THAT HAPPENS.
I THINK THIS ONE JUST WAS A SLIGHTLY MORE DELAYED THAN WE, THAN WE SOMETIMES SEE, BUT OKAY.
THEY HAVE A LOT MORE FLEXIBILITY 'CAUSE THEY'RE JUST PLATING ONE LOT.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NONE, WE'LL MOVE ON.
I'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING.
WE HAVE A, A MOTION SECOND AND A SECOND AND A VOTE OF FIVE.