* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [1. Call to Order of the Edmond Planning Commission.] [00:00:04] ALL RIGHT, GOOD EVENING. WE WILL START THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, UH, OF MARCH OR TUESDAY, MARCH 3RD, 2026. IT'S CALLED ORDER [2. General Consent Items: Items listed under General Consent are usually approved as a group with the proper motion from a member of the Planning Commission. Members of the Planning Commission may pull any item under General Consent for separate discussion and/or action.] FIRST. UH, WE'LL GO TO THE GENERAL CONSENT ITEM. DO THERE ARE TWO GENERAL CONSENT ITEMS. DO ANY COMMISSIONERS WANT TO PULL AN ITEM FOR DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION? SEEING NONE. LOOKING FOR A, UH, MOTION AND A SECOND MOTION? DO WE HAVE A MOTION? SECOND AND A SECOND BY A VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO. THE GENERAL CONSENT, UH, AGENDA IS APPROVED AND IS DONE HERE TONIGHT. MOVING ON TO THE AGENDA. ITEM FOUR, PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. [A. Case No. SP24-00018; Public Hearing and Consideration of approval of a Site Plan application for Edmond U-Haul Storage Building, located at 913 South Broadway. (Amerco Real Estate Company; Ward 3) **This item is being continued to the April 7, 2026 Planning Commission hearing by request of the applicant. ** ] SO CASE NUMBER, THE AGENDA FOUR, A CASE NUMBER SP TWO FOUR DASH 0 0 0 1 8 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE EDMUND U-HAUL STORAGE BUILDING LOCATED AT NINE 13 SOUTH BROADWAY. MR. BRIAN, WILL YOU, OR I'M SORRY, IS THE, UH, APPLICANT HERE? I DON'T BELIEVE THAT. OH, I'M SORRY. UH, THAT'S RIGHT. WE ARE, UH, THIS ITEM IS ACTUALLY REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE THROUGH THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. SO HEARING, UH, ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OR LOOKING FOR A MOTION, A SECOND TO CONTINUE THAT MOTION. MOTION TO CONTINUE. WE HAVE A MOTION SECOND, SECOND, AND A SECOND BY A VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO THAT IS APPROVED TO CONTINUE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 7TH, 2026. [B. Case No. DD24-00007; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Lot Split for 330 W 1st Street, located on the southeast corner of 1st and Walnut. (Castle Custom Homes LLC; Ward 1)] MOVING ON TO FOUR B, CASE NUMBER DD 24 DASH 0 0 0 0 7 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A LOT SPLIT FOR THREE 30 WEST FIRST STREET LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FIRST AND WALNUT. UH, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. MR. BRIAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? YES. THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS LOT SPLIT IS APPROXIMATELY 7,000 SQUARE FEET. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FIRST AND WALNUT. THIS APPLICATION IS TO DIVIDE THE EXISTING LOT INTO TWO LOTS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVED IN APRIL, 2025. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE LAST SPLIT APPLICATION. THANK YOU. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF CITY STAFF? OKAY, HEARING NONE FROM THE APPLICANT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO QUESTIONS OF COMMISSIONERS. SO COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CITY STAFF OR THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE, WE'LL MOVE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK FOR AND AGAINST, FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? IF SEE IF SO, PLEASE COME TO THE DS. LAST CHANCE. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON AGENDA ITEM FOUR B. I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND, WE HAVE A SECOND BY VOTE OF FOUR TO ZERO A MOTION THAT AGENDA ITEM IS APPROVED AND MOVES ON TO CITY COUNCIL. UH, CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 23RD, 2026. THANK YOU. MOVING [C. Case No. SP23-00016; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Site Plan Extension for LifeChurch Central Campus Expansion – Parking Garage, located on the east side of I-35, south of 2nd Street. (Olsson; Ward 2)] ON TO AGENDA ITEM FOUR C. CASE NUMBER SP 23 DASH 0 0 0 1 16 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN EXTENSION FOR LIFE CHURCH CENTRAL CAMPUS EXPANSION PARKING GARAGE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF I 35 SOUTH OF SECOND STREET IS THE APPLICANT HERE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. BRIAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? YES, THIS SHOULD BE A SHORT ONE. THANK YOU. THIS REQUEST IS FOR AN EXTENSION OF A SITE PLAN INITIALLY APPROVED IN NOVEMBER, 2023. NO CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE EXTENSION REQUEST. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE EXTENSION. UM, YOU CAN SEE THE LOCATION HERE ON THE MAP NEAR THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON I 35, JUST SOUTH OF SECOND STREET. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF CITY STAFF? HEARING NONE. WE'LL MOVE ON TO QUESTIONS OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF CITY STAFF OR OF THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME. SEEING NONE. PUBLIC COMMENTS, DOES ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT THAT'S IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT NOW AND PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. MOTION SECOND BY A VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO THAT IS APPROVED AND IS, UH, CONCLUDED HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. [D. Case No. Z25-00031; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Rezoning from “A” Single-Family to “B” Two-family for 208 E 5th Street, located on the south side of 5th, east of Boulevard. (Tyler Burns; Ward 1)] MOVING ON TO FOUR D CASE NUMBER Z TWO FIVE DASH 0 0 0 3 1 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF REZONING FROM A SINGLE FAMILY TO B TWO TWO FAMILY FOR 2 0 8 EAST FIFTH STREET LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FIFTH EAST OF BOULEVARD. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. AND MR. BRIAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? YES. THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS ZONING [00:05:01] MAP AMENDMENT IS APPROXIMATELY 7,500 SQUARE FEET. YOU CAN SEE ON THE MAP THIS SHOWS THE LOCATION AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FIFTH AND BOULEVARD. NEARBY ZONING AND USES INCLUDE TO THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTH ARE ZONE FOUR AND DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES TO THE WEST. IS ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES AND IS CURRENTLY USED AS AN OVERFLOW PARKING LOT FOR THE BUSINESSES ACROSS THE STREET TO THE WEST. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A BY RIGHT ZONING DISTRICT, WHICH ALLOWS RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES INCLUDING TWO FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. THE LOT IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY A DUPLEX AND THIS ZONING MAP AMENDMENT WILL ELIMINATE THE EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY. THE EDMOND PLAN CATEGORIZES THIS AREA AS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE REQUESTED DISTRICT IS APPROPRIATE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF CITY STAFF? NO, THEY DO NOT. SO MOVE ON TO QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OF CITY STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS, DOES ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PRO? THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENT IS CLOSED. MOVING ON TO A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR AGENDA ITEM FOUR D. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION SECOND AND A SECOND BY A VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO THAT IS [E. Case No. SP26-00003; Public Hearing and Consideration of Site Plan approval for Gardenia Apartments, located on the north side of Ayers Avenue, west of Bryant Avenue. (DAP Ventures, LLC; Ward 1) ] APPROVED AND WE'LL MOVE ON TO CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 23RD, 2026. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO AGENDA ITEM FOUR E, CASE NUMBER S SP TWO SIX DASH 0 0 0 0 3 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE GARDENIA APARTMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AYERS AVENUE, WEST OF BRYAN AVENUE AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE. AND MR. BRYAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? YES. THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS SITE PLAN IS APPROXIMATELY 4.3 ACRES. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HEIRS JUST EAST OF BLACK WELDER. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED, ZONED TO ALLOW BOTH THE USE AND THE DENSITY BY RIGHT. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DETAILS, THREE BUILDINGS APPROXIMATELY 30,400 SQUARE FEET EACH WITH A TOTAL OF 69 DWELLING UNITS. ACCESS WILL BE FROM AIRS. THE ELEVATION SHOWS THE BUILDINGS TO BE JUST UNDER 35 FEET TALL AT THEIR HIGHEST POINT. THE FACADE WILL CONSIST OF BRICK AND CEMENT BOARD IN ADDITION TO EDMOND'S ADOPTED SITE PLAN STANDARDS. THIS APPLICATION ALSO INCLUDES DESIGN DETAILS AGREED TO BY THE PREVIOUS OWNER. SPECIFICALLY, DETENTION WILL BE LOCATED ON THE EAST OR WEST PORTION OF THE SITE. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES WILL BE LOCATED ON THE EAST OR WEST PORTION OF THE SITE. ACCESS WILL ONLY BE TAKEN FROM AIRS. A 30 FOOT BUFFER WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. AN EIGHT FOOT TALL MASONRY FENCE WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. ADDITIONAL TREES WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE IN A MATTER TO ENSURE SUSTAINED SCREENING. EXTERIOR MATERIALS WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. NO HVAC FACILITIES WILL BE ALLOWED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. BUILDINGS ABUTTING. THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 35 FEET. THE APPLICANT TEAM HAS SOME ADDITIONAL DESIGN DETAILS TO SHARE WITH THE COMMISSION. THESE REFINEMENTS WILL BE COMPLETE INCLUDED IN THEIR SUBSEQUENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS SUCH AS BUILDING PERMITS. THANK YOU MR. BRIAN, THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION. SURE, BRIEFLY, DAVID BOX 5 2 5 NORTHWEST 11TH STREET. UM, SO THIS SITE PLAN WAS DEEMED DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION BASED ON A TWO TO VOTE APPEALED UP CITY COUNCIL. CITY COUNCIL DENIED IT. UM, BEGAN WORKING WITH STAFF IN AN EFFORT TO, TO ALLOW THIS PROJECT TO MOVE FORWARD. WE THINK IT'S A PROJECT THAT'S, UH, IMPORTANT TO EDMOND. UM, WE WENT BACK, STARTED MEETING WITH THE NEIGHBORS TO TRY TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT BASED UPON SOME CONCERNS AS STAFF READ, THERE ARE, UH, THERE WERE ALREADY PRE NINE PREVIOUS CONDITIONS PLACED UPON, UH, THIS MATTER WHEN IT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN 2018 BY THE CITY COUNCIL. UM, AGAIN, THIS IS A SITE PLAN MATTER, BUT GIVEN THAT WE HAVE SOME TIMING ISSUES, WE THOUGHT AT BEST TO TRY TO FIND A SOLUTION WITH THE NEIGHBORS. WHAT WAS JUST HANDED OUT TO YOU, UH, ARE CONDITIONS THAT WE WISH TO IMPOSE UPON THIS APPLICATION, WHICH, UH, MR. ZZA WHO WAS AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING BELIEVES THAT WHEN EVERYBODY LEFT, THE NEIGHBORS WERE UH, SATISFIED WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE CONDITIONS. WE DID OFFER TO SLIDE THE BUILDING FURTHER AWAY FROM THAT NORTH PROPERTY LINE. IT IS WORTH NOTING IT IS ALREADY 88 FEET AWAY. UH, MY INDICATION FROM MARK IS THAT THESE EIGHT CONDITIONS WERE, UH, WAS THE PREFERENCE RATHER THAN SLIDING THAT BUILDING. SO, UH, JUST FOR PURPOSES OF THE RECORD, I'LL, I'LL READ THEM IN AND WHAT WE'D BE ASKING YOU TO DO THIS EVENING IS TO, UH, APPROVE THE SITE PLAN WITH THESE EIGHT ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS. AND SO, UH, ONE EVERGREEN PLANTINGS ALONG THE NORTH THAT ARE A MINIMUM OF 11 TO 12 FEET IN HEIGHT AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. TWO AT A MINIMUM TREES AND UNDERBRUSH WITHIN [00:10:01] THE NORTH 20 FEET OF THE SITE SHALL BE PRESERVED. THREE, ENCLOSING THE THIRD FLOOR BALCONIES AND BREEZEWAYS FOR THE NORTH BUILDING, FACING NORTH. FOUR EIGHT FOOT MASONRY WALL FROM THE WEST RETAINING WALL TO THE EAST RETAINING WALL WITH WEEP HOLES, NOT TO NOT OBSTRUCT THE NATURAL FLOW OF WATER. FIVE. ADDITION OF AWNINGS OVER THE TOP PORTION OF THE WINDOWS OF ON THE THIRD FLOOR OF THE NORTHERNMOST BUILDING. SIX. THE TOP OF BERM WITHIN THE EASEMENT ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE SHALL REMAIN. SEVEN REVISED PLANS BE PROVIDED TO NEIGHBORS AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. AND FINALLY, EIGHT, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF EDMOND PUBLIC WORKS, THE WATER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE DIVERTED SOUTH OF THE EXISTING BANK. SO WITH THAT, OUR UNDERSTANDING IS, UM, IS THAT THE NEIGHBORS ARE SATISFIED WITH THOSE CHANGES AND WE WOULD ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL AND WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. QUESTIONS OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE APPLICANT OR OF CITY STAFF AT THIS TIME? AND SO JUST FOR CLARITY, MR. BOX. SO THE, THE BERM REMIND ME OF, SO HOW DO YOU DO A MASONRY FENCE AND THE BERM, SIR, YOU IS THE MASONRY OFFSET FROM THE BERM? I WAS JUST CURIOUS AT A REAL, JUST REAL QUICK. SURE. NO, UH, MARKS. IT'S, UH, WHEN HE SHARED AN AVENUE WITH JOHNSON AND ASSOCIATES. UH, SO THERE IS A RETAINING WALL THAT, UH, IS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES. OKAY. THAT WILL BE, UH, SOUTH OF THE BERM. SO WE'RE GONNA USE THE MASONRY WALL TO CONNECT THE RETAINING WALLS AND THAT WE WENT OUT ON SITE, UH, THE ENGINEERING TEAM MET WITH THE NEIGHBORS AND WE WALKED THROUGH THAT. UH, THERE WAS CONCERN ABOUT WHERE EXISTING WATER WAS GOING. RIGHT. SO IN ADDITION TO DIVERTING, IT WAS MOVE THE MASONRY WALL SOUTH AS TO NOT FURTHER TAKEOUT TREES AND TO PROTECT THAT BERM. SO IT WOULDN'T BE A PROPERTY LINE, IT'S GONNA, YOU'RE GONNA BE SOUTH ONTO YOUR PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH PART OF THE BERM? CORRECT. SO IT DOESN'T BE OKAY. GOTCHA. AND I, I KNOW THE NEIGHBORS ARE HERE AND THEY, THEY CAN SPEAK TO THAT. WE TALKED ABOUT THE OPTION OF PUTTING THAT MASONRY WALL ON THE PROPERTY LINE. ULTIMATELY WITH THE FOOTINGS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED. THERE WOULD BE ADDITIONAL TREES THAT HAD TO BE TAKEN OUT AND THEY CAN CONFIRM. I DON'T WANNA SPEAK FOR THEM, BUT, UH, IT SOUNDED LIKE THIS WAS THE PREFERABLE OPTION, WHICH IS WHY IT WAS WRITTEN. OKAY. IN FROM THE DEVELOPER. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF COMMISSIONERS AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE MOVE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. AND AS A REMINDER, UH, THIS IS A OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC, SO YOU GUYS TO ASK QUESTIONS OF THE CHAIR OF THE COMMISSION. SO ASK ME QUESTIONS AND ONCE WE GET ALL THE QUESTIONS FROM EVERYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK, WE WILL THEN TRY TO GET ANSWERS FROM THE APPLICANT. SO THANK YOU. MORNING OR AFTERNOON. I'M GARY BARTLEY. I'M AT 1209 NICE BRIDGE ROAD, WHICH WAS IN THE ORIGINAL NOTIFICATION AREA. UH, I WANT TO COMMEND THE, UH, TWO PARTIES THAT MARK ZITTAU WITH THE URBAN PLANNER AND THEN DENTON PARKER FOR REACHING OUT TO US AS NEIGHBORS TO GIVE US A CHANCE TO SIT DOWN AND DISCUSS THE ISSUES THAT WE DID HAVE ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION AND WHERE IT WAS GONNA HAPPEN HAPPEN AND HOW IT WAS GONNA HAPPEN. AND THE, UH, EIGHT ITEMS THAT MR. BOX PRESENTED ARE THE ONES THAT WE HAD, UH, INITIALLY TALKED ABOUT AND ULTIMATELY SAID THIS, IF WE DO THIS, IT WILL TAKE CARE OF 99% OF OUR CONCERNS. NOT ALL OF 'EM, BUT THAT'S ALL RIGHT. UH, WE FEEL AT THIS POINT THAT IF THEY, THEY COULD, UH, STAY WITHIN WHAT THEY WERE PROMISED TO DO AND, UH, WE'VE AGREED TO THAT, THAT, UH, THE PROJECT SHOULD GO AHEAD. I, I PERSONALLY FEEL THAT I, I CAN ENDORSE IT AT THIS POINT IN TIME. SO I DO APPRECIATE THE TAKING THAT EXTRA STEP TO BEAT WITH US AND TO, UH, LOOK AT WHAT WE WERE REALLY CONCERNED WITH, PARTICULARLY THE ONSITE VISITATION OF THE, OF THE PROJECTS. OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HELLO, NICOLE PETERSON, 1204 KNIGHT BRIDGE ROAD. MY PROPERTY'S LOCATED DIRECTLY BEHIND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. UM, WE DID HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH THE DEVELOPER AND HIS ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL TEAM AND THEY ALSO WERE GRACIOUS ENOUGH TO MEET WITH US ON SITE. UM, I REALLY AM HAPPY THAT WE WERE ABLE TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT AND WE, WITH THESE EIGHT CHANGES, CAN SUPPORT THIS PROJECT MOVING FORWARD. I HOPE THAT THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHER NEIGHBORS AND DEVELOPERS TO SEE THAT YOU CAN COME TOGETHER AND COME AND FIND SOLUTIONS THAT ARE WORKABLE FOR EVERYBODY. UM, SO WE APPRECIATE THE DEVELOPER AND HIS TEAM FOR COMING UP WITH THESE SOLUTIONS AND WORKING WITH US. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK FOR, AGAINST THIS PROJECT AT THIS TIME? LAST CHANCE. ALL RIGHT. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE ITEM PRESENTED, INCLUDING THE EIGHT ITEMS THAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO US, UM, UP HERE. SO THIS WILL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THAT [00:15:01] IS WHAT THE COMMISSIONERS WISH TO DO, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE EIGHT. THANK. I'LL SECOND. THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND SECOND BY A VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO THAT IS APPROVED HERE TONIGHT AND IT IS ACTUALLY, UH, FINISHED HERE TONIGHT. SO THANK YOU GUYS. [F. Case No. SP24-00017; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a Site Plan for Edmond Police Training Center, located at 7707 East Danforth Road. (City of Edmond; Ward 2) ] UM, MOVING ON TO UH, AGENDA ITEM FOUR F. CASE NUMBER SP 24 DASH 0 0 0 1 7 PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION FOR A APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE EDMUND POLICE TRAINING FACILITY LOCATED AT 7 7 0 7 EAST DANFORTH ROAD. IS THE APPLICANT HERE. PERFECT. THANK YOU GUYS. AND MR. BRIAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? YES. THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS SITE PLAN IS APPROXIMATELY 13.6 ACRES. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION NEAR DANFORTH AND MIDWEST. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DETAILS, ONE BUILDING APPROXIMATELY 12,400 SQUARE FEET AND ONE BUILDING APPROXIMATELY 300 SQUARE FEET. ACCESS WILL BE FROM THE EXISTING DRIVE ON DANFORTH ELEVATION, SHOWED THE LARGER BUILDING TO BE 29 FEET TALL AT ITS HIGHEST POINT AND THE SMALLER BUILDING TO BE 15 FEET TALL AT ITS HIGHEST POINT, THE FACADES WILL CONSIST OF BRICK AND PRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD ANYTHING TO THE CITY'S PRESENTATION? ALRIGHT, THANK YOU GUYS. LOOKING FORWARD QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS FOR CITY STAFF OR THE APPLICANT? HEARING NONE. MOVING TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. DOES ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROP OR THIS AGENDA ITEM IN THE PUBLIC? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED AND LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON AGENDA. ITEM FOUR F. MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE SECOND AND A SECOND BY A VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO THAT IS APPROVED AND IS DONE HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. MOVING ON DOWN THE AGENDA AS CITIZENS' COMMENTS. DOES ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK ABOUT AGENDA, ABOUT PLANNING COMMISSION RELATED MATTERS BUT NOT ON THE AGENDA SEEING THEM CITIZENS' COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. [6. Comments from the Planning Commission Chair and Members.] ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR OR MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION? I DO NOT HAVE ANY. THERE'S ANY PLANNING COMMISSIONERS? WE HAVE ONE. MR. BRIAN? UM, YES, THANK YOU. I JUST WANTED TO REMIND, UH, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AND THE COMMISSIONERS THAT WE ARE CONTINUING OUR, UH, SERIES OF OPEN HOUSES TO THE PUBLIC ON THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. UM, THE NEXT OPPORTUNITY IS WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11 FROM 8:00 AM TO 1:00 PM AND THAT'S RIGHT HERE IN CITY HALL IN THE MAIN STREET CONFERENCE ROOM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IT'S IMPORTANT IF YOU CAN MAKE IT BE GREAT. SO MOVING ON TO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? THANK YOU. IF NOT LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND TO ADJOURN THE MEETING MOTION. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND AND WE ARE APPROVED AND ADJOURNED. THANK YOU. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.