Dec 08, 2025 City Council / Public Works Authority

RECESS OF THE EDMOND CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND CALL TO ORDER OF THE EDMOND PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING.

FIVE ZERO ITEM THREE.

[3. Recess of the Edmond City Council Meeting and Call to Order of the Edmond Public Works Authority Meeting.]

DO I HAVE A MOTION? SO MOVED.

WE'RE NOW IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING.

ITEM

[4. Public Works Authority General Consent Items: Items listed under General Consent are usually approved as a group with the proper motion from a member of the Public Works Authority. Members of the Public Works Authority may pull any item under General Consent for separate discussion and/or action.]

FOUR, PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY, GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS. THERE ARE FOUR ITEMS THIS EVENING.

DO I HAVE A MOTION MR. MAYOR? I MOVE TO, UH, PASS THE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY.

GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS? SECOND, SECOND.

ON ITEM SIX ON THE AGENDA.

THERE IS NOTHING FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.

SO WE'RE

[6. Adjournment of the Edmond Public Works Authority Meeting and Reconvene the Edmond City Council Meeting.]

ADJOURN OF ED EDMUND PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING AND RECONVENE THE EDMUND CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

DO I HAVE A MOTION? SO MOVED.

WE ARE BACK IN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

[7. City Council General Consent Items: Items listed under General Consent are usually approved as a group with the proper motion from a member of the Council. Members of the Council may pull any item under General Consent for separate discussion and/or action.]

ITEM SEVEN IS CITY COUNCIL GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS. UM, I WOULD LIKE TO PULL ITEM SEVEN I FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.

IS THERE ANY OTHER ITEM ON THERE THAT ANYONE WOULD LIKE PULLED? SEEING NONE, I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR SEVEN A THROUGH L WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AYE.

SOLE MOVE.

MAYOR.

NOW ONTO ITEM EIGHT, INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION ITEMS FROM OUR PREVIOUS ITEM.

I HAVE A MOTION, A SECOND.

[A. Consideration of City Council General Consent Agenda Items Pulled for Separate Discussion and/or Action.]

WE HAVE ITEM I CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL AND APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH LONE STAR TACTICAL BUILDINGS FOR THE LIVE FIRE TRAINING CENTER IN THE AMOUNT OF $487,256 AND 6 CENTS.

CHIEF, WOULD YOU LIKE TO EXPLAIN WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THIS ONE? MAYOR COUNCIL, TERRY , FIRE CHIEF AND I AM GLAD TO SAY THAT THERE WILL BE MINIMAL TO ZERO ONGOING COSTS WITH THIS TRAINING BUILDING.

THINK OF IT AS A, UH, UH, IT'S A STRUCTURE OF INTERCONNECTED STEEL BOXES.

TWO STORY THAT ARE BUILT SPECIFICALLY FOR DIRECT FIRE CONTACT AND IT'LL ALLOW US TO DO SOME THINGS WE CAN'T CURRENTLY DO.

UH, SIMULATE, UM, REAL FIRE CONDITIONS SAFELY, OF COURSE, REAL FIRE AND SMOKE CONDITIONS, UH, THAT WE ENCOUNTER IN STRUCTURE FIRES.

ANY THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS? I I'VE JUST GOT ONE AND I WANNA THANK YOU FOR, FOR GIVING THAT EXPLANATION.

UM, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE BEEN TRYING TO BE REAL MINDFUL OF IS MAKING SURE THAT IF WE HAVE FUTURE OPERATIONAL COSTS, MAINTENANCE COSTS ON CAPITAL ITEMS, THAT WE KNOW WHAT THEY ARE.

SO YES SIR.

APPRECIATE THAT INPUT.

WHAT'D Y'ALL LIKE TO DO? MOVE TO APPROVE.

SECOND MAYOR, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND CAST YOUR VOTE.

WE'RE NOW ON ITEM NINE, CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ITEM A IS CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET AMENDMENT TO TRANSFER APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE BUDGET TO THE CITY COUNCIL BUDGET EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1ST, 2026 TOTALING $38,725.

[A. Consideration of Approval of a Budget Amendment to Transfer Appropriations from the City Manager's Office Budget to the City Council Budget, Effective January 1, 2026; Totaling $38,725.00 (Citywide): From the City Manager's Office Budget for Regular Pay - Civilians to the City Council Budget for Regular Pay - Civilians; $28,561.00; From the City Manager's Office Budget for Retirement - Civilians to the City Council Budget for Retirement - Civilians; $3,425.00; From the City Manager's Office Budget for Group Insurance Premium to the City Council Budget for Group Insurance Premium; $3,768.00; From the City Manager's Office Budget for Social Security Tax to the City Council Budget for Social Security Tax; $1,779.00; From the City Manager's Office Budget for Medicare Tax to the City Council Budget for Medicare Tax; $416.00; From the City Manager's Office Budget for Sick Leave Incentive Pay to the City Council Budget for Incentive Pay; $27.00; From the City Manager's Office Budget for Bonus Incentive Pay to the City Council Budget for Bonus Incentive Pay; $98.00; From the City Manager's Office Budget for Health Clinic Costs to the City Council Budget for Health Clinic Costs; $411.00; From the City Manager's Office Budget for Training - Registration to the City Council Budget for Training - Registration; $240.00.]

UM, I BELIEVE YOU ALL CAN READ ALL THE BULLETS UNDERNEATH IT.

UH, JUST SO EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS WHAT THAT IS.

WHEN WE, WHEN WE APPOINTED A NEW ASSISTANT TO THE CITY COUNCIL SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, WE MOVED HER UNDERNEATH THE CITY COUNCIL BUDGET, BUT THE BUDGET HAD ALREADY BEEN APPROVED

[00:05:01]

AND THAT MONEY WAS SITTING IN THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE.

SO ALL OF THESE LINE ITEMS THAT YOU'RE SEEING MOVED HERE IS SIMPLY MOVING THE PAY AND THE BENEFITS OVER FROM CITY COUN, FROM THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE TO THE CITY COUNCIL BUDGET.

ANYONE UP ELSE UP HERE WANNA MAKE ANY COMMENTS? WOULD ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE? SEEING NONE, I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION MOVE APPROVAL OF NINE A MAYOR SECOND.

[B. Public Hearing and Consideration of Acceptance of the Federal Fiscal Year 2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (Citywide)]

NINE B, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2024 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT.

CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT.

GOOD EVENING.

CHRISTIE BATTERSON, DIRECTOR OF HOUSING COMMUNITY RESOURCES.

IT'S MY PLEASURE AND I'M SUPER EXCITED TO BE UP HERE TALKING ABOUT OUR CONSOLIDATED ACTION REPORT.

THIS IS BASICALLY WHAT OUR REPORT IS REQUIRED TO DO BY HUD THAT WE HAVE TO, UM, HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON TO LET YOU ALL KNOW WHAT WE ENDED UP WITH FOR THE YEAR.

THERE WE GO.

UH, JUST A REMINDER, OUR CAPER OVERVIEW.

SO THIS AGAIN, IS WHAT WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.

UM, OUR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR, UH, RUNS ON OCTOBER 1ST, 2024 TO SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2025.

IT'S DUE 90 DAYS AFTER THE END OF THE FISCAL YEAR, SO WE'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING, A TWO WEEK COMMENT PERIOD, AND THEN WE'LL TURN IT INTO HUD BY, UH, BY THE END OF DECEMBER.

SO I PUT THIS, UM, SLIDE UP HERE JUST TO REMIND EVERYBODY OF WHAT OUR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WERE FOR FY 24.

CODE COMPLIANCE, UM, A DA ACCESSIBILITY AND PRIORITY WOULD BE GIVEN TO THOSE IN THE CDBG AREA.

WE ALSO HAD HOME BUYER'S ASSISTANCE UP TO 14,999.

THAT WAS JUST ON DOWN PAYMENT ONLY, AND THAT'S 50% OF A REQUIRED DOWN PAYMENT.

WE ALSO PRIORITIZED, UH, OUR NEIGHBORHOODS TREE PROGRAMMING.

SO IF THERE WAS A TREE THAT WAS CAUSING LIFE AND SAFETY ISSUES TO THE HOME, WE WOULD REMOVE THAT.

AND OF COURSE, WE ALLOCATED FUNDING TO OUR PUBLIC SERVICES.

AGAIN, JUST SORT OF A REMINDER, UM, ALL THE PROGRAMS THAT WE DO THROUGHOUT CDBG ARE FOR THOSE THAT ARE 80% OR BELOW AREA MEDIA AND INCOME, THOSE INCOME LIMITS CHANGE EVERY MAY.

SO FOR THE MAJORITY OF FEDERAL FISCAL GEAR 24, A PERSON MAKING, UM, UNDER $54,750 WOULD QUALIFY, OR A FAMILY OF FOUR WOULD BE 78,150.

SO WE PROPOSED OUR BUDGET OF $637 NINE HUNDRED AND FIFTY SIX HUNDRED THIRTY $7,958.

UM, AGAIN, MAJORITY OF OUR BUDGET GOES TO HOUSING ACTIVITIES.

WE HAVE A 15% MAX ON PUBLIC SERVICES AND 20% MAX ON ADMINISTRATION.

UM, OUR ALLOCATION THAT WE RECEIVED FROM HUD WAS $537,958, AND WE USED A HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM PREVIOUS YEARS THAT WE HAD, UM, SET ASIDE THAT WE DIDN'T USE.

THERE'S A LOT ON THIS SLIDE, BUT, UM, WHAT THIS SAYS IS THAT WE ENDED UP USING $620,783.

UM, WE CAME IN, UM, AROUND 9,500 BELOW BUDGET, UM, PRIMARILY IN OUR HOUSING REHABILITATION FUNDING.

UM, WE USED ALMOST EVERY PENNY THAT WE HAD, BUT, UM, WE ENDED UP WITH, UH, 10 PEOPLE ON A WAITING LIST JUST BECAUSE WE COULDN'T CONTINUE KNOWING THAT THOSE WERE PROBABLY GONNA COME, UH, BIDS WERE GONNA COME BACK HIGHER.

UM, AND THEN WE HAD WHAT WE CALL PROGRAM INCOME.

WE HAD, UM, BECAUSE WE DO PUT A SOFT LIEN ON PROPERTY AFTER A REHABILITATION OR ON HOME BUYER'S ASSISTANCE, WE HAD SOMEONE SELL THEIR HOME BEFORE THEIR END, UH, FIVE YEAR, UH, QUALIFICATION PERIOD HAD ENDED.

AND SO THEY REPAID US AROUND $3,100.

AND THAT'S CONSIDERED PROGRAM INCOME AND IT GOES AGAINST OUR PUBLIC SERVICES.

UM, SO WE SET THAT ASIDE.

UM, KNOWING THAT WE COULDN'T GO OVER OUR 15% MAX, WHAT REALLY TELLS THE STORY IS HOW MANY PEOPLE WE'VE SERVED.

UM, WE IN HOUSING AND NON HOUSING PROJECTS, WE CAN, WE ASSISTED AROUND 27 INDIVIDUALS.

UM, AND I HAVE THE BREAKOUT HERE.

OUR HOUSING REHABILITATION, WE SERVED SIX.

AND THOSE ARE THOSE OWNER OCCUPIED REHABILITATIONS.

UM, PRIMARILY FULL WINDOW PACKAGES, HVAC UNITS, ROOFS,

[00:10:01]

UM, NEW FLOORING, A DA ACCESSIBILITY.

UH, WE ALSO DID, WE KICKED OFF A WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM THAT WAS PRIMARILY, UM, WHERE WE WENT IN AND WE DID AN ENERGY ASSESSMENT ON A HOME.

AND THEN, DEPENDING ON WHAT ENERGY THEY WERE LOSING THROUGHOUT THEIR HOME, IS WHAT WE DID.

A LOT OF IT WAS WINDOW PACKAGES, INSULATION, DOOR SEALS, UM, ET CETERA.

THOSE, UM, WERE AROUND, WE ASSISTED FIVE, WE DID SIX HOME BUYERS ASSISTANCE, AND THEN WE DID 10 NEIGHBORHOOD TREE PROGRAM.

AND I HAD THE BREAKOUT OF HOW MUCH, UM, WE SPENT IN EACH OF THOSE AREAS.

BUT I WANTED TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION KIND OF WHAT THAT MEANT.

THAT'S THERE'S MORE TO IT THAN JUST ASSISTING 27 INDIVIDUALS.

UM, THE HOMES THAT WE ASSISTED RANGED FROM 1949 TO 2004.

UH, THE MAJORITY OF THEM WERE IN THE 1960S, 1970S BEING BUILT IN THAT TIMEFRAME ON THE OWNER-OCCUPIED REHABILITATIONS.

THE MAJORITY OF THEM WERE OUTSIDE OUR CDBG AREA, BUT THEY WERE WITHIN QUALIFIED CENSUS TRACKS.

UM, SEVERAL UNITS AROUND THE EDMOND MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL AREA.

UH, SEVERAL I, UM, AROUND THE KELLY PARK AREA, UM, ACROSS LIKE IN THE RIPPLE CREEK AREA ACROSS FROM SANTA FE HIGH SCHOOL.

ALL OUR HOME BUYERS' ASSISTANCES WERE WITHIN THE CDBG AREA, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ONE THAT WAS BARELY OUTSIDE, UM, AROUND, UH, MEMORIAL.

UM, SO THAT REALLY TELLS YOU THE STORY OF THAT WE ARE ASSISTING FAMILIES WITH THAT AGING HOUSING STOCK AND EXACTLY WHERE WE THINK IT IS.

UM, THE REASON WHY WE WERE SUCCESSFUL, UM, IN PREVIOUS YEARS, WE'VE NOT HAD A LOT OF REQUESTS FROM HOME, UH, REHABILITATION PROGRAMMING.

AND THAT ONE OF THE SUCCESSES REASON WHY I THINK THIS WAS SUCCESSFUL IS BECAUSE I BROUGHT THE REHAB SPECIALIST IN-HOUSE.

SO PATRICK TON, WHO IS SPLIT WITH BUILDING SERVICES, UM, HALF OF HIS TIME IS WITH BUILDING INSPECTION.

HALF OF HIS TIME IS WITH CDBG BECAUSE I HAVE SOMEONE THAT CAN CONCENTRATE TIME, UM, WITH HOMEOWNERS AS WELL AS CONTRACTORS.

I THINK WE'VE BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN SERVING MORE PEOPLE.

ADDITIONALLY, WE HAD A CONTRACTOR'S FAIR THIS YEAR WHERE WE WERE ABLE TO BRING SEVERAL CONTRACTORS IN TO LEARN ABOUT OUR PROGRAMMING.

UM, AND SO THAT'S INCREASED THE NUMBER OF CONTRACTORS WE HAVE THAT WHEN WE DO OUR BIDS THAT CAN BID ON THE PROJECTS.

UM, WE'VE ALSO DONE A LOT OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH WITH MARKETING.

WE DID THE REGULARIZATION PROGRAM, WE KICKED THAT OFF.

WE ALSO HAVE PARTNERED WITH, UM, HOME DEPOT AND TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION TO ASSIST VETERANS.

UM, AND SO WE'RE MAKING THAT COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PARTNERSHIPS THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY.

THE WEATHERIZATION IS NEW.

UH, WE KICKED THAT OFF IN THE SPRING AND HOPEFULLY, UM, OUR GOAL IS, IS BACK IN IN FEBRUARY, WE'RE GONNA REASSESS THOSE HOMES TO SEE IF THEY ACTUALLY DID SAVE MONEY ON THEIR UTILITIES AFTER DOING SOME OF THOSE RE UH, WEATHERIZATION, UM, REHABILITATIONS.

SO I REALLY CONTRIBUTE OUR SUCCESS.

AND SO FAR THIS YEAR, WE'RE ALMOST THREE MONTHS INTO THE NEW FEDERAL FISCAL.

WE'VE ALREADY HIT 11 HOMES, UM, AND ASSISTING 11 HOMES THIS YEAR.

UM, WE ENDED THE YEAR LAST SEPTEMBER.

UM, I ACTUALLY HAD TO KIND OF TAKE THINGS OFF THE WEBSITE FOR A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE WE ALREADY HAD A WAITING LIST OF OVER 10 PEOPLE NEEDING ASSISTANCE, BUT I DIDN'T HAVE THE FUNDING STARTED, HADN'T STARTED UNTIL OCTOBER ONE.

UM, AND AGAIN, WE HAVE A WAITING LIST OF ABOUT THREE RIGHT NOW.

UM, BUT WHAT WE HAVE FIVE ACTIVE REHABS GOING ON.

SO YOU'LL HEAR ME TIME AND TIME AGAIN TALK ABOUT OUR PUBLIC SERVICES, ABOUT THE NONPROFITS, UM, THAT ASSIST US IN PROVIDING SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY.

OVER 4,300 PEOPLE WE'RE SERVED WITH THAT, UM, WITH THOSE FUND, WITH THAT FUNDING SPREAD OUT BETWEEN FIVE, UM, WELL, FIVE, UH, NONPROFITS, HOPE CENTER, UH, DID, UM, A FOOD BANK BECAUSE THEY STILL HAD EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE.

THEY WERE PROVIDING PROJECT 66 EDMOND MOBILE MEALS, EDMOND PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION.

THEY ALSO HAD A, A FOOD BANK THAT THEY CONTRIBUTED TO UP AT THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND THEN A UR SPECIAL.

THIS WAS THE LAST YEAR FOR UR SPECIAL.

ACCORDING TO HUD, I CAN NO LONGER GIVE THEM FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.

THEY DO NOT QUALIFY.

UM, HOWEVER, THEY GET OTHER ASSISTANCE FROM THE CITY OF EDMOND TO HELP OFFSET THEIR, UM, PROGRAMMING THAT THEY DO.

SO THIS WAS OUR LAST YEAR OF OUR FIVE YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN, UM, FOR PREVIOUS THAT STARTED IN 2020.

I WANTED, I THOUGHT THIS WAS A VERY IMPORTANT TO BRING FORWARD TO YOU HOW MANY PEOPLE WE'VE SERVED OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS.

UM, WE'VE SERVED JUST A LITTLE OVER 27,000 PEOPLE AND WE SPENT, AS YOU CAN SEE, ALMOST $2 MILLION OR ACTUALLY ALMOST $3 MILLION IN ACTIVITIES OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS.

THIS IS NOT INCLUDING, UM, ADDITIONAL FUNDING THAT WE RECEIVED.

UH, CARE'S.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT CAME OUT OF CARE IS THAT I ALWAYS SAY IS THE POSITIVE THING IF YOU COULD HAVE A PO POSITIVE

[00:15:01]

THING OUT OF COVID WAS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAVE OUT A LOT OF MONEY BECAUSE OF PROGRAMMING AND POLICIES, PROCEDURES THAT ARE ALREADY IN PLACE.

AND THE AMAZING TEAM THAT I HAVE, WE WERE GIVEN MORE MONEY THAN, UM, MOST COMMUNITIES WERE, AND WE WERE ABLE TO SPEND IT ALL IN A TIMELY MANNER.

UM, THERE ARE STILL SOME PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO SPEND THE REST OF THEIR CARES MONEY IN 2026, OURS IS ALL GONE.

UM, WE HAVE SPENT EVERY PENNY OF IT AND, UM, AND I, I'M VERY PROUD OF THAT.

UM, WE RECEIVED $500,000 FROM THE OKLAHOMA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY THAT WENT TO EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE THAT WAS AWARDED TO THE HOPE CENTER.

AND THEY CONCLUDED THAT FUNDING IN SEPTEMBER AS WELL.

WE RECEIVED ALMOST $2 MILLION IN OKLAHOMA COMMERCE CARES MONEY THAT WENT TO A VARIETY OF ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS NORTH CARE RENTAL ASSISTANCE TO HOPE CENTER, ME, UH, EDMOND MOBILE MEALS AND PROJECT 66.

UM, AND WE DID SO WELL WITH OUR HUD CARES MONEY THAT THEY JUST GAVE ME MORE .

UM, AND SO WE USED THE FINAL BIT OF THAT FOR EDMOND MOBILE'S MILL REHABILITATION.

SO I THINK THAT'S SAYING SOMETHING, UH, $3 MILLION IN FIVE YEARS, 27,000 PERSONS THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY, UM, I THINK IS SOMETHING TO BE PROUD OF.

SO STAFF TOOK THIS THROUGH CITIZEN PARTICIPATION COMMITTEE THAT WHO HAS JURISDICTION OVER OUR ACTION PLAN IN CONSOLIDATED DATED PLAN ON NOVEMBER 13TH MEETING.

AND THEY PASSED IT FOR RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVAL AND STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS IT FOR APPROVAL.

AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS? NO REAL QUESTIONS.

I, ONE COMMENT, AND, AND THIS IS ASSUMING I'M THINKING CORRECTLY AND MY MATH IS CORRECT, WHICH I'M GUARANTEEING NOT NEITHER, BUT IF I LOOK AT YOUR SUMMARY ALLOCATIONS, LET, LET'S JUST TAKE THIS YEAR, THE THING THAT STRIKES ME AGAIN, IF I'M CORRECT, PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION COULD BE AT MUCH AS 20% AND IT WAS ONLY 16%.

SO WE, WE SAVED ABOUT $24,000 THERE THAT I'M ASSUMING THAT THAT ALLOWED US TO BE, PROVIDE MORE, MORE SERVICE, MORE TO TO PEOPLE.

IS THAT CORRECT? SO KIND OF, SO WHAT I DIDN'T MENTION IS IN OUR ADMINISTRATION FEE, WE ACTUALLY PAID METRO FAIR HOUSING TO DO OUR, UM, COMPLAINTS OR, UH, DISCRIMINATION IN HOUSING THAT IS ACTUALLY COUNTED AS PART OF OUR ADMINISTRATION MAX.

SO THEY GET 10,000 AND WE GET THE REMAINING AMOUNT.

SO IT'S REALLY 99,926.

THAT'S OUR PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.

SO JUST FOR STAFF AND PROGRAM OVERSIGHT FOR THE CITY IS ALMOST 90,000.

SO, BUT 10,000 OF THAT A HUNDRED THOUSAND IS METRO FAIR HOUSING.

SO STILL, I MEAN, IT COULD HAVE BEEN 1 24.

AND THAT'S, SO THAT'S THAT 20% MAX ADMINISTRATION, THAT PUBLIC SERVICE MAX, YOU CANNOT GO OVER , RIGHT? YEAH.

SO BY BEING UNDER, THERE'S MORE MONEY TO DO, TO PROVIDE SERVICE IS CORRECT.

MY POINT TO ALL OF THAT, THAT'S ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.

AND ANYTHING THAT I DON'T HAVE IN THAT MAX OF ADMINISTRATION OR PUBLIC SERVICE GOES TO HOUSING ACTIVITIES AS MUCH AS WE CAN.

SO, SO VERY GOOD JOB.

DO A GREAT JOB, UM, WITH THEIR DILIGENCE AND THEIR, UH, THEIR FINANCIAL, UM, MANAGEMENT OF THIS PROGRAM, UH, AS WELL AS THEIR EMPATHY.

JUST ONE CLARIFICATION ON THE 27,000 OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS, IS THAT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS? YES.

AND THEY'RE IN THE EDMOND AREA? YES.

WE ONLY SERVE WITHIN EDMOND CORPORATE LIMITS ARE CITY LIMITS.

SO, AND ALL OUR PUBLIC SERVICES AS WELL, ALL QUALIFICATIONS.

WHEN WE QUALIFY SOMEONE FOR EITHER HOME BUYER'S ASSISTANCE OR UNOCCUPIED REHABILITATION, THEY HAVE TO SHOW US PROOF OF, UM, OF, THROUGH A VARIETY OF PAPERWORK THAT THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE.

SO ALL OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS ARE HERE IN EDMOND.

THAT'S GREAT.

IT'S SURPRISING AS A PERCENTAGE OF OUR POPULATION.

A LITTLE BIT.

AND JUST REMIND ME OR REMIND THE PUBLIC IF THEY MAY BE WATCHING, HOW CAN THEY CONNECT WITH THESE SERVICES? UM, SO ON OUR WEBSITE, UM, WE UNDER COMMUNITY RESOURCES, UM, LISTS ALL OUR PROGRAMS THAT WE HANDLE, UM, INTERNALLY, THOSE THAT WE HAVE PARTNERSHIPS, AND THEN THERE'S A WHOLE LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS AS WELL THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY AND THE METRO AREA OF RESOURCES AVAILABLE.

AND THEY CAN GIVE US A CALL, CALL AND WE CAN HELP THEM.

MM-HMM .

UM, RENTAL ASSISTANCE, YOU KNOW, UTILITY ASSISTANCE WOULD BE HOPE CENTER AND, YOU KNOW, OR THE, BUT ALL THAT CONTACT INFORMATION IS ON OUR CITY WEBSITE UNDER COMMUNITY RESOURCES.

IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS COME FORWARD? STATE YOUR NAME, AD AND ADDRESS PLEASE.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND CA, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, UH, CODY BOYD, 2 3 0 EAST SEVENTH IN EDMOND.

UM, I'M SPEAKING TO YOU TODAY AS THE VICE CHAIR OF THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION COMMITTEE.

UH, AND I DON'T REALLY HAVE MUCH SUBSTANTIVE INFORMATION TO ADD.

UH, I DO WANNA COMMEND CHRISTIE AND HER TEAM.

I THINK THEY

[00:20:01]

'CAUSE WE, THEY, UH, I WOULDN'T HAVE THOUGHT MANY YEARS AGO TO TELL FOLKS THAT THE CITY OF EDMOND HAS, UH, A LOT OF SOCIAL SAFETY NET TYPE PROGRAMS, BUT SHE OFTEN IS, UH, ONE OF THE FIRST CONTACTS.

UM, AND WHEN I WANT TO SPEAK SPECIFICALLY TO THE HOUSING ACTIVITIES PORTION, UM, OF THIS PROGRAM, AND, UH, WHILE THE 27,000, YOU KNOW, NUMBER, UH, CITIZENS, UH, SERVED INCLUDES ALL THE NONPROFIT ACTIVITIES, UM, I KNOW YOU ALL ARE USED TO DEALING WITH LARGE NUMBERS AND TO SEE 11 HOMES, UM, YOU KNOW, FOR THE, THE COST OF $400,000 OR SO.

UM, YOU KNOW, THAT'S MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF PROPERTY VALUE THAT'S PRESERVED, UM, BY AN INVESTMENT OF THIS.

AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HOMES THAT THIS KEEPS THEM STANDING UP.

AND SO WE HEAR A LOT ABOUT GENTRIFICATION, UH, REDEVELOPMENT.

I'M USUALLY HERE TALKING TO YOU ABOUT NEW DEVELOPMENT, BUT THIS IS THE BEST TOOL THAT THE CITY HAS, UM, TO PRESERVE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING THAT WE ALREADY HAVE HERE AND TO KEEP PEOPLE IN THEIR HOMES AND TO KEEP THOSE HOMES WORTH KEEPING FOR RENTERS, UM, OR FOR FOLKS WHO OWN THEIR HOMES, AGAIN, TO, TO KEEP THOSE FROM BEING GENTRIFIED.

UM, WHEN A HOME OF COURSE BECOMES TOO, TOO WORN OUT, UH, YOU KNOW, THE COST OF A ROOF, THE COST OF HVAC, UM, IS BEYOND THE CAPACITY OF A LOT OF THESE FOLKS.

UM, AND IT WOULD ABSOLUTELY RESULT IN EITHER LIVING IN DEPLORABLE CONDITIONS OR THOSE HOMES EVENTUALLY GOING OFF THE MARKET FOR SOME TYPE OF REDEVELOPMENT.

SO WE REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT.

UM, AND I JUST AGAIN, WANNA COMMEND CHRISTIE AND HER TEAM AND, UH, WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT SOME OF THE PROACTIVE THINGS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IN THE FUTURE WITH EDMUND BUILDS AS FAR AS TARGETING THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS WHERE WE KNOW REDEVELOPMENT AND GENTRIFICATION ARE GOING TO HAPPEN.

UM, AND WHAT WE CAN DO TO PRESERVE, AGAIN, THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING THAT WE ALREADY HAVE TO KEEP FOLKS FROM BEING PUSHED OUT.

TO ITEM C, A PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS RELATED TO THE SANTA FE AND MILL VALLEY EDITION, ALSO KNOWN AS KIND ENTERPRISES ARISE, WELL RESIDENCES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SANTA FE AVENUE, SOUTH OF EDMOND ROAD.

THANK YOU MR. BOY.

THANKS CODY.

ANYONE ELSE? WHAT WOULD Y'ALL LIKE TO DO? I'D ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ACCEPT THIS REPORT.

I MOVE TO APPROVE.

SECOND MAYOR, I HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND CAST YOUR VOTE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO ON

[C. Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of the Following Items Related to the Santa Fe & Mill Valley Addition, also known as Kind Enterprises-Arise Well Residences, Located on the East Side of Santa Fe Avenue, South of Edmond Road (Kind Enterprises; Ward 4): Case No. SP25-00012; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a Site Plan Application for the Santa Fe & Mill Valley Addition, also known as Kind Enterprises-Arise Well Residences, Located on the East Side of Santa Fe Avenue, South of Edmond Road; and Case No. PR25-00009; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a Preliminary Plat for the Santa Fe & Mill Valley Addition, also known as Kind Enterprises-Arise Well Residences, Located on the East Side of Santa Fe Avenue, South of Edmond Road; Said Public Hearings to Include Consideration of Approval of the Following Variances to Title 21, Subdivisions, and Title 22, Zoning Ordinance, of the Edmond Municipal Code for the Aforementioned Site Plan Application and Preliminary Plat: A Variance to Section 21.02.090(C), Lots, of the Edmond Municipal Code to Eliminate the Requirement for Dedication of a 25 Foot Sight Triangle; A Variance to Section 21.02.010(A)(5), Access Management, of the Edmond Municipal Code to Reduce the Driveway Separation Along Santa Fe Avenue from 325 Feet to 313 Feet from Mill Valley Boulevard and 193 Feet from Big Horn; A Variance to Section 22.6.1(E)(2)(b), Street Access, of the Edmond Municipal Code to Reduce the Driveway Separation Along Mill Valley Boulevard from 150 Feet to 141 Feet from Santa Fe Avenue; and A Variance to Section 21.03.070, Water Lines, of the Edmond Municipal Code to Allow the Construction of a Permanent Dead End Main.]

IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT.

MR. BRYANT, WOULD YOU, WOULD YOU SAVE ME SOME PAIN OF READING ALL OF THIS AND JUST START WALKING US THROUGH IT, PLEASE? ? YES SIR.

ZERO TO FOUR PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF BOTH THE SITE PLAN AND THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE VARIANCE TO THE WATER MAIN REQUIREMENT BE OMITTED.

UM, THESE ITEMS REQUIRE COUNSEL ACTION.

DUE TO VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED, WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT THE ITEMS AND THE ASSOCIATED VARIANCES BE VOTED ON SEPARATELY TO PROVIDE MORE CONSISTENCY WITH EXISTING PROCESSES, CLARITY FOR THE ITEMS THEMSELVES, AND FLEXIBILITY FOR SITUATIONS WHERE VARIANCE TO TITLE 21 OR 22 IS REQUESTED AS PART OF A PLAT OR SITE PLAN.

THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION PERTAINS TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES, SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SANTA FE AND MILL VALLEY.

YOU CAN SEE THAT HERE ON THE SCREEN.

UH, THE PLAN INCLUDES TWO PROPOSED BUILDINGS, APPROXIMATELY 9,200 SQUARE FEET EACH.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE PLATTED INTO TWO LOTS, ONE OF WHICH WILL BE A COMMON AREA FOR DETENTION.

THE FOLLOWING REQUESTED VARIANCES WERE HEARD BY PLANNING COMMISSION AT THEIR MEETING ON NOVEMBER 18TH, 2025.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY STANDARD, WHICH REQUIRED 25 FOOT SITE TRIANGLE AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILL VALLEY AND SANTA FE.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INSTALL STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE IN THIS AREA.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS VARIANCE BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE DRIVEWAY SEPARATION FROM 325 FEET TO 313 FEET FROM MILL VALLEY AND 193 FEET FROM BIGHORN OF THE DRIVEWAY LOCATED ON SANTA FE AVENUE.

PLANE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS VARIANCE BY A BOAT OF FOUR TO ZERO.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE DRIVEWAY SEPARATION FROM 150 FEET TO 141 FEET FROM SANTA FE FOR THE DRIVEWAY LOCATED ON MILL VALLEY.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS VARIANCE BY A VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO.

AND FINALLY, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A PERMANENT DEAD END WATER MAIN PLANNING COMMISSION.

[00:25:01]

I KNOW THAT WAS A LOT, SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PROCESS, I'M HAPPY TO TRY TO ANSWER THOSE AT THIS TIME.

QUESTIONS? I'VE GOT SEVERAL.

UM, I GUESS I CAN GET IT STARTED.

MAYBE IT'LL TRIGGER SOME OTHER THOUGHTS.

UM, LET'S FIRST TALK ABOUT THE, THE WATERLINE, THE DEAD END WATERLINE.

UM, AND COUNCIL, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED ZERO FOUR ON THAT ITEM, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT.

SO WHAT'S THE ALTERNATIVE ON THAT? UM, I BELIEVE THAT, UM, I, I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE.

I THINK MAYBE IT MIGHT BE APPROPRIATE TO HEAR FROM ENGINEERING AND THE APPLICANT ON CONCEPTS FOR HOW TO AVOID A DEAD END WATERLINE.

UM, I DON'T WANNA PRETEND TO BE AN EXPERT ON IT.

WE CAN, WE CAN COME BACK TO THAT.

UM, ALSO, I NOTED IN THE PACKET THAT THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH CUTTING THROUGH THE MEDIAN ON, WAS IT MILL VALLEY BOULEVARD AND WHAT WAS THE ISSUE THERE? UM, IN THE, WHEN THE ORIGINAL, UH, PUD WAS APPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT SPECIFICALLY, UH, ONE OF THE CONCEPTS WAS THAT THE, UH, THE APPLICANT TEAM WOULD TRY TO ACQUIRE, UH, PERMISSION TO CUT THROUGH THAT MEDIAN.

I BELIEVE IT'S, UM, THAT'S COMMON AREAS, UH, OWNED BY THE MILL VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, UM, SO THAT THEY COULD CONSTRUCT A FULL ACCESS DRIVE.

AND, UM, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THAT WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL.

THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO, TO RESET NEGOTIATION.

THE APPLICANT MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL DETAILS TO OFFER.

TERMINATE AT A SERVICE POINT AND A FIRE HYDRANT, WHICH WOULD HELP KEEP THE LINE FLUSHED AND UH, ELIMINATE THE MAINTENANCE.

ANYTHING ELSE THAT MR. BRYANT, BEFORE WE BRING THE APPLICANT UP? I'M NOT SURE WHO THIS ONE'S BEST FOR, BUT THE, I NOTICED THERE WAS A COMMENT ABOUT THE SIDE TRIANGLES JUST AT THAT CORNER AND TRYING TO MAKE THE, MAKE IT SO YOU COULD STILL SORT OF SEE AROUND THE CORNER.

I DUNNO IF IT'S IF THAT'S FOR YOU GUYS OR FOR YOU KEN, BUT JUST WANNA UNDERSTAND HOW THAT WAS GONNA WORK.

NO, THAT'S FOR OKAY.

WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING? ABSOLUTELY.

AND I CAN WATER, I'M DAVID JONES WITH THE ORION GROUP AT 2201 WOODHILL ROAD HERE IN EDMOND.

I'M THE ENGINEER FOR THE PROJECT.

AND SO ON THE WATER LINE, YES, THE, UH, THE CODE REQUIRES TYPICALLY THAT WE DESIGN THE LINE TO BE WITHIN FIFA OF THE PROPERTY LINES.

SO THE FUTURE CONNECTION COULD BE MADE AS TIME GOES ON.

WELL, IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, AND I UNDERSTAND THE ARGUMENT ON THE CITY'S BEHALF, THEY SEE THIS MORE SO AS A PERMANENT TYPE DEAD END LINE BECAUSE THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH HAS ALREADY OCCURRED.

SO THERE'S MOST LIKELY NOT AN OPTION OR A PERSON OR INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP THAT'S GOING TO CONNECT TO THAT LINE AND EXTEND IT ON.

SO THERE HAS BEEN, UM, MULTIPLE CONVERSATIONS BACK AND FORTH, UH, HERE RECENTLY, UH, WITH BOTH THE WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER MR. HUGGINS AND MR. LAWRENCE, THE CITY ENGINEER, ABOUT WHAT SOME OF THE OPTIONS WOULD BE.

SO WE'RE VERY, UH, UNDERSTANDING OF RIGHT NOW THE OPTION IS FOR US TO TAKE THE WATER LINE WHERE WE SHOW IT DEAD ENDING ON OUR NORTH PROPERTY LINE AND EXTENDING IT ON TO MAKE A CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING WATER LINE THAT IS ON SILVER FOX, UM, DRIVE JUST TO OUR NORTH AND THROUGH THE RIGHT OF WAY THERE.

SO THAT, UH, THAT BASICALLY THAT CONCEPT WOULD ELIMINATE THIS REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE AND THAT COULD BE ELIMINATED OFF OF THE DEAL.

NOW WHAT WE HAVE ALSO PROPOSED IS A, UH, ALTERNATIVE OPTION BECAUSE WE'VE GOT SOME ISSUES DOING THAT.

WE'VE GOT SOME FIBER OPTIC, WE'VE GOT TREES IN THAT RIGHT OF WAY THAT WE'LL HAVE TO, UM, ELIMINATE, UH, TO GET THAT WATER LINE THROUGH, UM, WHICH CAN BE DONE AND, AND WILL BE DONE IF THAT'S THE, UH, UM, DESIRE OF THE WATER RESOURCES GROUP.

IN THE END, WHAT WE'VE ALSO LOOKED AT NOW IS SHORTENING ACTUALLY THAT WATER LINE UP TO JUST THE NORTH SIDE OF OUR ENTRY DRIVE OFF OF SANTA FE, WHERE YOU SEE THE FIRE HYDRANT MAKING OUR SERVICE CONNECTION AT THAT POINT, RIGHT AT THE VERY END OF THE LINE THAT GOES INTO THE BUILDING.

UM, AND WITH THE DEMAND OF THE BUILDING, BOTH, UH, THE TENANTS, EACH BUILDING WILL HOLD 16 RESIDENTS AND TWO TO FOUR STAFF AT ANY GIVEN TIME THAT THE DEMAND OF THAT, UH, ALONG WITH THE LAUNDRY AND EVERYTHING ELSE WOULD UH, NEGATE THIS BEING DEFINED AS A DEAD END WATER LINE.

IT WOULD ACTUALLY

[00:30:01]

NOW THAT'S WHAT'S BEEN PROPOSED.

WHAT'S THE CITY IS ASKING FOR IS THE EXTENSION OF THE WATER LINE.

AND WE ARE OPEN AND WELCOME TO DO THAT WELCOMING TO DO THAT, UH, ON THE CITY'S BEHALF.

BUT IF WATER RESOURCES IS RECEPTIVE IN THE END TO US SHORTENING THE LINE INSTEAD, UM, THAT'S WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING AT THIS TIME.

SO WE UH, CAN PRETTY MUCH, I THINK, ELIMINATE THIS REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE.

'CAUSE ONE OF TWO THINGS ARE GONNA HAPPEN.

WE'RE EITHER GONNA GET THIS DEFINED AS A NONDEAD END LINE OR WE'RE GONNA EXTEND IT ON, UM, TO THE CITY'S SERVICE ALREADY ON SILVER FOX.

SO MY, MY CONCERN WITH IT AS A DEAD END IS THE AMOUNT OF WORK THAT IT PUTS ON OUR CITY STAFF LATER ON BECAUSE THEY'VE GOTTA KEEP COMING OUT AND FLUSHING THAT LINE PERIODICALLY.

YES.

UM, I KNOW THAT BECAUSE I SIT AT ONE OF THOSE DEAD ENDS AND THE SOLUTION THAT THE CITY CAME UP WITH 25 YEARS AGO WAS TO COME OUT AND FLUSH OUR FIRE HYDRANT IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE QUARTERLY.

RIGHT.

AND THEY'RE STILL DOING IT TODAY.

RIGHT.

AND UNFORTUNATELY THAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH IT.

WE WILL, WE WILL HAVE A SOLUTION TO ELIMINATE THAT DEAD END AS YOU SEE IT DESIGNED IN THAT PLAN THERE.

IT WILL EITHER BE EXTENDED TO MAKE THAT TAP AND LOOPED TO THAT LINE ON SILVER FOX OR IT WILL BE SHORTENED AND THE SERVICE LINE PUT AT THE VERY END OF IT TO KEEP THAT LINE WORKING AND FLUSHED AND THERE WILL BE NO DEAD SPACE BETWEEN ONE POINT AND ANOTHER WHERE WATER WOULD SIT IT, THAT LINE ALSO GRADES ALL THE WAY BACK TO MILL VALLEY ROAD.

SO IF IT WERE TO EVER NEED TO BE SHUT DOWN OR ISOLATED FOR ANY PERIOD OF TIME, THAT WATER WOULDN'T SIT IN THAT LINE.

IT WILL ACTUALLY FLOAT BACK TOWARDS THIS CONNECTION POINT THERE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MILL VALLEY.

CAN YOU TALK TO THE SIGN CONCEPT ON THE CORNER? OH YES, YES.

UM, AND BE ABLE TO SEE, SO WE, UM, WE, WE HAD SEVERAL MEETINGS ABOUT, UH, ALL THE OTHER THREE VARIANCES ALSO, UH, WITH BOTH THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND THE ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW DEPARTMENT.

THE, UH, THE WAY THIS IS SET UP RIGHT NOW IS WE'RE GRANTING, UM, 70 FOOT AN AN ADDITIONAL 20 FOOT OF RIGHT OF WAY.

SO FROM THE WAY THIS IS DESIGNED AND CONFIGURED RIGHT NOW, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE STOPPING POINT IS WELL IN ADVANCE IN FRONT OF THE, UH, DETENTION FACILITY.

A, UH, EVENT IS WHY WE HAVE IT AND WHY IT'S LAID OUT LIKE IT IS.

THE DETENTION FACILITY IS ALSO AT GRADE, UM, IN THAT CORNER BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THE DETENTION IS, IS OBVIOUSLY ALSO THE LOWEST POINT ON THE PROPERTY UHHUH.

SO FROM A VEHICULAR STANDPOINT, THERE'S NOT A REGRADING OR AN EXTENSION UP THAT WOULD HELP BLOCK VIEW BECAUSE WE DO HAVE A CROWN POINT ON SANTA FE JUST TO THE NORTH OF US.

RIGHT.

SO, UM, FROM THAT STANDPOINT, THAT BECAME VERY, VERY RELEVANT DISCUSSION BETWEEN US AND STAFF ON THAT POINT.

AND BASED UPON THE DESIGN AND THE ELEVATION STAFF IS, UH, VERY ACCEPTING OF THAT LOCATION AND THE ELIMINATION OF THAT 25 FOOT SITE TRAINING.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT, THE MEDIAN AND THE CUT THROUGH AND WHAT HAPPENED THERE? AND I CAN, I CAN SPEAK A LITTLE BIT TO THAT.

UH, THAT REALLY FELL TO THE DEVELOPERS, UH, COUNCIL, UH, IN THE DISCUSSIONS WITH, UH, THE, UH, MILL VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, WHICH I UNDERSTAND, UM, WERE NOT EVER RECIPROCATED.

UM, THEY COULD NOT LOCATE OR IDENTIFY A ACTIVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OR BOARD OR INDIVIDUALS.

AND SO THAT'S KIND OF HOW THAT, UM, GOT US TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY.

NO, NO MEDIAN CUT THROUGH THAT AREA.

IT IS, UH, IS CAN, UH, RELAYED.

IT IS A, UH, COMMON AREA OWNED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS.

IT'S NOT PUBLICLY DEDICATED TO THE CITY.

SO THE CITY DOESN'T HAVE THAT AUTHORITY TO ALLOW THAT.

IT IS LANDSCAPED AND VE VEGETATED.

AND SO, UM, IT'S, IT'S PROBLEMATIC.

WE, UH, WE PUT IT AND WORKED WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ON ACCESSIBILITY AND MAKING SURE THAT ALL OF OUR TURNING RADIUSES, UH, YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THEY'RE KIND OF, UM, LARGER THAN TYPICAL, UH, ON THAT ROAD TO MAKE SURE THAT UH, FIREFIGHTING APP APPARATUS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO NEGOTIATE THOSE TURNS AND GET INTO THE SITE.

UM, THESE ARE, UM, NON, MOSTLY NON-AMBULATORY TO A LARGE DEGREE.

THIS IS AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, UM, EACH WITH 16 BEDS.

SO THE NEED FOR TWO ACCESS POINTS IN CASE ONE WERE TO BE, UM, UNUSABLE DURING

[00:35:01]

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE YOU'D LIKE TO TELL US? NO, SIR.

NOT THAT I'M WILLING TO ANSWER ANY MORE QUESTIONS.

WHY DON'T WE SEE IF ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ISSUE? IF YOU WOULD PLEASE COME FORWARD.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

TAYLOR WILSON.

I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT YOU FOLLOW WHAT THE STAFF AND SUPPORT YOUR STAFF BY DENYING THE WATER STUBBING EXEMPTION.

ANYONE ELSE? ALRIGHT.

SCENE NONE.

STAFF HAS RECOMMENDED THAT WE TAKE SIX DIFFERENT MOTIONS TO WORK OUR WAY THROUGH THIS.

UH, THE FIRST MOTION WOULD BE TO A MOTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO SECTION 21.02090 C, LOTS OF THE EDMOND MUNICIPAL CODE TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR DEDICATION OF A 25 FOOT SITE TRIANGLE.

FOR CASE NUMBERS SP 25 DASH 0 0 2 AND PR 25 DASH 0 0 0 9.

SO WE APPROVE VARIANCES BEFORE THE PLAT OR THE SITE PLAN.

DOES IT MATTER? I AM TAKING 'EM IN ORDER OF THIS LIST.

THAT IS CORRECT? YES.

I'LL, UM, MOTION TO APPROVE WHAT YOU JUST SAID.

THAT WOULD BE NINE C.

IT'S JUST THE BULLET NINE C.

FIRST BULLET VARIANCE ACTION ONE.

FIRST VARIANCE.

I HAVE A MOTION SECOND AND A SECOND.

THE TRIANGLE SITE TRIANGLE VARIANCE JUST TO BE CLEAR.

THE SECOND MOTION RECOMMENDED IS A MOTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO SECTION 20.020 A FIVE.

ACCESS MANAGEMENT OF THE EDMOND MUNICIPAL CODE TO REDUCE THE DRIVEWAY SEPARATION ALONG SANTA FE AVENUE FROM 325 FEET TO 313 FEET FROM MILL VALLEY BOULEVARD AND 193 FEET FROM BIGHORN.

FOR CASE NUMBERS SP 25 DASH 0 0 0 1 2 AND PR 25 DASH 0 0 9.

MOTION TO APPROVE.

SECOND I HAVE MOTION AND A SECOND.

PASS YOUR VOTE.

THIRD ONE IS MOTION TO PROVE VARIANCE TO SECTION 22.6 0.1 E TWO B STREET ACCESS OF THE EDMUND MUNICIPAL CODE TO REDUCE THE DRIVEWAY SEPARATION FROM MILL VALLEY BOULEVARD FROM 150 FEET TO 141 FEET FROM SANTA FE AVENUE.

FOR CASE NUMBERS S SP 25 DASH 0 0 0 1 2 AND PR TWO FIVE DASH 0 0 0 9 YOU HAD TO TAKE A DEEP BREATH BEFORE THAT ONE.

HUH? I DID.

MOTION TO SECOND.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

THE NEXT ONE IS A MOTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO SECTIONS 21.03070 WATERLINES OF THE EDMOND MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PERMANENT DEAD END MAIN FOR CASE NUMBERS S SP 25 DASH 0 0 0 1 2 AND PR 25 0 0 0 0 9.

MOTION TO APPROVE.

MOVE APPROVAL MAYOR SECOND.

THAT MOTION FAILS.

ZERO FIVE.

NEXT ONE IS A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR CASE NUMBER SP 25 DASH 0 0 0 1 2 WITH VARIANCES TO SECTIONS 21.0 2.9 C 21 2 A 5 22 6 E TWO B AND 21.037 AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED THIS EVENING, REMOVING ANY YES MA'AM.

WHICH ONE DO I NEED TO MARK OUT? 2103.

SO LET ME RESTATE THAT MOTION TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR CASE NUMBER SP 25 DASH 0 0 2 WITH VARIANCES TO SECTIONS 21.0290 C 21.0 2.010 A 5 22 0.61 E TWO B AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED THIS EVENING,

[00:40:02]

I HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND.

I'M GONNA HOG ALL CAST YOUR VOTE.

ALRIGHT, MOTION PASSES.

AND FINALLY WE NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION CASE NUMBER PR TWO FIVE DASH 0 0 0 9 WITH VARIANCES TO SECTIONS 21.0 2.090 C 21.0 2.0 A FIVE AND 22.6 0.1 E TWO B AS WITH, UH, AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED THIS EVENING, DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE? SECOND.

WE'RE NOW ON TO ITEM

[10. Executive Sessions and Action Items:]

10, EXECUTIVE SESSION.

AND ACTION ITEMS. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ENTER INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

SO MOVED.

MOTION PASSES WHERE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION WILL BE BACK.

MR. MOORE, YOU NORMALLY MAKE THIS, UH, MOTION FOR US TO COME OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO? MR. MAYOR, I'M MAKING THAT VERY MOTION TO COME OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION.

I WILL SECOND THAT MOTION.