* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:04] ALL RIGHT, [1. Call to Order of the Edmond Planning Commission.] GOOD EVENING. WE WILL CALL TO ORDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 21ST, 2026. ORDER. FIRST [2. Consideration of Approval of Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes: April 07, 2026.] ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS OUR, LET'S SEE THE CONSENT FOR OUR MEETINGS, THE APPROVAL OF THE, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION, REGULAR MEETINGS OF APRIL 7TH, 2026. COMMISSIONERS, PLEASE REVIEW THE MINUTES AND LEMME KNOW IF THERE'S ANY CHANGES OR AMENDMENTS. IF NOT LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. I'LL MAKE SECOND. UH, YEAH, SECOND. MAKE A MOTION, OR, SORRY, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. YEAH, I THINK THEY BOTH. OH, HE, I THINK HE WAS THE FIRST. YEAH. HOW'D RYAN CHAPMAN VOTE. HEY, YOU HAVEN'T SWITCHED . THIS, THIS MEETING'S STARTING OFF ROUGH. SHOULD WE CALL VOTE NO? DO I NEED TO GET ANOTHER CLICKER? YEAH. YEAH, WE NEED TO DO THAT. YEAH. JUST DO YOU ME TO DO THAT. OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED SAY NAY. MOTION IS CARRIED AND APPROVED. MOVING ON TO THE PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA CASE NUMBER THREE A AND THREE B WILL BE HEARD JOINTLY, BUT WE WILL TAKE SEPARATE VOTES. UM, [A. Case No. PR25-00025; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Preliminary Plat for The Oaks at Covell, located northeast of Sooner and Covell. (The Orion Group; Ward 2)] CASE NUMBER THREE. A IS CASE NUMBER PR TWO FIVE DASH 0 0 0 2 5 PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OAKS AT COVE. AND AGENDA ITEM THREE B IS CASE NUMBER PR TWO FIVE DASH 0 0 0 2 3. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR A FINAL PLAT OF THE OAKS OF COVEL. MR. BRIAN, WILL WE PRESENT ITEMS THREE A AND THREE B? YES, SIR. THANK YOU. ON THREE A, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT IS APPROXIMATELY 6.7 ACRES. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION ON THE EAST SIDE OF SU, ALMOST HALF A MILE NORTH OF COVE. THE CASE DETAILS ARE AS FOLLOWS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE PLATTED INTO ONE LOT ACCESS WILL BE PROVIDED BY ONE DRIVEWAY ON SOONER AND MAY EVENTUALLY CONNECT TO THE SOUTH AND EAST AS THE LEGACY AT COVELL IS BUILT OUT. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. ITEM THREE B [B. Case No. PR25-00023; Consideration of Approval for a Final Plat for The Oaks at Covell, located northeast of Sooner and Covell. (The Orion Group; Ward 2) ] IS THE COMPANION ITEM, THE FINAL PLAT TO THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, AND THE FINAL PLAT CONFORMS TO THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THAT AS WELL. THANK YOU. MR. BRIAN. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? YES. THANK YOU. ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD TO MR. BRYAN'S PRESENTATION? NO, I THINK MR. BRYAN DID A GREAT JOB. I'M DAVID JONES WITH THE ORION GROUP AND BE WILLING TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT THE COUNCIL, OR EXCUSE ME, THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE COMMISSIONERS, OF CITY STAFF OR OF THE APPLICANT? HEARING NONE. MOVING TO PUBLIC COMMENTS, ANYBODY IN THE, UH, IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? IF SO, PLEASE COME TO THE DAYS DURING THE PODIUM. SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. I'LL MAKE A MOTION. I WILL SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. THIS WILL BE FOR, I'M SORRY. THIS IS, THIS IS SPECIFICALLY TO ITEM THREE A IS WHAT THIS MOTION IS. SECOND IS FOR, AND THIS VOTE MOTION THREE A OR ITEM AGENDA THREE A IS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO. NOW LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON AGENDA ITEM THREE B. I'LL MAKE A MOTION. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO. ITEM NUMBER THREE, B IS APPROVED. ITEM NUMBER THREE A IS DONE TONIGHT. ITEM NUMBER THREE, B MOVES ON TO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 11TH, 2026. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MOVING DOWN THE AGENDA, WE HAVE [C. Case No. PR24-00013; Consideration of Approval for a Final Plat for Honeyfield Phase I, located southeast of Kelly and Covell. (Broadway Development Group; Ward 1)] ITEM THREE C, CASE NUMBER PR 24 DASH 0 0 0 1 3, CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR A FINAL PLAT OF THE HONEY FIELD, PHASE ONE LOCATED IN SOUTHEAST KELLY AND COVELL. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? YES, SIR. THANK YOU. MR. BRIAN, WILL WE PRESENT? YES. THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS FINAL PLAT IS APPROXIMATELY 16.6 ACRES. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COVELL, EAST OF KELLY. CASE DETAILS ARE AS FOLLOWS, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE PLATTED INTO ONE LOT ACCESS WILL BE PROVIDED BY TWO CONNECTIONS ON COVEL, ONE THAT ALIGNS WITH VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE AND ONE THAT ALIGNS WITH SHORT GRASS ROAD. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT A SIGNAL AT SHORTGRASS AND COVEL WILL BE WARRANTED. THE APPLICANT WOULD PREFER TO INSTALL THE SIGNAL AT A LATER PHASE OF THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. HOWEVER, THEY'VE NOT PROVIDED A PLAN THAT DEMONSTRATES WHEN THE SIGNAL WOULD BE INSTALLED, FOR EXAMPLE, USING A MEASURABLE OUTCOME [00:05:01] OR MILESTONE. FURTHER DISCUSSION REGARDING CONDITIONS MAY BE APPROPRIATE DURING THIS HEARING. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT, INCLUDING THAT THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT SHORTGRASS AND COVELL BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PLAT. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MR. MCKINNIS, DO YOU WANT TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF MR. BRYAN? UH, THANK YOU TODD MCKINNIS FOR THE APPLICANT. UH, THE ONE THING I'LL JUST ADD, AND AVERY, CAN YOU BRING UP THE SLIDE I SENT YOU, UH, THE ONE THAT HAS THE, THE MAP, IF YOU DON'T MIND. SO, UH, I HEARD WHAT MR. BRIAN SAID, AND I READ THE MEMO THAT THE ISSUE ON THE SIGNALIZATION HASN'T BEEN OFFERED BY THE APPLICANT AS FAR AS TIMING. AND, UH, SO I WENT THROUGH MY EMAILS OVER THE LAST THREE YEARS AND I HAVE THREE DIFFERENT EMAILS WHERE CLAY, HOLD IRON OR MYSELF HAS COMMUNICATED TO THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THAT WE'RE WILLING TO DO THE SIGNALIZATION. WHEN THE TIA SAYS IT'S WARRANTED, TEC SENT A LETTER TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IN 2024 AND SAID, PHASE ONE DOESN'T WARRANT IT, PHASE TWO DOESN'T WARRANT IT, BUT PHASE THREE WHEN THERE'S RESIDENTIAL DENSITY, IT DOES. AND CONSISTENT WITH THAT, WE OFFERED FOR THE SIGNALIZATION TO BE DONE AT THAT PHASE. UH, HAVE AN EMAIL FROM MR. LAWRENCE THAT SAID, I'M NOT CO CONCERNED RIGHT NOW ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNTS. I'M CONCERNED ABOUT WHEN TIMING IS PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO, OR PHASE THREE. UH, THIS IS A MAP THAT WE HAVE PROVIDED DIFFERENT DERIVATIVES OF TO THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. IT'S IDENTIFIED AS PINK AS PHASE ONE. GREEN IS PHASE TWO, WHICH ALL ACCESSES TO KELLY AND THE LAVENDER OR PURPLE IS PHASE THREE. SO I JUST WANNA SAY ON THE RECORD TONIGHT, UH, THE DEVELOPMENT IS WILLING TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE SIGNALIZATION AT PHASE THREE WHEN THE TEC TRAFFIC, INJURY AND CONSULTANTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAYS IT'S WARRANTED. IT SAYS THAT THIS PHASE ONE DOES NOT CHANGE THE WARRANTS FOR A SHORT GRASS IN COVEL. SO THERE'S NO NEED TO DO A SIGNAL RIGHT NOW, BUT THERE WILL BE, AND WE HAVE SAID IN MULTIPLE EMAILS, AND NOW HERE ON THE RECORD TONIGHT, THAT WE'LL CERTAINLY CONTRIBUTE TO THE SIGNALIZATION WHEN IT'S WARRANTED PER THE EXPERTS, WHICH EVERYBODY AGREES IS PHASE THREE. SO I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT'S CLEAR. UH, IT'S ALWAYS DIFFICULT WHEN THERE'S POOR COMMUNICATION, MAYBE ON MY END, MAYBE ON SOMEBODY ELSE'S. I'M NOT TRYING TO EMBARRASS ANYBODY. I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT THERE HAS BEEN, UH, THAT COMMITMENT ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPMENT FOR THAT SIGNALIZATION. SO THANK YOU, SIR. ANY QUESTIONS OF COMMISSIONERS OF CITY STAFF OR OF THE APPLICANT? YES, I DO HAVE ONE. UM, SO CITY STAFF DOES NOT RECOMMEND, UH, PROVING THIS UNLESS THE TRAFFIC LIGHT GOES IN. IS THERE ANY FLEXIBILITY ON THAT? IT'S GONNA GO IN, WHY NOT DO IT NOW? PROBABLY IF YOU DO IT LATER, COSTS ARE GONNA GO UP ANYWAYS. WELL, I THINK THERE'S TWO REASONS. UH, ONE IS THAT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS SAID MULTIPLE TIMES, WE'RE NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THAT. WE JUST NEED TO KNOW WHEN THAT'S GONNA BE. AND SO THE ISSUE OF EXTRA CONSTRUCTION COSTS ON ONE SMALL PHASE, IT'S ABOUT A $750,000 TICKET TO DO THAT. AND JUST TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE BACKGROUND, UH, AT SECOND, AND KELLY, UH, WHEN KELLY HOLLOW CAME IN ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER BEHIND ALDI, UH, THEY HAD THE EXACT SAME SITUATION WITH A MULTI-FAMILY PRODUCT OR A PHASE PRODUCT. AND THE DEVELOPMENT, UH, PARTNER THERE SAID TO THE CITY, HEY, LISTEN, YOU ALREADY HAVE A PROBLEM AT KELLY AND SECOND STREET, US BEING THE LAST PEOPLE IN, WHY SHOULD WE PAY THE WHOLE $750,000 NUMBER TO FIX A PROBLEM THAT WE DIDN'T CREATE? I MEAN, IF YOU LOOK AT THE WATER JUG IS ALREADY FULL, WE'RE THE LAST DROP IN, AND NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN WE PAY FOR THE WHOLE NEW WATER JUG. IN THAT EXAMPLE, THE DEVELOPER PAID A CONTRIBUTION THAT WAS PROPORTIONATE TO THEIR CONTRIBUTION TO THE PROBLEM. THAT WAS THE DIALOGUE WE WERE HAVING WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS, HEY, WE'RE HAPPY TO CONTRIBUTE, BUT IT'S NOT FAIR FOR THE FIRST PERSON IN OR THE LAST PERSON IN TO PAY THE FULL TILT. AND SO THAT WAS THE EMAIL DIALOGUE THAT RESULTED IN MR. LAWRENCE SAYING, I'M NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT RIGHT NOW. I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A TIMING WHEN IT WILL BE COMMITTED TO. SO WE HEADED DOWN THAT ROUTE. SO, SO MAYBE IT IS CHEAPER NOW THAT IT IS TWO, THREE YEARS FROM NOW. MAYBE IT'S HARDER TO JUSTIFY THE DEVELOPMENT BY TACKING ON $750,000 TODAY. BUT WHAT I'M TRYING TO COMMUNICATE IS I BELIEVE WE'RE IN AGREEMENT THAT WE WANT A DESIRE FOR THE APPLICANT TO COMMIT TO DOING IT. IT'S JUST WIN. AND THE ANSWER IS WE COMMIT TO CONTRIBUTING TO IT, AND IT'S JUST AT PHASE THREE. SO, UH, IT'S REALLY AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM THAT STANDPOINT. IT'S NOT A MATTER OF COMMITTING OR NOT COMMITTING, IT'S NOT A MATTER OF KNOWING WHEN OR NOT KNOWING WHEN. AND IT'S TIED TO A THIRD PARTY, WHICH IS TEC, WHO THEIR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THEY DID IN 2022, AND ANOTHER ONE THEY DID IN FEBRUARY OF 2024, BOTH SAYS THE SAME THING. THAT HASN'T BEEN REJECTED BY ENGINEERING. HEY, THIS IS WHEN IT'S WARRANTED, WHEN YOU HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN PHASE THREE. SO IT WOULD BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE EXPERTS TO DO IT NOW. AND WITH MR. LAWRENCE'S WORDS, IT'S LIKE, WHEN ARE [00:10:01] YOU GONNA COMMIT WHEN IT'S WARRANTED? AND WE'LL DO THAT AND WE'VE GOTTA COME BACK TO YOU GUYS FOR EVERY PLAID ALONG THAT WHOLE PROCESS. SO, SO I'M NOT AN ATTORNEY, BUT DO WE HAVE ANYTHING IN WRITING THAT SAYS YOU WILL, WE YOU WILL PROMISE TO PAY FOR THIS LIGHT? WELL, YOU'VE, YOU'VE GOT MY WORD ON THE RECORD TONIGHT. I CAN MAKE A LETTER COMMIT, I'LL COMMIT TONIGHT TO SEND COMMITMENTS TO THE CITY STAFF OR TO THE CITY BEFORE CITY COUNCIL. I'VE GOT AN EMAIL ON FEBRUARY 11TH, 2024, AN EMAIL ON JULY 8TH, 2025. I'VE GOT AN EMAIL ON JULY 16TH, 2025. I DOES, DOES IS THIS LEGAL STUFF? I DON'T KNOW. WELL, I MEAN, YOU'RE THE ONES THAT HOLD THE CARDS BECAUSE IF I COME BACK IN HERE FOR THE FINAL PLAT TO BE ACCEPTED, THEN YOU'RE GONNA SAY, HEY, DID YOU DO WHAT YOU SAID YOU'RE GONNA DO? AND IF I HAVEN'T DONE IT, YOU DON'T HAVE TO ACCEPT MY PLAT. I MEAN, YOU'VE GOT MORE LEVERAGE THAN ANYBODY. I MEAN, A LETTER FOR ME DOESN'T HAVE NEAR AS MUCH VALUE. THE THREE OUT OF FIVE YOU AGREEING TO LET US MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FINAL PLAT BEING ACCEPTED. I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW HOW ELSE TO DO IT. I CAN HAVE A LETTER. IT'S A UNILATERAL OBLIGATION. THAT'S NO CONSIDERATION. BUT I CAN DO THAT. THAT'S THE COMMITMENT AND IN, IN PAST THE COMMITMENT BY THE APPLICANT IN THE FACE OF FUTURE APPROVALS HAS BEEN GOOD ENOUGH. IT'S JUST, AND I'M, I'M PLAYING A LAWYER UP HERE, BUT I I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE ASKING. SO I GUESS, YEAH, I JUST WOULD FEEL BETTER IF IT WAS IN WRITING SOMEWHERE. COULD I, COULD I ASK, UH, AUSTIN, WHAT, WHAT'S THE, WHAT'S YOUR THOUGHT? YEAH, AFTER HEARING WHAT THE, YOU KNOW, WHAT THE APPLICANTS SAID TONIGHT, I'D LIKE TO HEAR YOUR COMMENTS. YEAH, SO THERE'S UH, ANOTHER COMPONENT TO, UM, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION HERE. UM, THAT'S THE AMOUNT OF CRASHES THAT HAVE HAPPENED AT THIS INTERSECTION OF SHORT GRASS AND COVELL. UM, I BELIEVE WE DID A QUICK SEARCH ON IT BETWEEN THE YEAR, UM, IN THE YEAR OF 2025. THERE WERE SEVEN ACCIDENTS AT THIS INTERSECTION AND WITH FIVE ACCIDENTS THAT WARRANTS, UM, FEDERALLY FOR OUR SENIOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER TO LOOK INTO THE ISSUE AND TRY AND FIGURE OUT A WAY TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY OF THE INTERSECTION. SO THAT'S ANOTHER REASON WHY STAFF IS WANTING TO EXPEDITE THE INTERSECTION. IMPROVEMENTS HERE IS FOR SAFETY, LET ALONE TRAFFIC VOLUME. SO WITH THOSE COMMENTS, HAVE THEY REVIEWED WHAT THE APPLICANT IS SAYING WITH T'S, UM, TRAFFIC SURVEY? IS THAT, IS IS YOUR COMMENTS CONSIDERING WHAT, WHAT MR. MCGINNIS HAS, HAS SAID THAT TEC HAS RECOMMENDED AS WELL? UM, AND I SAY THAT BECAUSE, UM, I MEAN, I HEAR WHAT HE'S SAYING AS WELL, AND IF WE HIRE TEC AND THAT'S WHO'S SUPPOSED TO BE TELLING US WHAT TO DO, I WANNA MAKE SURE THAT, THAT WE ALSO FOLLOW THAT. AND, AND, AND I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE YOU GUYS HAVE CONSIDERED THAT COMPONENT. YOU'VE, YOU'VE READ OR YOU'VE ANALYZED WHAT, WHAT HE SAID THEY PROVIDED AS WELL. FOR SURE. SO IN MY CONVERSATION WITH CORSON SMITH, THE SENIOR TRAFFIC ENGINEER, UM, HE IMPLIED TO ME THAT THE EXISTING TODAY CONDITIONS ARE ALREADY OVER THE, UM, THEY ALREADY WARRANT TRAFFIC, UM, OR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. SO THAT'S INCONSISTENT WITH WHAT TODD SAID, BUT I HAVEN'T REVIEWED IT MYSELF. UM, SO I CAN'T CONFIDENTLY SAY THAT PHASE THREE WARRANTS IT NOT HAVING REVIEWED THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, BUT FROM WHAT I WAS UNDERSTANDING, IT SAID THAT, OR CORSON WAS TELLING ME THAT IT'S WARRANTED DURING PHASE ONE VERSUS PHASE THREE. WELL, I DON'T HAVE IT HERE IN FRONT OF ME, BUT I BELIEVE IT'S SECTION 7.2, WHICH IS A RECOMMENDATION IN THE TIA THAT TEC SAID THAT MENTIONED THE WARRANTS AND WHEN IT WAS JUSTIFIED. NOW WHAT YOU'RE SAYING TONIGHT IS LITERALLY THE FIRST TIME I'VE HEARD THESE SENTENCES UTTERED, AND AGAIN, IT'S NOT YOUR FAULT, AUSTIN, I APPRECIATE IT, BUT ALL WE HAVE TO WORK ON IS THE STAFF COMMENTS THAT WE HAVE IN WRITING AND THE TECI KEEP USING THE SAME LETTER, SORRY, TRAFFIC UNIT CONSULTANTS, THE, THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THAT SAID EXACTLY THAT. AND, AND THAT GOES BACK FOR A LONG TIME BECAUSE THERE WAS AN EMAIL FROM ONE OF YOUR SENIOR STAFF THAT ASKED, IS THERE AN UPDATED TIA AFTER FEBRUARY 15TH, 2024? AND THE ANSWER WAS NO. HERE IT IS. AND THERE'S NEVER BEEN A SINGLE QUESTION AS TO THE RECOMMENDATION REGARDING TIMING FOR SIGNALIZATION. SO ANYWAY, I I, I DON'T KNOW HOW ELSE TO ANSWER IT EXCEPT DEAL WITH THE FACTS IN FRONT OF ME. I'D BE THRILLED FOR YOU TO MAKE A DECISION ON OUR FINAL PLAT AND THEN FOR ME TO MOVE FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL AND KIND OF WORK OUT THE DISCREPANCIES. IN THE MEANTIME, AS YOU'RE RECOMMENDING BODY HAS THE AUTHORITY AND RIGHT TO DO IF WE COULD. SO WE'VE BEEN DOING THIS, AS I SAID, FOR ALMOST TWO AND A HALF YEARS, AND WE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD AND, AND NOT IN COMPROMISE OF WHAT AUSTIN SAID, JUST I'M DEALING WITH THE FACTS WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US. SO A CYNICAL PERSON MIGHT SAY, IF THE CITY HAS A PROBLEM WITH THAT INTERSECTION, WON'T THEY GO FIX, FIX IT, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO DO IT. SO, AND WE HAVEN'T EVEN DONE ANYTHING. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE APPLICANT [00:15:01] OR CITY STAFF? HEARING NONE, UH, MOVING TO PUBLIC COMMENTS, THIS IS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK FOR AGAINST THE PROJECT, BUT I WILL REMIND YOU, PLEASE MAKE ALL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS DIRECTED TO ME AS THE CHAIR. UH, WE'LL GATHER ALL THOSE COMMENTS AND TRY TO GET ANSWERS FOR YOU AT THE CONCLUSION OF EVERYBODY'S COMMENTS. THANK YOU. TAYLOR WILSON, A MEMBER OF THE HOA THAT'S AT COFFEE CREEK RIGHT ACROSS AT SHORT GRASS, AND WE AS A NEIGHBORHOOD JUST WANT TO SUPPORT THE STAFF AND SUPPORT CLARITY OF WHAT IT IS AND CAN FULLY UNDERSTAND THE DEVELOPER WANTING CLARITY ALSO IN THAT PROCESS. SO I WOULD JUST, IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT IT GETS TO THIS STAGE WITHOUT THAT CLARITY BY ALL INVOLVED, UH, ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE'S COMMUNICATION, BUT WITH THE ACCIDENTS AND THE SENIOR FACILITY THAT'S RIGHT THERE AT SHORT GRASS, IT IS A SAFETY CONCERN BOTH FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THOSE ALL INVOLVED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO SPEAK FOR AGAINST THIS, UH, AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. UH, ANY FURTHER COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSIONERS AT THIS TIME? I HAVE ONE. I MEAN, I, I, HERE'S WHAT I WOULD SAY TO THE APPLICANT. I MEAN, HEARING WHAT EVERYBODY'S SAYING, IT SEEMS A LITTLE BIT CONFUSING. I WOULD BE WILLING TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE SUBJECT TO THE RECONCILIATION AND CITY STAFF GETTING ON BOARD WITH THAT, OR YOU CAN CHOOSE TO CONTINUE TO WORK THAT OUT. I, EITHER, EITHER ONE OF THOSE. I'M GOOD WITH MAKING A MOTION FOR, DO YOU, LET'S DO A, I I'M WILLING MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE IT SUBJECT TO CITY STAFF REVIEWING THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, ALL THE STUFF YOU GUYS NEED TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION, UH, IN WORKING OUT THE STOPLIGHT ISSUE. THAT'S MY, THAT WOULD BE MY MOTION AT THE MOMENT. LOOKING FOR A SECOND, IF THERE IS A SECOND, WE HAVE A SECOND BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO THAT WILL BE MOVED, THAT WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF CITY STAFF AND THE APPLICANT WORKING OUT THE TIMING OF THAT STOPLIGHT. UH, AND THAT WILL MOVE ON TO CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 11TH, 2026. THANK YOU. MOVING [D. Case No. SP25-00004; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a Site Plan application for Texas Roadhouse and Shops C and D, located on the north side of Covell Road, west of I-35. (The Seitz Group, Inc.; Ward 2) ] ON TO AGENDA ITEM 3D, CASE NUMBER SP 25 DASH 0 0 0 0 4 PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE TEXAS ROADHOUSE AND SHOPS, D, C, AND D LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF COBELL AND I 35. UH, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? YES, SIR. THANK YOU. MR. BRIAN, PLEASE PRESENT. THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS SITE PLAN IS APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION NORTHEAST OF COVELL AND EXCHANGE. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DETAILS AND INCLUDES THREE BUILDINGS. BUILDING ONE WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 8,000 SQUARE FEET. BUILDING TWO WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 6,700 SQUARE FEET AND BUILDING THREE WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 6,900 SQUARE FEET. ACCESS WILL BE FROM THE INTERNAL STREET AND DRIVE NETWORK BUILDING. ONE WILL BE ACCESSED FROM A PROPOSED PRIVATE ROAD, WHICH WILL EFFECTIVELY BE AN EXTENSION OF EXCHANGE DRIVE TO THE NORTH AND EAST BUILDINGS. TWO AND THREE WILL BE ACCESSED FROM THE EXISTING PORTION OF EXCHANGE DRIVE. THE ELEVATION SHOWED THE BUILDINGS TO BE BETWEEN 28 FEET AND 31 FEET IN HEIGHT. THE FACADES WILL CONSIST OF BRICK, STONE, FIBER, CEMENT BOARD, AND WOOD LOOK PLANKS. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF MR. BRYAN OR LET HIS PRESENTATIONS STAND? YES, SIR. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OF CITY STAFF OR THE APPLICANT FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? I JUST WANNA CONFIRM THAT THE, UH, TEXAS FLAG WILL BE LOWER THAN THE, UH, US FLAG . ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM ITS COMMISSIONERS? MOVING ON TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? PLEASE COME TO THE MIC. SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THIS AGENDA ITEM. I'LL, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION SECOND AND A SECOND BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO THAT IS PASSED AND THAT IS, UH, FINISHED HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO [E. Case No. SP25-00005; Public Hearing and Consideration of approval of a Site Plan application for The Legacy at Covell Common Area A, Lot 10, located on the north side of Covell Road, west of I-35. (The Seitz Group, Inc.; Ward 2) Consideration of Variance to Title 22.6.1(E)(4)(b) which requires 150-foot spacing between points of access. ] AGENDA ITEM THREE E, CASE NUMBER SP TWO FIVE DASH 0 0 0 0 5 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE LEGACY AT COVILLE. COMMON AREA, A LOT 10 LOCATED THE NORTH SIDE OF COVE ROAD IN [00:20:01] WEST OF I 35. MR. BRIAN, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? YES SIR. THANK YOU. AND MR. BRIAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? YES. THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS SITE PLAN IS APPROXIMATELY 3.9 ACRES. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HERITAGE PARK DRIVE AND MARKET STREET. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DETAILS, TWO BUILDINGS APPROXIMATELY 12,000 SQUARE FEET. EACH THREE POINTS OF ACCESS ARE PROVIDED, ONE FROM HERITAGE PARK DRIVE, ONE FROM MARKET STREET, AND ONE FROM THE PRIVATE DRIVE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE ACCESS FROM HERITAGE PARK DRIVE REQUIRES A VARIANCE TO THE 150 FOOT SEPARATION. STANDARD STAFF ANALYSIS OF THIS REQUEST FINDS THE OVERALL ACCESS LAYOUT SUPPORTS SAFE AND EFFICIENT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT. THE ELEVATIONS SHOW THE BUILDING TO BE 30 FEET TALL AT THEIR HIGHEST POINT. THE FACADES WILL CONSIST OF BRICK AND WOOD LOOK PLANKS. TWO MOTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM. FIRST ONE ON THE VARIANCE, AND THEN ON THE SITE PLAN, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE ACCESS SEPARATION VARIANCE. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO MR. BRYAN'S PRESENTATION? OKAY, ANY QUESTIONS OF CITY STAFF OR APPLICANTS OF THE COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NONE. MOVING TO PUBLIC COMMENT, ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENT IS CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE SITE PLAN FIRST? I WILL, I'M SORRY. OH, UH, YES, THE FIRST VOTE OR THE FIRST ITEM TO CONSIDER WILL BE FOR THE VARIANCE. UH, AGENDA ITEM E ONE. THE CONSIDERATION FOR VARIANCE TO TITLE TWO, 2.6 0.1 E FOUR B, WHICH REQUIRES 150 FOOT SPACING BETWEEN POINTS OF ACCESS. LOOKING FOR A MOTION ANY SECOND? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE. WE HAVE A MOTION. I'LL SECOND AND A SECOND BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO. THE VARIANCE IS APPROVED. UH, NOW LOOKING FOR THE ACTUAL SITE PLAN FOR CASE NUMBER SP TWO FIVE DASH 0 0 0 0 5. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE SITE PLAN. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, SORRY, BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO THAT IS APPROVED HERE TONIGHT AND MOVES ON TO CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 11TH, 2026. MOVING ON THE AGENDA, ITEM [F. Case No. SP25-00013; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Site Plan for Integrated Electric, located generally at Kelly Avenue and Hundred Oaks Drive. (Massey; Ward 3)] THREE F, CASE NUMBER SP TWO FIVE DASH 0 0 0 1 3. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR INTEGRATED ELECTRIC LOCATED AT, GENERALLY AT THE AT KELLY AVENUE AND HUNDRED OAKS DRIVE. UH, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. BRIAN. WILL YOU PRESENT? THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS SITE PLAN IS APPROXIMATELY 2.4 ACRES. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION ON THE NORTH SIDE OF A HUNDRED OAKS HALFWAY BETWEEN KELLY AND FRED'S. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DETAILS, TWO BUILDINGS APPROXIMATELY 23,000 SQUARE FEET. EACH ACCESS WILL BE FROM A HUNDRED OAKS DRIVE. THE ELEVATION SHOWED THE BUILDINGS TO BE 20 FEET TALL. THE FACADE WILL FEATURE METAL SIDING, BRICK WAINSCOTING, AND METAL AWNINGS CONSISTENT WITH RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AREA. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF MR. BRYANT? NO. THANK YOU. UH, ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR OF CITY STAFF OF THE COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NONE. MOVING TO PUBLIC COMMENT. DOES ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CASE OUR AGENDA. ITEM THREE F I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. I'LL SECOND AND A SECOND BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO THAT IS APPROVED AND IS DONE HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO AGENDA [G. Case No. SP25-00029; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a Site Plan for Hawaiian Bros restaurant in Kickingbird Plaza, located at 1701 E 2nd Street. (Zt Org Edmond LLC; Ward 2)] ITEM, UH, 3G. CASE NUMBER SP TWO FIVE DASH 0 2 9 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR HAWAIIAN BROTHERS RESTAURANT IN KICKING BIRD PLAZA LOCATED AT 1701 EAST SECOND STREET. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? YES SIR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. UH, MR. BRIAN, PLEASE PRESENT. THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS SITE PLAN IS APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SECOND STREET, SEVERAL HUNDRED FEET EAST OF BRYANT. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DETAILS, ONE BUILDING APPROXIMATELY 2,500 SQUARE FEET. ACCESS WILL BE FROM THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ON SECOND STREET. THE ELEVATION SHOWS THE BUILDING TO BE APPROXIMATELY 17 FEET TALL. FACADE MATERIALS AND APPEARANCE ARE COMPLIANT AND CONSISTENT WITH THE AREA. [00:25:01] STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF MR. BRYANT? NO. THANK YOU. LOOKING FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OF CITY STAFF OR THE APPLICANT? SEEING NONE. MOVING TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. DOES ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? UH, PLEASE COME UP, SAY YOUR NAME AND JUST AS A REMINDER, PLEASE ADDRESS ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS TO ME, THE CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE, AND I'LL DO MY BEST TO GET ANSWERS FOR YOU AFTER EVERYBODY'S SPOKEN. OKAY. MY NAME IS TOM SHADING. I OWN, UH, A, A SMALL OFFICE BUILDING JUST TO THE WEST OF THIS LOCATION. UH, WHEN THE CITY IMPROVED SECOND STREET AND BRYANT INTERSECTION, IT CREATED LEFT TURN, RIGHT TURN LANES, ET CETERA. UH, PRESENTLY WHERE THIS, IF, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU PUT THAT BACK UP ON THE MAP UP THERE, BUT WHERE IT SHOWS IT'S ON ON SECOND STREET. OKAY. THERE IS A, THERE'S A, A CENTER TURN LANE THAT FOR LEFT TURNS COMING FROM THE WEST AND LEFT TURNS COMING FROM THE EAST. UH, THE PROBLEM I SEE IS THE WAY THE CITY HAS HAS STRUCTURED THAT PARTICULAR LEFT LANE FROM THE LEFT SIDE, AS YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S A, THERE'S A BOUNDARY DI DIVIDING THE ROADS, MAKING IT FOUR LANE WITH ITS CENTER TURN LANE. THE PROBLEM IS THERE IS A LEFT TURN OPTION FROM THE WEST END ON SECOND STREET INTO THAT PROPERTY. UH, RIGHT TO THE WEST OF THERE IS A KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN. MY OFFICE BUILDING IS DIRECTLY BEHIND IT. UH, THE PROBLEM IS THAT THEY PUT UP THESE YELLOW POLES AND THERE ISN'T EVEN ROOM FOR ONE CAR COMING FROM THE WEST TO MAKE A LEFT TURN AT THAT LOCATION. UH, ALL MY CLIENTS COMPLAIN ADAMANTLY ABOUT THAT BECAUSE THEY CAN'T MAKE A LEFT TURN COMING FROM THE WEST. AND IT'S ALSO IN BASICALLY INTERFERENCE WITH THE LEFT TURN COMING FROM THE EAST THAT'S GOING INTO BRYANT SQUARE. THE, YOU KNOW, THE, UH, SHOPPING CENTER. I JUST SEE IT, THIS THIS AREA RIGHT HERE. I I'VE BEEN IN THAT BUILDING FOR A LONG TIME, PROBABLY 20 YEARS NOW. AND IT HAS BEEN A, A HORRENDOUS LOCATION BEFORE. THEY IMPROVED IT AS THEY DID WITH ACCIDENTS. PEOPLE WANTING TO COME OUT OF THAT LOCATION INTO THAT LOCATION AND SECOND STREET WAS CONSTANTLY HAVING ACCIDENTS. NOW IT, IT IMPROVED IT BY PUTTING THAT TURN LEFT TURN LANE IN THERE. AND THE PROBLEM IS THEY PUT THE YELLOW POLES SO FAR AWAY ALONG THAT LOCATION THAT THERE IS HARDLY ROOM FOR ONE CAR TO MAKE A LEFT TURN FROM THE WEST ON SECOND STREET. UH, PRESENTLY I DON'T GO THERE. I GO BEHIND ALL THE OTHER BUILDINGS ON, UH, I, I MAKE A U-TURN AT BRYANT AND GO IN THAT WAY BECAUSE I HAVE ALMOST BEEN REAR-ENDED BY CARS COMING ON SECOND STREET BECAUSE THERE'S NOWHERE FOR CARS TO GET OUT OF THE MAIN TRAFFIC LANE UNLESS THEY REMOVE SOME OF THOSE YELLOW POLES. UH, I DON'T SEE THE REASON WHY THEY PUT SO MANY ON THERE. IT JUST CUTS OFF THAT TURN LANE AND THERE IS NOWHERE FOR ANYBODY TO REALLY MAKE A LEFT TURN LANE, ESPECIALLY IF SOMEBODY'S COMING FROM THE EAST AND WANTS TO GO INTO BRYANT, BRYANT SQUARE. IT, IT'S CREATING, I BELIEVE BY, UH, I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO THE RESTAURANT TO BE PUT IN THERE 'CAUSE I'M SURE I'LL USE IT. I LIVE, YOU KNOW, MY OFFICE RIGHT NEXT TO IT, BUT I, THE, THE TRAFFIC'S GONNA, THE TRAFFIC PROBLEM RIGHT THERE I THINK IS GONNA BE HORRENDOUS. AND I KNOW THAT KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN IS DEALING WITH THE SAME PROBLEM. UH, THEY HAVEN'T, I, I WOULD'VE EXPECTED THEY WOULD'VE COME HERE TODAY TO COMPLAIN ABOUT ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC OF THAT NATURE OF THE SIGNIFICANCE IT'S GONNA CAUSE. SECOND STREET IS ALREADY A, A SIGNIFICANT PROBLEM, UH, TRAFFIC WISE AS YOU'RE ALL AWARE. AND BY HAVING CARS BACK UP FROM THE WEST, UH, IT, IT IS GONNA BACK UP INTO THAT BRYANT INTERSECTION OFF TO THE LEFT THERE. UH, WHICH IT DOES ALREADY IF ONE CAR WANTS TO MAKE THAT LEFT TURN. SO I ALL, I ALL, I GUESS ALL I'M ASKING IS I'M, I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT AREA RIGHT NOW, WHICH IS NOTHING BUT A, A, A PILE OF MUD, UH, DIRT AND UH, LOOKING FORWARD TO A RESTAURANT TO BE COME IN THERE, BUT THE CITY OR SOMEBODY ENGINEER, SOMEBODY'S GOTTA COME IN AND REMOVE SOME OF THOSE YELLOW POLES TO ALLOW CARS TO MAKE THAT LEFT TURN THERE. AND THAT'S, ANYWAY, I HOPE YOU APPRECIATE THAT. I HOPE SAID HE CAN, CAN DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO SPEAK FOR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? SEEING NONE PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. UM, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? CAN, CAN WE ASK CITY STAFF? ABSOLUTELY. [00:30:02] I'D LOVE TO HAVE SOME COMMENTS IF YOU DON'T MIND. THAT'D BE GREAT. THANK YOU FOR SURE. AUSTIN SMITH, DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER. UM, SO THE CITY HAS, UM, WHEN THIS APPLICATION CAME IN, WE REVIEWED THEIR EXISTING USE OF THAT DRIVEWAY. AND UM, PART OF MY CONVERSATION WITH THE SENIOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER IS THAT THERE ARE PLANS FOR PROTECTED LEFT TURNS IN THE FUTURE AT THIS, UM, INTERSECTION. UM, THE TIMING OF THAT IS A LITTLE IFFY, BUT UM, WE WERE COMFORTABLE ENOUGH WITH ALLOWING THEM TO UTILIZE THE EXISTING DRIVE WITHOUT MODIFICATIONS BECAUSE WE PLAN ON, UM, IMPROVING THIS. AND THERE'S ALSO A, UH, SECOND STREET STUDY THAT'S GOING ON WITHIN THE CITY WHERE WE'RE ANALYZING THAT WHOLE CORRIDOR BETWEEN I 35 AND BROADWAY. UM, I BELIEVE THERE'S PROBABLY SOME IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDED IN THIS AREA, UM, IN THAT STUDY WHICH CITY STAFF WILL, UM, REVIEW AND POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENT AS WELL. SO IT IS BEING CONSIDERED, UM, AND HOPEFULLY SOME PROGRESS WILL BE MADE IN THE FUTURE. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM CITY STAFF OR, I'M SORRY, NOT CITY STAFF, BUT FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? HEARING NONE LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND I'LL MAKE A MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION. I WILL SECOND AND A SECOND BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO THAT IS APPROVED AND IS DONE HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. UH, ITEM NUMBER FOUR, DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION ITEMS LISTED BELOW OR DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION ARE USUALLY DISCUSSED AND CONSIDERED INDIVIDUALLY BY MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. SO [A. Nomination and Election of Planning Commission Chair] FOUR A IS A NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF A PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR. I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE BRIAN BLUNDELL TO CONTINUE HIS ROLE AS CHAIRMAN IF HE SO ACCEPTS IT. I WOULD THANK YOU. I WILL SECOND THAT. CAN WE VOTE ON IT? YOU HAVE TO VOTE ON IT BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO. UH, I'VE BEEN RENOMINATED APPARENTLY. THANK YOU. UH, AGENDA [B. Nomination and Election of Planning Commission Vice-Chair] ITEM FOUR B NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF A PLANNING COMMISSION VICE CHAIR. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO NOMINATE CHIP WINTER TO REMAIN THE VICE CHAIR. I WILL SECOND THAT BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO. UH, CHIP WINTER HAS BEEN ELECTED AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION VICE CHAIR. MOVING ON THE AGENDA, UH, AGENDA. UH, ITEM NUMBER FIVE, CITIZEN COMMENTS. THIS IS OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZEN TO COMMENT ON ANYTHING PLANNING COMMISSION RELATED THAT WAS NOT ON THE AGENDA. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC CITIZEN COMMENTS AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE, CITIZEN COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. COMMISSIONERS, ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME ON PLAINTIFF COMMISSION TOPICS? NOT ON THE AGENDA. SEEING NONE. LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO ADJOURN? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND, WE HAVE A SECOND LIVE LAB PHOTO TO THREE TO ZERO. WE ARE ADJOURNED. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.