* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:01] EVENING, WE'RE GONNA GO AHEAD AND CALL TO ORDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 20TH, 2026. [2. General Consent Items: Items listed under General Consent are usually approved as a group with the proper motion from a member of the Planning Commission. Members of the Planning Commission may pull any item under General Consent for separate discussion and/or action.] MOVING DOWN THE AGENDA, WE HAVE OUR, UH, CONSENT AGENDA. THE ITEMS LISTED UNDER THE CON - UNDER THE GENERAL CONSENT ARE USUALLY APPROVED AS A GROUP WITH THE PROPER MOTION FROM A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY PULL ANY ITEM UNDER GENERAL CONSENT FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION. DO ANY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION WISH TO HAVE AN ITEM HEARD SEPARATELY? SEEING NONE, THE... LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT ITEM. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. BY VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED. MOVING ON TO, AND THAT, UH, CASE NUMBER 2B IS DONE HERE TONIGHT. MOVING TO, DOWN THE ITEMS TO THE [A. Case No. U26-00023; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a Specific Use Permit for a massage therapy business located at 1151 West 15th Street. (Willis; Ward 3)] PUBLIC HEARING. WE HAVE CASE NUMBER 4A. MR. BRYAN, WILL YOU GO AHEAD AND PRESENT? THIS IS CASE NUMBER U26-00023, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS LOCATED AT 1151 WEST 15TH STREET. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. UH, MR. BRYAN. YES, THANK YOU. THERE'S AN EXISTING BUSINESS AT THIS LOCATION WORKING TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH OUR RECENTLY APPROVED SUPPLEMENTAL USE STANDARDS. THESE STANDARDS REQUIRE THAT THERAPIST LICENSE BE POSTED ON SITE AND PROHIBIT OPAQUE TINT ON WINDOWS AND DOORS FACING THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. BASED ON THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED, THIS LOCATION HAS DEMONSTRATED SUCH COMPLIANCE. THIS BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A SHOPPING CENTER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 15TH WEST OF KELLY. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MR. BRYAN. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE CITY STAFF'S PRESENTATION? OKAY. IF NOT, ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR OF, OF THE CITY STAFF OF THE COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NONE, WE HAVE PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS AGENDA ITEM IN THE PUBLIC? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON AGENDA ITEM 4A. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. BY A VOTE OF TWO TO ONE, THAT IS NOT APPROVED HERE TONIGHT. HOWEVER, IT DOES STILL MOVE ON TO CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. THANK YOU. MOVING ON [B. Case No. PR25-00011; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Preliminary Plat for Sierra Brook, located on the west side of Midwest Boulevard, south of Coffee Creek Road. (Farzaneh Development, LLLP; Ward 2)   The applicant has requested that this item be continued to the Planning Commission meeting scheduled November 03, 2026. ] TO CASE NUMBER 4B. THIS IS CASE NUMBER PR25-00011. THIS IS THE, UM, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SIERRA BROOK. THIS, AT THIS TIME, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED FOR THIS TO BE CONTINUED TO THE NOVEMBER 3RD OF 2026 MEETING. LOOKING FOR A, A MOTION AND A SECOND FROM THE COMMISSIONERS. MOTION. SO MOVED. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND WILL BE HEARD ON THE NOVEMBER 3RD, 2026 MEETING. MOVING ON DOWN TO 4C, [C. Case No. PR26-00015; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Preliminary Plat for Honeyfield Phase II, located south and east of Covell and Kelly. (Broadway Development Group; Ward 1)] CASE NUMBER PR26-00015, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT AT HONEYFIELD PHASE TWO, LOCATED SOUTH AND EAST OF COVELL AND KELLY. UM, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. UH, MR. BRYAN. MARTHA GRAFTON, OUR, UH, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEER IS GONNA PRESENT THIS ONE. OKAY. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HONEYFIELD PHASE TWO, LOCATED SOUTH AND EAST OF COVELL AND KELLY WITHIN THE KELLY CORNER HONEYFIELD DEVELOPMENT. THE PLAT INCLUDES PARCELS AREAS SEVEN AND EIGHT AS SPECIFIED IN PUDZ2200035 KELLY CORNER AMENDED. ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE FROM A NEWLY CONSTRUCTED PUBLIC ROAD WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE COMMISSIONERS, OR I'M SORRY, OF THE STA... I'M SORRY. THE APPLICANT, DO YOU WISH TO ADD ANYTHING TO THE CITY STAFF'S PRESENTATION? NO, SIR. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CITY STAFF OR THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME? NO. SEEING NONE, MOVING TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST AGENDA ITEM 4C? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND IS DONE HERE TONIGHT. MOVING ON TO, UH, [D. Case No. PR26-00018; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Preliminary Plat for Lincoln Development, located on the north side of 33rd, between Technology and Teakwood. (Nafa Engineering; Ward 3)] CASE NUMBER OR AGENDA ITEM 4D, [00:05:01] CASE NUMBER PR26-00018, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LINCOLN DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 33RD BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY AND TEAKWOOD. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. UH, MR. BRYAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? MARTHA GRAFTON WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IS GONNA PRESENT THIS ONE. THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LINCOLN DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 33RD STREET BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY DRIVE AND TEAKWOOD. THIS PLAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE APPROVED SITE PLAN SP2500018 INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, WHICH INCLUDES TWO FLEX WAREHOUSE OFFICE BUILDINGS ON THE SITE AND WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 8TH, 2026. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CITY STAFF OR OF THE, UH, APPLICANT... OR I'M SORRY. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE CITY STAFF'S PRESENTATION? NO. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE CITY STAFF OR OF THE APPLICANT FROM THE COMMISSIONERS AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE, LOOKING, OR, UH, WE HAVE PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND IS FINISHED HERE TONIGHT. MOVING ON TO [E. Case No. PR26-00026; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Preliminary Plat for Delaware Creek, located on the northwest side of Coffee Creek and Sooner and on the southwest side of Coffee Creek and Sooner. (LTS Engineering Services, LLC; Ward 2)] AGENDA ITEM 4E, CASE NUMBER PR26-00026, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DELAWARE CREEK LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF COFFEE CREEK AND SOONER AND ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF COFFEE CREEK AND SOONER. UH, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. UM, MS. GRAFTON, WILL YOU GO AHEAD AND PRESENT THIS ONE? THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DELAWARE CREEK LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF COFFEE CREEK AND SOONER ROAD AND ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF COFFEE CREEK AND SOONER ROAD. THIS PLAT ENCOMPASSES TRACKS THREE AND FOUR OF THE LIBERTY PARK EAST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Z2300015. THE OVERALL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPEARS TO COMPLY WITH THE MIXED USE NATURE OF THE PUD. HOWEVER, THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT ONLY INCLUDES THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITE. THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED AN OVERALL MASTER PLAN TO SHOW THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT AS COMPLETED, WHICH HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT ATTACHMENTS. THE PUD WAS RECENTLY ADMINISTRATIVELY AMENDED BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR AS PER TITLE 22.3. 5F, MINOR MODIFICATION, TO REMOVE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF LO- LOTS ALLOWED WITHIN THESE TWO TRACKS. THE PUD PREVIOUSLY, PREVIOUSLY ALLOWED A MAXIMUM TOTAL OF 478 RESIDENTIAL LOTS WHILE THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSES 599 RESIDENTIAL LOTS. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. THANK YOU. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO CITY STAFF'S PRESENTATION? OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT OF THE, OR THE CITY STAFF OF THE COMMISSIONERS AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT HERE IN THE PUBLIC TODAY? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. UM, ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR A MOTION TO SECOND FROM THE COMMISSIONERS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR? MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND. AND WE HAVE A SECOND. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND IS FINISHED HERE TONIGHT. MOVING ON TO AGENDA [F. Case No. VA26-00012; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a request for a ground sign to be located in an easement, on the property located on the east side of Sooner Road, on the north side of Conference Drive. (Legacy at Covell Shops, LLC; Ward 2)] ITEM 4F, CASE NUMBER VA26-00012, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR A GROUND SIGN TO BE LOCATED IN AN EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOONER ROAD AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CONFERENCE DRIVE. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. UM, THIS WILL BE MR. BRIAN. GO AHEAD AND PRESENT FOR US. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AS YOU INDICATED, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO THE SIGN CODE TO ALLOW A GROUND SIGN PLACED IN A PUBLIC EASEMENT. THE SPECIFIC LOCATION IS SHOWN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOONER AND CONFERENCE DRIVE. STAFF DID NOT IDENTIFY CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED PLACEMENT AND FURTHER NOTED THAT SHOULD THE SIGN BE DAMAGED OR NEED TO BE REMOVED AS A RESULT OF MAINTENANCE OR OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EASEMENT, NO COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE SIGN OWNER. THE SIGN ITSELF IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MASTER SIGN PLAN AND THE APPROVED PUD. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF CITY STAFF? [00:10:01] THANK YOU. UH, GOOD EVENING, TODD MCKINNIS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. JUST MENTION, UH, AFFIRMATION OF WHAT MR. BRYAN SAID. WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ROLE OF THE DEVELOPER IN THE EVENT THE SIGN HAS TO BE MOVED BECAUSE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. THIS WAS THE ONLY PLACE THAT IT WOULD GO BASED ON SOME INSTRUMENT WHERE THIS DEVELOPER GAVE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CITY OF EDMOND OUTSIDE OF THE PLATTING REQUIREMENT. SO THIS IS WHERE IT IS. YOU MAY REMEMBER WE MODIFIED THE PUD NOT LONG AGO TO REMOVE TWO SIGNS ONTO SOON AND ONLY ALLOW ONE. THEY COULD BE AS TALL AS 60 FEET TALL. THIS IS A 40-FOOT SIGN. KIP RYAN IS HERE ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPER AS WELL AS THE SIGN, UH, VENDOR IS HERE AS WELL. IF I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF CITY STAFF OR OF THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME? I THINK MY ONLY QUESTION WAS, WOULD IT BE IN THERE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THAT ENTRANCE? IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE IT WOULDN'T INTERFERE WITH ANY SORT OF SIDE PATH BECAUSE YOU'RE GONNA BE TURNING RIGHT OUT OF THERE. TURNING LEFT IS ONLY FROM A SIGNAL, SO I CAN'T IMAGINE IT HAS ANY - YEAH, THE DEVELOPER WORKED WITH THE CITY STAFF TO IDENTIFY THIS AS, I WOULDN'T SAY THE ONLY LOCATION, BUT VIRTUALLY THE ONLY LOCATION THAT THIS WOULD WORK. YEAH. AND IT IS, UH, CLEAR OF ANY CONFLICTS. YEP. OKAY. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FROM, UH, COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NONE, LOOKING FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO, IN THE PUBLIC, WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THIS AGENDA ITEM. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND WE HAVE A SECOND. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND MOVES ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. THANK YOU. [G. Case No. VA26-00013; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a request for a ground sign to be located in the right-of-way, on the property located at 2725 Market Street. (Legacy at Covell Shops, LLC; Ward 2)] AGENDA ITEM 4G, CASE NUMBER VA26-00013, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR A... OH, SORRY. THAT'S THE... OH, SORRY. IS THIS STILL THE SAME ONE? THE GROUND SIGN TO BE LOCATED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PROPERTY AT 2725 MARKET STREET. AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE. GOTCHA. MR. BRIAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? CERTAINLY. THANK YOU. UM, AS YOU INDICATED, THE APPLICANT'S REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW GROUND SIGN TO BE PLACED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. THE SPECIFIC LOCATION IS SHOWN ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COVELL AND MARKET. STAFF DID NOT IDENTIFY CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED PLACEMENT AND FURTHER NOTED THAT THE, SHOULD THE SIGN BE DAMAGED OR NEED TO BE REMOVED AS A RESULT OF MAINTENANCE OR OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT OF WAY, NO COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE SIGN OWNER. THE SIGN ITSELF IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MASTER SIGN PLAN AND THE APPROVED PUD. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ANY QUE - OR ANYTHING THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD WISH TO ADD TO THAT? OKAY. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE APPLICANT OR OF THE CITY STAFF? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. THANK YOU. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO Z - THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND MOVES ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. THANK YOU. [H. Case No. SP26-00008; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Site Plan for 7 Brew Covell Crossing, located at 4016 East Covell Road. (Triangle Engineering, LLC; Ward 2)] MOVING DOWN THE AGENDA TO 4H, CASE NUMBER SP26-00008, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR SEVEN BREW COVELL CROSSING LOCATED AT 4016 EAST COVELLE ROAD. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. UM, MR. BRYANT, WILL YOU PRESENT? YES, THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS CASE IS APPROXIMATELY 27,000 SQUARE FEET. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COVELL, WEST OF SOONER IN THE COVELL CROSSING DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DETAILS. ONE BUILDING, APPROXIMATELY 510 SQUARE FEET. ACCESS WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE EXISTING DRIVES. THE PROJECT WILL CONNECT TO EDMOND UTILITIES. NO VARIANCE TO SITE DESIGN STANDARDS ARE REQUESTED. I WOULD ASK IF, UH, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HAS ANYTHING TO ADD, AND IF NOT, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO US? I DO NOT. PERFECT. AND THIS IS IN COMPLIANCE? I KNOW THIS HAS BEEN A CONVERSATION PIECE IN THIS AREA FOR A LONG TIME, BUT THIS IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUD AND EVERYTHING THAT'S ALREADY BEEN FILED, UM, CORRECT? YES. YES, OF COURSE. PERFECT. UH, THE APPLICANT, DO YOU WISH TO ADD ANYTHING TO MR. BRYANT'S PRESENTATION? THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS TO CITY STAFF OR TO THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE, ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? [00:15:01] SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND IS DONE HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. MOVING ON [I. Case No. SP26-00009; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Site Plan for Faith Bible Church expansion, located at 600 North Coltrane Road. (Faith Bible Church; Ward 2) Said Consideration to Include Consideration of Approval of an Exception to Title 22.6.1.E(6) which requires sidewalks along public rights-of-way.  ] TO AGENDA ITEM 4I, CASE NUMBER SP26-0009, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN FOR FAITH BIBLE CHURCH EXPANSION LOCATED AT 600 NORTH COLTRANE ROAD. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. UM, MR. BRYAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? YES, THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS CASE IS APPROXIMATELY 15 ACRES. THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLTRANE, APPROXIMATELY HALFWAY BETWEEN 2ND AND DANFORTH. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DETAILS, EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING PARKING LOT AND IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. THE PROJECT IS CONNECTED TO EDMOND UTILITIES. ACCESS WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN EXCEPTION TO THE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENT. TITLE 22 REQUIRES SIDEWALKS ALONG ALL PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY, WHILE ALSO PROVIDING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY GRANT AN EXCEPTION WHERE QUOTE, "EXTRAORDINARY TOPOGRAPHICAL OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS WOULD RESULT IN EXCEPTIONAL PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES OR UNDUE HARDSHIPS UPON THE OWNER." ALL OTHER SITE PLAN PROVISIONS HAVE BEEN MET. THIS APPLICATION REQUIRES TWO MOTIONS, ONE FOR THE EXCEPTION AND ONE FOR THE SITE PLAN ITSELF. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE EXCEPTION. THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO PROVIDE A DETAILED JUSTIFICATION FOR THEIR REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION. THANK YOU, MR. BRYAN. WILL THE APPLICANT COME FORWARD AND KIND OF, UH, PRESENT FOR US? GO AHEAD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR US. I'M DAN ANDREWANIS WITH SMITH ROBERTS BALDERSCHWEILER, AND WE ARE THE, UH, CIVIL SITE ENGINEERS FOR THIS PROJECT. AND THE REASON WE'VE, UH, REQUESTED THE EXCEPTION IS BECAUSE OF THE TOPOGRAPHY, UH, ADJOINING, UH, THE, THE ROAD THERE. IT'S, IT'S VERY STEEP. IT'S EXCEEDS THREE TO ONE IN SOME PLACES. SO TO PUT A SIDEWALK IN, WE'D HAVE TO PUT A SIDEWALK AND A RETAINING WALL TO KEEP THE, THE WALK ALONG, UH, ALONG, UH, COLTRANE THERE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADA GUIDELINES. AND WE'VE DONE PROJECTS OVER THE YEARS A- AND, AND, AND I TH - WE THOUGHT THAT BACK IN THE DAY WHEN, WHEN THERE WAS A FEE IN LIEU OF, THAT WE HAD ACQUIRED THAT, BUT COULDN'T FIND RECORD OF THAT, SO MAYBE, UH, THAT WAS JUST A DISCUSSION, BUT WE HADN'T BEEN REQUIRED IN THE PAST TO PUT THE SIDEWALK IN BECAUSE OF THOSE RESTRICTIONS OF THE TOPOGRAPHY THERE. SO, UM, LIKE I SAID, THE S - THE S - THE, THE SLOPES APPROACHING COLTRANE ARE, ARE THREE TO ONE OR EVEN STEEPER IN SOME PLACES, SO WE'D HAVE TO PUT THE SIDEWALK IN AND PROBABLY BUILD A RETAINING WALL OUT THERE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY TO GET THE SIDEWALK IN. SO THAT'S, THAT'S THE REASON FOR OUR REQUEST HERE. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR OF CITY STAFF OF THE, UM, OF THE COMMISSIONERS? DOES THE PROPERTY THAT ADJOINS THESE ON BOTH SIDES HAVE A SIDEWALK? NOT SURE. GOSH. I WOULD THINK TO THE NORTH IT DOES AT BLAKE'S BLUFF AND THEN IT'S CONTINUE ON TO A, A RETAIL PUD. DO YOU... MR. BRYAN OR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA ON THAT? I MEAN, I GUESS THE QUESTION REALLY IS, IS, IS THIS GONNA BE THE ONLY PARCEL THAT DOESN'T HAVE A SIDEWALK? RIGHT. AND, UH, THAT'S MY CONCERN, A LITTLE BIT OF THE CONNECTIVITY IN THIS AREA - SURE. BECAUSE THIS WILL BE DEVELOPED AT SOME POINT WITH THAT NEW UNCOMMON GROUND OVER THERE. UM, IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT DOES, BUT... I DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S SIDEWALKS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE ROAD ANYMORE. I, I DON'T BELIEVE THERE IS. OKAY. AND OVER THE YEARS WE HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE WIDENING OF COLTRANE. SURE. THEY HAVE TAKEN CARE OF THAT. YEP. IS THERE ANY CONNECT - WELL, MR. BRIAN'S LOOKING THAT UP. YEAH, GO FOR IT. IS THERE ANY CONNECTIVITY PLAN THAT WE KNOW OF THAT THERE'S... I MEAN, THE FUTURE TO HAVE SIDEWALKS THERE AND THAT WAS SPURRED BY THE UNCOMMON GROUNDS? IS THAT IN PLANS OR DO WE KNOW? I THINK MR. BRYAN'S, YEAH, KEN WAS LOOKING. SO IT DOESN'T APPEAR AS IF THERE'S SIDEWALKS TO THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH OF THIS PROPERTY. UM, JUST KIND OF LOOKING AT THE, MAKING SURE I WAS LOOKING AT THE MOST RECENT AERIAL, UM, OR ACROSS THE STREET. I KNOW THERE ARE PLANS TO MAKE SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO COLTRANE, UH, [00:20:01] TOWARDS 2ND STREET ASSOCIATED WITH UNCOMMON GROUND. UM, I THINK IT'S PROBABLY WORTH NOTING ON THIS PROPERTY, UH, THEY HAVE A, A, A PLAT PENDING, AND AS A PART OF THAT PLATTING PROCESS, THEY'LL DEDICATE RIGHT OF WAY TO ALLOW FOR FUTURE EXPANSION AND UTILITIES, UH, OF THE, OF THE ARTERIAL ROAD. YEAH. UH, THE, THE FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE 70 FEET TOTAL, UH, FROM THE CENTER LINE. OKAY. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE APPLICANT OR CITY STAFF? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST? TAYLOR WILSON. UM, I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR MORE DISCUSSIONS THAT ARE VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU WERE GOING DOWN THE PATH, JUST BECAUSE THERE'S NOT ANY SIDEWALKS NOW. WITH UNCOMMON GROUND, YOU'RE GONNA WANT PEOPLE TO WALK THERE, SO EITHER A COMMITMENT TO PUT IT IN WHENEVER, BECAUSE ALL I HEARD IS THE JUSTIFICATION WAS A MATH EQUATION THAT SAYS IT'S GONNA BE EXPENSIVE. AND SO I THINK THERE'S A RULE THAT WE HAVE THOSE RULES IN THERE FOR A REASON, AND I'M SURE THE CHURCH WANTS TO COMPLY TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO USE SIDEWALKS AND CARE ABOUT THE COMMUNITY. THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? SEEING NONE, UH, WILL YOU KINDA KINDA COME BACK UP FOR ME REAL QUICK? GO AHEAD AND SPEAK A LITTLE BIT TO THAT POINT BECAUSE THEN THAT'S WHERE I' STRUGGLING A LITTLE BIT, IS THE CONNECTIVITY IN THIS AREA, UM, BECAUSE EITHER THE TAXPAYERS ARE GONNA HAVE TO PAY FOR IT OR WE'RE GO - OR AT SOME POINT THIS WILL BE EXPANDED. SO HELP ME UNDERSTAND A LITTLE BIT MORE. KIND OF ELABORATE A LITTLE BIT AND I DON'T... I WANNA MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND, UM - OKAY. OTHER THAN JUST THE MATH. I MEAN, TAYLOR'S RIGHT. IT APPEARS TO BE A MATH EQUATION, BUT I WANNA MAKE SURE THAT... TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT WHY WE DON'T DO THAT. WELL, IT'S, IT, IT, IT'S MORE THAN JUST THE, THE EXPENSE. IT'S THE LOGISTICS OF PUTTING IT IN THERE WITH A RETAINING WALL OUT IN THE RI- RIGHT OF WAY TO RETAIN THE, THE SLOPE FROM, FROM THE, THE PROPERTY LINE DOWN TO THE, DOWN TO THE ROAD THERE. AND THEN, BUT IF IT... IN THE FUTURE, IF, IF THE CITY WANTS TO DO UTILITIES OR ANYTHING WITH THAT ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY THE CHURCH IS GRANTING THAT, THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THAT AS WELL. UM, AND - THE SIDEWALK WOULD PRE - WOULD PRESENT, WOULD PREVENT THAT? WELL, THE RETAINING WALL WOULD BE, WOULD, WOULD BE DIFFICULT. I ASSUME IF YOU'RE GRANTING AN EASEMENT THOUGH, YOU PROBABLY WOULD BUILD THAT ON THE, ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE EASEMENT, YOUR SIDEWALK. I'M SORRY. IF YOU'RE GRANTING THE 70-FOOT EASEMENT, I ASSUME YOUR SIDEWALK WILL BE OUTSIDE OF THAT EASEMENT. WELL, THE SIDEWALK WOULD BE JUST OFFSET FROM THE BACK OF CURB IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY STANDARDS TO BE OUT IN THE RIGHT OF WAY NEAR THE, NEAR THE ROAD. AND, AND, AND, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE... I, I MEAN, JUST LOGISTICALLY, IT'S TOUGH AND I, I... AND, AND, AND, AND THE GRADES ARE, ARE, ARE, ARE DIFFICULT TO GET IT IN THERE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADA COMPLIANT, UH, GUIDELINES FOR THE SIDEWALK. AND WE'D HAVE A RETAINING WALL OUT IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. AND SO - OKAY. FOR THOSE REASONS, WE - GOTCHA. WE REQUESTED THE VARIANCE. GOTCHA. AND I, AND I'VE BEEN A BIG FAN OF SIDEWALKS SINCE I'VE BEEN ON THIS COMMISSION. I THINK I HAVEN'T VOTED... I THINK I VOTED EVERY TIME FOR SIDEWALKS, SO THAT'S WHERE I STRUGGLE A LITTLE BIT. I ALSO AM A BIG FAN OF THIS PROJECT HAPPENING, AND SO JUST IN GENERAL, IT'S - NO, I UNDERSTAND. THE SIDEWALK, I THINK, IS, IS A KEY TO, TO AN EXTENT. UM, BUT I'LL BE QUIET AND HAVE ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY COMMENTS THEY'D LIKE TO SHARE OR NOT. I- IS THIS IN ANY PLANS TO WIDEN COLTRANE RIGHT THERE IN THE FUTURE? WELL, HE'S... THEY SAID THEY'RE GONNA DONATE A 70 FOOT EASEMENT. WE'RE DO - WE'RE DONATING THE RIGHT OF WAY AND WE HAVE WIDE, UH, THE COLT TRAIN, UH, ADDED AN ADDITIONAL LANE ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLT TRAIN, UH, THE TIRE LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY, UH, IN, IN PAST PROJECTS THAT THE CHURCH HAS DONE. SO IF WE WERE TO REQUIRE A SIDEWALK, WOULD THAT SIDEWALK GET BUILT IN THAT EASEMENT TO WHERE IT WOULD BE REMOVED LATER ON, AND THEN, UH, WHOSE EXPENSE WOULD IT BE TO PUT IT BACK IF THE WI - THE ROAD WERE WIDENED? I SAID I WAS ADDING MR. BRIAN OR THE ENGINEERING HELP WITH THAT. THE LAST THING I WANNA SAY, "HEY, YOU NEED TO PUT A SIDEWALK IN AND THREE YEARS LATER, WE'RE GONNA JUST RIP IT OUT, AND THEN THEY'RE GONNA HAVE TO PAY TO PUT IT IN, PUT IT IN AGAIN." YEAH, IT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I MEAN, CERTAINLY THE, THE SIDEWALK, IF THEY... WHEN DEVELOPMENTS PUT IN A SIDEWALK, CERTAINLY THOSE GO IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, WHETHER THAT'S EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY OR RIGHT OF WAY THAT THEY'RE DEDICATING AS PART OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT. UM, IN THIS EXAMPLE, YOU CAN IMAGINE THAT IF THERE [00:25:01] WAS A SIGNIFICANT WIDENING OF COLTRANE, EVEN IF THE SIDEWALK WAS ON THE, YOU KNOW, THE, KIND OF THE FAR EASTERN EDGE OF THAT NEW DEDICATED RIGHT OF WAY, THAT THE DISTURBANCE THAT MIGHT BE REQUIRED ON COLTRANE AND THAT MIGHT DISRUPT THAT EXISTING SIDEWALK. I CAN'T... THAT'S NOT FOR CERTAIN, BUT I CAN DEFINITELY SEE THAT BEING A POSSIBILITY. WOULD THEY BE REQUIRED TO PUT THE SIDEWALK BACK IF IT WERE WIDENED AND REMOVED? THOSE WOULD COME, THOSE BECOME OURS THROUGH THE PLATTING PROCESS. SO THOSE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE DEDICATED TO THE CITY AS IN WORK YOUR WAY THROUGH THE, THE PLATTING PROCESS AND THOSE PLATS ARE, UH, THOSE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. BUT IT'S CURRENTLY, IT IS TWO LANES ON THAT SIDE FROM THE, EACH, EACH PART FROM THE PROPERTY LINE THE ENTIRE WAY DOWN, OR IS IT JUST THE ENTRANCE ON THIS? REMIND ME OF THAT. 'CAUSE IF WE'RE GONNA WIDEN IT INEVITABLY, AND THEN THE CITY'S GONNA PUT ONE IN REGARDLESS, WHY WOULD WE MAKE THEM PUT ONE IN? I THINK IF MR. MCKINNIS HAD HERE, HE'D TELL YOU HE'S ARGUING FOR THAT WIDENING AT ANY MOMENT FOR UNCOMMON GROUND. SO THE WIDENING ISSUE IS BASICALLY ONE OF THE CONFLICTS THAT EXISTED WITH THE UNCOMMON GROUND INITIALLY, AND THE ROADWAY EASEMENT THAT'S UP THERE IS DIFFICULT. RIGHT. UH, YOU'VE GOT THE THUNDERHEAD HILLS DEVELOPMENT, WHICH HAS BEEN THERE FROM THE CORNER OF COVELL. YOU'VE GOT THE FLOODPLAIN DOWN ON THE BOTTOM. IT RUNS UP THROUGH THE PRIVATE AREA. YOU'VE GOT SOME AREAS THERE THAT HAVE SEVEN TO EIGHT FOOT DROPS ALONG THE BACK OF THAT. THERE IS NO SIDEWALK THERE ALL THE WAY UP TO WHERE FAITH BIBLE IS. WE'VE APPROVED THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT THAT'S IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO IT TO THE, UH, NORTH. UH, THERE IS NO SIDEWALK ACROSS THE FRONT OF THAT, AS I RECALL, AND EVERYTHING ON UP TO THE CORNER IS BASICALLY EITHER UNDEVELOPED AT THIS POINT IN TIME OR HAS BEEN SOLD FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THERE MAY BE SOME SIDEWALKS UP THERE, BUT I, I THINK WE'RE STILL GONNA HAVE SOME PROBLEMS WITH ROADWAY WIDENING, ET CETERA. AND SO, I MEAN, IT, IT WOULD BE A SIDEWALK THAT STARTS AT THE END OF THEIR PROPERTY, ENDS AT THE END OF THEIR PROPERTY, THEN THEY'RE GONNA HAVE TO RUN ACROSS THE STREET. AND I BELIEVE IF YOU GO ACROSS THE STREET, THERE'S ONE AREA WHERE YOU'VE GOT - THERE'S 30 ACRES BY ITSELF RIGHT THERE. I CAN'T THINK OF WHAT THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT IS BEFORE UNCOMMON GROUND, BUT I BELIEVE THERE IS A SIDEWALK OVER ON THAT SIDE OF THE ROAD. THERE IS. YEAH. YEAH, THERE IS. THERE'S A, THERE'S A SIDEWALK ON THAT SIDE. YEAH. AND OTHER THAN THAT, THAT'S THE ONLY SIDEWALK THAT APPEARS ANYWHERE THAT I CAN RECALL ALONG THAT ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT. YOU'VE GOT THE CHURCH PROPERTY UP ON THE CORNER, A COUPLE OF PRIVATE RESIDENCES THAT WILL PROBABLY GO UP FOR SALE, BUT THE FAMILY DOESN'T WANNA SELL THEM AT THIS POINT IN TIME BASED UPON THE AGE OF THE OWNERS, LOOKING FOR STEPPED UP BASIS, ET CETERA. OKAY. ANY OTHER FURTHER COMMENTS, UH, FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NONE, LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. OOPS, SIR. ON THE EXCEPTION. OH, YES. I'M SORRY. SO THE FIRST THING TO BE VOTED ON IS, UH, IS ONLY THE, UM, VARIANCE. SO THE SAID CONSIDERATION TO INCLUDE THE APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE OF SUBDIVISION... OF TITLE 21 SUBDIVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, A VARIANCE TO SECTION 21.02.010, WHICH REQUIRES A... NOPE. OH, SORRY. OH, THERE IT IS. S - OKAY. SO THE FIRST ONE WE HAVE TO VOTE ON. WE DO HAVE TO VOTE ON THESE, UH, AGENDA ITEMS SEPARATELY. THE FIRST ONE IS THE, UM, CONSIDERATION TO INCLUDE THE APPROVAL OF THE EXCEPTION TO TITLE 22.6.1. E, WHICH REQUIRES SIDEWALKS ALONG PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THAT SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEM. MOTION TO APPROVE VARIANCE. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE. SECOND. WE HAVE A SECOND. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THE ACCEPT... THE VARIANCE IS APPROVED AND IS FINISHED HERE TONIGHT. NOW LET'S VOTE ON THE SITE PLAN. SO CASE NUMBER SP26-0009, PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR FAITH BIBLE CHURCH EXPANSION. LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO SECOND ON THE SITE PLAN. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. BY VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND THIS IS FINISHED HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. LOOKING, OR MOVING DOWN THE AGENDA TO [J. Case No. SP26-00010; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Site Plan for OU Health FSED, located just northeast of the Santa Fe and 33rd intersection. (Wallace Design; Ward 3)] 4J, CASE NUMBER SP26-00010, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN FOR OU HEALTH FSED LOCATED JUST NORTHEAST OF THE SANTA FE AND 33RD INTERSECTION. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? THANK YOU. UM, ALL RIGHT. WE'LL LET YOU GO AHEAD AND PRESENT. THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR OU HEALTH FSED MEDICAL FACILITY LOCATED IN THE BRISTOL PARK COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NORTHEAST... OF THE SANTA FE AND [00:30:01] 33RD INTERSECTION. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WILL BE 11,375 SQUARE FEET. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. THANK YOU. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO CITY STAFF'S PRESENTATION? THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR OF CITY STAFF FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NONE, LOOKING FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS, UH, AGENDA ITEM? COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. AND AS A REMINDER, PLEASE ADDRESS ALL QUESTIONS TO ME. AND THEN AFTER EVERYBODY SAYS THEIR QUESTIONS, WE'LL TRY TO GET YOUR ANSWERS. OKAY. THANK YOU. CHRIS WASSON. I AM A RESIDENT OF THE BRISTOL PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. AND SO WHEN I SAW THIS, UH, I HAD SOME CONCERNS AS TO IS IT A 24-HOUR FACILITY? UH, ARE THERE BACKUP GENERATORS THAT ARE GONNA BE USED ON SITE? WHAT KINDS OF EMERGENCY VEHICLES CAN WE EXPECT THROUGH THE AREA? UH, THE DEPRESSION OF, UM, PROPERTY VALUES AND EVEN A DEC - OR, OR A FLATTENING OR A DECREASE OF THE PROPERTY VALUES. UM, ANY, ANY OF THESE KINDS OF THINGS THAT WOULD DISRUPT LIVING IN THAT AREA BECAUSE I KNOW I'M NOT, PROBABLY NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT RE - I'M ONE OF THE ONLY ONES THAT PROBABLY REALIZED THAT THIS WAS A HEARING GOING ON PERTAINING TO SOMETHING LIKE THIS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. UM, NOT EVEN A MEMBER OF OUR HOA IS OVER, IS HERE. SO, UM, THAT WOULD BE EVERYTHING FOR ME. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS? COME ON UP. MAYOR, GOOD SEEING YOU. HEY, HOW ARE WE DOING TODAY? DAR- DARRYL DAVIS. UM, MY CONCERNS OR QUESTIONS I WOULD LIKE TO ANSWER, THE, I LIKE THE 24 - IT'S A TWENTY FOUR SEVEN FACILITY. UH, MY CONCERN IS THE LIGHT AND SOUND INTRUSION AT NIGHT BECAUSE THE WAY I'M READING THE PLANS, THE AMBULANCE ENTRANCE IS GONNA BE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND THEY'RE GONNA BE COMING IN PROBABLY FROM THE NORTH, THEN TURNING AROUND. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE PROTOCOL IS GONNA BE FOR THE AMBULANCES OR WHO, WHATEVER TYPE OF MEDICAL FACILITY IS GONNA BE THERE. BUT KNOWING SINCE I LIVE SOUTH OF THE BIG GROCERY STORE THERE, ANYTHING AT NIGHT IS VERY QUIET IN, IN OUR PART OF TOWN. UH, AND THERE'S GONNA BE SOUND REVERBING OFF OF THAT BUILDING IF THERE'S GONNA, IF THE, IF THE AMBULANCES ARE STILL GONNA BE IN THEIR CODE ON EITHER LIGHTS OR SOUND BECAUSE, UH, SOMETHING THAT YOU ALL DON'T HAVE TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT, BUT WE ARE, UH, IS THE SOUND INTRUSION THAT WE GET FROM OKLAHOMA CITY, FROM PURINA, 2:00 TO 3:00 IN THE MORNING WHEN THEY'RE DRYING DOG FOOD. UH, WE HEAR IT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND I'M IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF, UH, RIVER CREEK. SO THAT IS MY CONCERN THERE. UH, HOW'S THAT GOING TO BE MAINTAINED? WHAT, WHAT IS THE PROTOCOL FOR WHATEVER EMERGENCY VEHICLES COME IN AT NIGHT? BECAUSE I, I, I THINK I ALSO READ WHETHER THERE'S NOT GONNA BE ANY FENCING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. AND SO THE WAY THAT PROPERTY'S THERE IS YOU HAVE THAT PROPERTY, THEN THERE'S THE BIG VALLEY THERE. UH, THEN YOU HAVE FIVE OR SIX HOUSES IN BRISTOL PARK THAT ARE RIGHT THERE. BUT THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS NORTH OF THEM NEIGHBORS WILL ALSO BE AFFECTED BY THAT. GOTCHA. ANYTHING ELSE? THAT'S ALL TODAY. PERFECT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR AGAINST THIS? OKAY. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. WILL THE APPLICANT COME ON UP FOR US? DO YOU HAVE A LIST OF ITEMS YOU NEED TO HELP YOU? UM, I'LL TRY TO REMEMBER MOST OF THEM. UH, THIS IS MILLIE ANGIER WITH WALLACE DESIGN COLLECTIVE. UM, TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, THIS IS GONNA FUNCTION MORE AS THE URGENT CARE, A 24-HOUR URGENT CARE. THERE IS NO OVERNIGHT STAY AT THIS FACILITY. AND AS FAR AS THE AMBULANCE GO, THIS WILL BE A PICKUP LOCATION AND, UM, IF THERE IS AN EMERGENCY, THERE WILL BE LIGHTS FLASHING, BUT NO SOUNDS. OKAY. I HOPE THAT, UM, THAT SATISFIES A LOT OF YOUR CONCERNS. SO THE, SO IT IS 24 HOURS, BUT IT'S ONLY AN URGENT CARE AND IT'S ONLY A PICKUP FACILITY, NOT AN OVERNIGHT STAY. YES, THAT'S CORRECT. UM, SO THERE WILL BE NO AMBULANCES RUSHING TO THE S - ESSENTIALLY, AND IF THERE ARE, THERE'S ZERO SOUND. YES, THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. SO ONLY THE LIGHTS IF IT'S EMERGENCY TO PICK SOMEBODY UP, NOT TO DELIVER SOMEBODY. YES, THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. UM, TALK ABOUT, UM, I'M ASSUMING THE LIGHT AND SOUND INTRUSION WAS SPECIFICALLY TO THE AMBULANCES AND NOT THE LOCA - THE PHYSICAL LIGHTS ON THE FACILITY. YES. BUT OBVIOUSLY THOSE WILL COMPLY WITH - YEAH. ALL OF OUR RULES. MM-HMM. OKAY. [00:35:04] OH, BACKUP GENERATOR. IS THERE ANY GENERATORS? YES, THERE IS A BACKUP GENERATOR ON THE - TALK ABOUT THAT A LITTLE BIT, WHERE THEY'RE LOCATED, HOW'S THAT SURROUNDED OR WHAT DO YOU, WHAT ARE WE DOING THERE ON THOSE? UM, THE BACKUP GENERATOR WILL BE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. UM, YOU CAN SEE IT RIGHT THERE. GOTCHA. THIS LITTLE SMALL RECTANGLE ON THE NORTH SIDE, UM, RIGHT THERE. YEP. GOTCHA. UM, I BELIEVE IT IS GAS POWERED. UM - IS IT ENCOMPASSED IN A, IN A SURROUND OF ANY SORT OR IS IT JUST OPEN? IS THERE A, IS THERE A SCREENING AROUND IT? UM, THERE IS A SCREENING AROUND IT. OKAY. UM, AS FAR AS, UH, ENERGY AND LOADS. I'M A SIMPLE ENGINEER, SO I DON'T KNOW HOW TO ANSWER THAT. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE I MISSED, COMMISSIONERS? ANYTHING ELSE? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE APPLICANT? OKAY. IF NOT, LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THIS AGENDA ITEM. MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND IS FINISHED HERE TONIGHT. MOVING ON TO AGENDA [K. Case No. SP26-00011; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Site Plan for The Quarters at Kelly, located on Kelley Pointe Parkway, west of Kelly Ave. (CEC Inc; Ward 3)] ITEM 4K, CASE NUMBER SP26-00011, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN FOR THE QUARTERS AT KELLY, LOCATED AT KELLY POINT PARKWAY WEST OF KELLY AVENUE. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. UH, MR. BRYANT. OH, THERE YOU GO. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN FOR THE QUARTERS AT KELLY LOCATED ON KELLY POINT PARKWAY, WEST OF KELLY AVENUE. FOR THIS PARTICULAR OFFICE PARK, INDIVIDUAL SITE PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR EACH STRUCTURE AS THEY DEVELOP. COMMON AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE PLAT ENCOMPASS SHARED AMENITIES SUCH AS PARKING AND SOLID WASTE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. THANK YOU. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO, UH, ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF CITY STAFF? OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE CITY STAFF OR THE APPLICANT FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT IN THE, IN THE PUBLIC? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THIS AGENDA, ITEM 4K. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. BY VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND IS FINISHED HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. AGENDA ITEM [L. Case No. SP25-00017; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval for a Site Plan for OnCue #156, located on the southeast corner of Kelly and Covell. (Johnson & Associates; Ward 1) Said Consideration to Include Consideration of Approval of the Following: Variance to Title 21, Subdivisions, of the Edmond Municipal Code: A Variance to Section 21.02.010 which requires 325 Feet of Separation between Driveways] 4L, CASE NUMBER SP25-00017, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN FOR ON QUEUE NUMBER 156 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF KELLY AND COVELL. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, ONTO YOU. THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR ON QUEUE NUMBER F - 156 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE KELLY AND COVELL INTERSECTION. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE KELLY CORNER HONEYVILLE FIELD DEVELOPMENT AND IS THE FIRST COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO DEVELOP. A VARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED FROM TITLE 2102010 FOR DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCE AS THE SITE DESIGN DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM 325 FOOT SEPARATION REQUIREMENT BETWEEN UNSIGNALIZED DRIVEWAYS. STAFF SUPPORTS THIS VARIANCE REQUEST. THE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT SUBJECT, SUBJECT TO THE VARIANCE. THANK YOU. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO THE PRESENTATION OF CITY STAFF? OKAY. HEARING NONE, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS OF CITY STAFF OR THE APPLICANT FOR THE COMMISSIONERS? HAVE THE OTHER ON CUES IN EDMOND HAD THIS VARIANCE OR IS THERE ANY KIND OF, UH, SIMILAR ONES THAT WE CAN LOOK AT? THAT ONE ON 33RD HAS A PRETTY FAR SET OFFSET ENTRANCE ON THE, OFF OF 33RD, BUT I DON'T KNOW, BUT COULD SPEAK TO THAT. SO I THINK THE, THE ONE OFF OF EDMOND ROAD, I THINK THAT MIGHT BE PENN, IT SEEMS LIKE THAT ENTRANCE IS REALLY CLOSE, UH, AND THAT ONE SEEMS TO WORK FINE, BUT I WAS WONDERING IF THERE'S ANY OTHERS THAT YOU CAN POINT TO THAT ARE THAT, THAT HAVE THIS VARIANCE? HANG ON ONE SECOND. YEAH, WE'LL GET TO YOU. THIS IS, OH, THE APPLICANT, I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. YEP. UH, NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF. WE DIDN'T WORK ON THE OTHER ONES. UH, THIS ONE DOES HAVE A, KIND OF A SPECIAL CASE WITH THE, THE MEDIAN, SO THEY, THEY WERE REQUESTING ADDITIONAL, UH, DRIVE BECAUSE OF THE MEDIANS THAT BLOCK FROM TURNING LEFT, SO FOR THAT REASON. [00:40:09] OKAY. ANY OTHER FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS AT THIS TIME? AND SO YOU'VE RE - I MEAN, YOU'VE GOT FOUR ENTRANCES. ONE OF THE MEDIANS FOR E - AND THEN ONE STILL CLOSER TO THE CORNERS. YES. UH - TALK TO ME ABOUT THAT A LITTLE BIT, BECAUSE THAT'S A STRUGGLE WITH - RIGHT. THAT CORNER'S BUSY AS CAN BE. AND SO - YEAH, THERE'S ACTUALLY FIVE TOTAL, BUT TWO OF THEM - RIGHT. ARE, UH, SHARED ENTRANCES WITH THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT. YEP. UM, SO, AND, AND ONE OF THEM IS MOSTLY FOR TRUCK ENTRANCES IN THE BACK, SO THE ONES THAT'LL BE USED, THE LION'S SHARE WILL BE USED WERE, ARE THOSE TWO THAT ARE CLOSEST TO THE INTERSECTION. YEAH. SO THAT'S THE, MOST OF THE CARS THAT ARE GOING THERE TO FUEL UP. AND THE ONE - I'LL TELL YOU THE ONE I'M REALLY MOST CONCERNED ABOUT IS THAT ONE THAT'S GONNA BE ON KELLY, THAT'S THE CLOSEST TO THE INTERSECTION, BECAUSE YOU'RE GONNA HAVE PEOPLE TRYING TO TURN LEFT AND GO WHAT E - GO WEST ONTO COVELL AND CUT ACROSS FOUR LANES OF TRAFFIC. YEAH, AND - THAT'S THE ONE I'LL BE HONEST WITH, THAT ONE BUGS ME A LOT. WELL, THAT ONE HAS A MEDIAN THERE, SO THEY CAN'T TURN LEFT. THERE'S THE TURN LANE. NO, YOU'RE GONNA PULL OUT RIGHT THERE. YOU'RE SAYING YOU CAN'T PULL OUT OF THAT ENTRANCE? THE ONE ON KELLY? YOU PULL OUT AND TURN LANE. RIGHT, YOU'RE GONNA PULL OUT AND YOU'RE GONNA KINDA CUT ACROSS TRAFFIC TO GET THE TURN LANE AT THAT INTERSECTION. I, I BELIEVE THERE'S - THAT'S THE ONE. THERE'S A MEDIAN IN THE, IN THE STREET THAT DOESN'T LET YOU TURN LEFT. NO, NO, YOU'RE COMING OUT RIGHT AND GOING RIGHT TO THAT INTERSECTION. OH, YOU'RE SAYING-THAT'S CORRECT. TURN RIGHT AND THEN TURN OUT THE - 'CAUSE HOW CLOSE IT IS THAT INTERSECTION. RIGHT, GOTCHA. UH, YEAH. AND IT WILL HAPPEN BECAUSE MITCH PARK IS RIGHT THERE. MM-HMM. RIGHT. AND YOU CAN'T GO, YOU CAN'T TURN TO GET WEST ANY OTHER WAY, BUT THAT, THOSE TWO ENTRANCES. RIGHT. AND THE ONLY OTHER WAY - AND SO MY, I MEAN, MY REAL COMMENT RIGHT NOW IS TO TAKE AWAY THAT FIRST ENTRANCE. MM-HMM. YEAH, AND THE ISSUE WITH THAT IS ON CUE KINDA HAS A CERTAIN LAYOUT FOR EX- EXPECTATION, I GUESS, FOR ALL THEIR ON CUES. YEP. THAT ONE FEEDS RIGHT INTO THE PUMPS ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE PUMPS. SO THAT ONE AND THE OTHER DRIVE ARE KINDA THEIR MAIN ONES THAT THEY NEED FOR ACCESS TO THE PUMPS, I GUESS. OKAY. THE ONE ON MAY AND 178TH, IT HAS THE EXACT SAME LAYOUT AND IT, WHAT MOST PEOPLE TEND TO DO IS THEY GO UP TO THE ENTRANCE THAT'S THE FURTHEST ON THE BOTTOM THERE - YEP. TO TRY TO MAKE THAT BECAUSE THEY CAN'T, BECAUSE THE CARS ARE QUEUING. THAT'S WHAT THE, THAT ONE DOES. THAT'S MY ONLY CON - I MEAN, I, I'M A HUGE FAN OF THIS COMING TO CITY. THIS, THIS NEEDS TO BE THERE. I LIVE IN THE AREA. I WANT IT TO HAPPEN. THAT'S MY ONE CONCERN. HOW'S THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT? I'D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR COMMENTS ON THAT AND HOW YOU GUYS GOT COMFORTABLE WITH THAT, UM, BEING SO CLOSE TO THE INTERSECTION RIGHT THERE WITH THE TRAFFIC ISSUES. I CANNOT SPEAK TO THAT AT THIS TIME. OKAY. UM, OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER WAS THE ONE THAT WORKED WITH HIM MOSTLY ON IT. UM, I CAN GET WITH HIM AND GET YOU MORE INFORMATION AS TO WHY HE FEELS UNCOMFORTABLE. SO OBVIOUSLY THEY'VE KIND OF BLESSED IT THOUGH. YES. I MEAN, CORRECT. OKAY. IF I MAY, ED, THAT'S KIND OF - PLEASE DO. SORRY, GO AHEAD. NO, GO FOR IT. YEAH, YEAH. UH, THAT'S KIND OF ALSO WHY WE HAD THOSE THREE ENTRANCES, UH, TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE MAYBE IF THEY WANNA MAKE THAT, THAT MANEUVER OVER TO MAKE A LEFT TURN ONTO, UH, COVELL, THAT THEY GO DOWN TO ONE OF THE OTHER ENTRANCES. THAT GIVES THEM TIME AND DISTANCE TO MOVE OVER. I HOPE THAT HAPPENS. SO DO WE - YEAH, AND SOME OF THAT IS, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE LEARN, UM, OH, THERE'S MORE DRIVEWAYS I CAN ACCESS OUT OF THIS THING AND, AND MAKE IT A LOT EASIER ON MYSELF. SO - YEAH. UH, WITH ANYTHING. DO, DO WE KNOW WHAT'S GONNA BE IN THE LOT, UH, AT THE FURTHEST SOUTH ENTRANCE? 'CAUSE THE ONE ON 170TH AND 178TH AND MAY, IT'S BRAHMS, SO YOU GO THROUGH THEIR PARKING LOT TO GET TO THAT, UH, THIRD EXIT. UH, I DON'T THINK IT'S A PART - THAT'S, THAT'S THE EXISTING HOME RIGHT NOW, CORRECT? THERE IS AN EXISTING HOME RIGHT THERE NOW. AND OUR DRIVE IS JUST ADJACENT TO THEIR DRIVE, BUT I BELIEVE THAT, UH, PROPERTY HAS ALREADY BEEN BOUGHT, SO I'M NOT SURE IT'S OCCUPIED RIGHT NOW, THE HOME. BUT, UH, THEY DO HAVE SOME PLANS, BUT I DON'T THINK THEY'RE NAILED DOWN YET. IT'S STILL IN THE AIR. OKAY. SO THEY, THEY LOOKED AT SEVERAL DIFFERENT THINGS IN THAT AREA, APARTMENTS AND - SURE. SO I DON'T THINK ANYTHING'S NAILED DOWN AT THIS POINT. SURE. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OR CITY STAFF? ANY COMMENTS, MR. BRYANT, ON THAT OR YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO, UH, PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR US? THANK YOU. I LOOK FORWARD TO THIS DEVELOPMENT. TAYLOR WILSON. SO I SHARE YOUR SAME CONCERNS AND I WOULD ENCOURAGE THIS COMMITTEE TO REQUEST, BECAUSE THIS IS PROBABLY THE THIRD, FOURTH, FIFTH TIME THAT I'VE HEARD THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER REPORT NEEDED FOR DISCUSSION AT THIS COMMITTEE, THAT MAYBE WE HAVE A MORE FULL, ROBUST DISCUSSION IN THE MEMO IF THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO COME TO THIS COMMITTEE AND PROVIDE INSIGHT THAT THIS COMMITTEE NEEDS TO MAKE ITS DECISIONS. THANK YOU. ANY FURTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR OR AGAINST AGENDA ITEM 4L? OKAY. AND THE ONLY COMMENT TO THAT, I KNOW WE'VE HAD A CHANGE IN STAFF WITH AUSTIN NO LONGER BEING [00:45:01] HERE, SO THAT'S THE ONLY THING I CAN REPORT BACK A LITTLE BIT, SO. ALL RIGHT. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO SECOND ON THE, UH, LET'S DO THE SITE PLAN FIRST. OKAY. YOU WANT THE VARIANCE FIRST? THE VARIANCE NEEDS TO GO FIRST. SO THIS IS THE CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL FOR THE VARIANCE TO TITLE 21 SUBDIVISIONS OF THE EDMOND MUNICIPAL CODE, A VARIANCE TO SECTION 21.02.010, WHICH REQUIRES 325 FEET OF SEPARATION BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THAT ONE. MOTION TO APPROVE VARIANCE. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND. AND A SECOND. BY A VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THE VARIANCE IS APPROVED. MOVING ON TO THE SITE PLAN FOR ON Q NUMBER 156, LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. UH, THAT IS APPROVED AND BOTH ITEMS WILL MOVE TO CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. THANK YOU. MOVING ON THE AGENDA [M.     Case No. Z26-00021; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a Zoning Map Amendment from “F-1” Light Industrial to “CBD” Central Business District for the property located north of W Hurd Street and west of the BNSF Railroad Line. (Canvas Development; Ward 1)] TO 4M, CASE NUMBER Z26-00021, PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FROM F1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO CBD CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF WEST HEARD AND WEST OF THE BNS- BNSF RAILROAD LINE. UH, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THANK YOU. MR. BRYAN, WILL YOU PRESENT? YES, THANK YOU. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THIS ZONING MAP AMENDMENT IS APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES. AS YOU INDICATED, THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION NORTH OF HEARD AND WEST OF THE RAIL CORRIDOR. NEARBY ZONING AND USES INCLUDE TO THE NORTH AND WEST ARE ZONED F1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND ARE OCCUPIED BY A REGIONAL DRAINAGE FACILITY. TO THE SOUTH ACROSS HEARD IS ZONED CBD CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AND IS DEVELOPED AS A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. TO THE EAST IS ZONED FOR AND DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. THE APPLICATION IS FOR A BY-RIGHT ZONING DISTRICT, WHICH ALLOWS A VARIETY OF RESIDENTIAL, CIVIC, COMMERCIAL, AND LOW INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL USES. THE EDMOND PLAN CATEGORIZES THIS AREA AS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE REQUESTED DISTRICT IS APPROPRIATE. AT THEIR REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING ON OCTOBER 13, 2026, THE CENTRAL EDMOND URBAN DISTRICT BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BY VOTE OF FIVE TO ZERO. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADD TO MR. BRYAN'S PRESENTATION? NOTHING TO ADD, BUT HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. UH, SO THIS IS IN THE CBD, IT'S IN OUR CENTRAL EDMOND URBAN DISTRICT? OR THIS IS THE AGREEMENT? YES. OKAY. IT DID GO TO THE URBAN BOARD. OKAY. AND THEN BECAUSE IT'S ZONING, WHICH THEY DON'T SEE A LOT OF. RIGHT. UM, YEAH, SO WENT TO THEM. GOTCHA. AND IT'LL COME TO YOU AND THEN COUNCIL FOR FINAL DECISION. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR THE CITY STAFF BY THE COMMISSIONERS? HAVE YOU HAD ANY, UH, DISCUSSIONS WITH REDEMPTION CHURCH ACROSS THE STREET OR MET WITH THEM? THANK YOU. UH, YES, WE HAVE. UM, JUST FRIENDLY AS A NEIGHBOR. UM, SO WHEN WE FIRST, UM, PUT THIS PROPERTY UNDER CONTRACT, I WENT TO GET COFFEE WITH HIM AND GOT UP. VERY NICE GUY, THE PASTOR. UM, SO YEAH, WE'VE TALKED TO THEM, YES. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR CITY STAFF FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? SEEING NONE, UH, PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE CLOSED. LOOKING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND. MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. BY VOTE OF THREE TO ZERO, THAT IS APPROVED AND MOVES ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NOW WE MOVE ON TO THE AGENDA, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE, CITIZEN COMMENTS. ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK ON PLANNING COMMISSION RELATED ITEMS THAT'S NOT ON THE AGENDA? SEEING NONE, CITIZEN'S COMMENTS IS CLOSED. MOVING ON TO COMMENTS FROM THE CHAIR OR OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I HAVE NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. DOES ANY OTHER MEMBER HAVE A, ANY COMMENTS FOR THE GOOD OF THE, OF EVERYBODY? SEEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE OFFICIALLY CLOSED. I'M LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND. AND A SECOND. AND WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.